Debug Skill

Diagnose and fix issues systematically. Enhanced with MCP integrations for deeper analysis and automatic regression test generation.

When to Use

• Auto-invoked by qa-commit skill on RED verdict
• Error messages appearing in console/terminal
• Feature not working as expected
• Build/runtime failures
• "Something is broken" situations

Modes

Mode	Trigger	Context Provided
Auto	qa-commit RED verdict	Failed G#N/AC#N, error messages
Manual	User invokes	User describes issue

The Enhanced Flow

Phase 0: Context Loading (if auto-invoked)
    ↓
Phase 0.5: Jidoka Escalation Check ──→ [Tier 2/3] ──→ ESCALATE to human
    ↓ [Tier 1]
Phase 1: Gather (ReadLints, Browser MCP, Context7)
    ↓
Phase 2: Reproduce (Browser MCP)
    ↓
Phase 3: Isolate (Known Issues DB query)
    ↓
Phase 4: Diagnose
    ↓
Phase 5: Fix
    ↓
Phase 6: Verify ──→ [FAIL] ──→ Phase 8 ──→ Phase 0.5
    ↓ [PASS]
Phase 7: Harden (generate regression test)
    ↓
Phase 8: Update Jidoka Counters (reset on success)

---

Phase 0: Context Loading (Auto-Invoke Only)

When invoked from qa-commit, receive context:

## Debug Context (from qa-commit)

**Failed Criteria:**
- [G#N or AC#N]: [Description]

**Verification Report:**
- ReadLints errors: [list]
- Shell errors: [list]
- Browser errors: [list if applicable]

**Expected Behavior:**
[From QA Contract]

**Actual Behavior:**
[Observed during verification]

Skip this phase if manually invoked.

---

Phase 0.5: Jidoka Escalation Check (NEW)

Before attempting fix, check escalation tier to determine if human intervention is needed.

Track Error History

Maintain error_history across debug invocations:

Field	Description
error_signature	Hash of error type + location
count	Times this exact error seen
fixes_attempted	List of fix descriptions

Tier Evaluation

Tier	Condition	Action
Tier 1	error_count < 3	Continue to Phase 1 (normal debug)
Tier 2	error_count >= 3 (same error)	ESCALATE to human
Tier 3	total_errors >= 5 (any)	ESCALATE to human

Tier 2/3 Escalation Output

If escalation triggered, skip Phases 1-7 and output:

R | [Feature] | AGENT | JIDOKA STOP
---
Same error detected [N] times:
> [Error message]

Attempted fixes:
1. [Fix 1] - Failed: [why]
2. [Fix 2] - Failed: [why]
3. [Fix 3] - Failed: [why]

Options:
A. Try different approach - [describe alternative]
B. Skip this commit, continue to next
C. Pause session, investigate manually
D. Abort feature, reassess scope

---
Reply with A, B, C, or D

Invoke decision-capture skill with escalation context.

Escalation Resolution

On user response:

• A: Reset error_count for this signature, apply new approach
• B: Mark commit as SKIPPED, proceed to next
• C: End session, invoke session-status for final metrics
• D: End session with ABANDONED outcome

---

Phase 1: Gather Information (Enhanced)

1.1 ReadLints Integration

Use Cursor's ReadLints tool on affected files:

ReadLints:
  paths: [affected files from context]

Categorize:

• Errors → Primary suspects
• Warnings → Secondary investigation
• Related files → Expand scope if needed

1.2 Browser MCP Deep Scan

For frontend issues, use Browser MCP:

browser_navigate: [affected URL]
browser_snapshot: Get current DOM state
browser_console_messages: All errors/warnings
browser_network_requests: API failures

Extract:

• Console errors with stack traces
• Failed network requests with status codes
• DOM state anomalies

1.3 Context7 Error Lookup

Identify libraries involved and query for error patterns:

Context7 MCP:
1. resolve-library-id: libraryName = "[library from stack trace]"
2. get-library-docs: topic = "[error message keywords]", mode = "info"

Look for:

• Known issues with the library
• Common error patterns
• Recommended fixes

1.4 Standard Gathering

• Get full error message/stack trace
• Check server logs if backend issue
• Identify when issue started (recent changes?)

---

Phase 2: Reproduce (Enhanced)

2.1 Document Steps

## Reproduction Steps

1. Navigate to: [URL]
2. Action: [What triggers the issue]
3. Expected: [What should happen]
4. Actual: [What actually happens]

2.2 Browser MCP Reproduction

browser_navigate: [starting URL]
browser_click: [trigger element]
browser_type: [if input needed]
browser_take_screenshot: Capture failure state
browser_network_requests: Capture API calls

2.3 Capture Evidence

• Screenshot at failure point
• Console log at failure
• Network request/response

---

Phase 3: Isolate (Enhanced with Known Issues DB)

3.1 Query Known Issues Database

Before deep investigation, check if this is a known issue:

Notion MCP:
API-query-database:
  database_id: "[KNOWN_ISSUES_DB_ID]"
  filter:
    property: "Error Pattern"
    rich_text:
      contains: "[error keywords]"

If match found:

## Known Issue Match

**Pattern:** [Error pattern from DB]
**Root Cause:** [From DB]
**Fix Pattern:** [From DB]
**Occurrences:** [N] times

Applying known fix...

→ Skip to Phase 5 with known fix.

If no match: → Continue to Phase 4.

3.2 Standard Isolation

• Trace error to specific file/line
• Check recent git changes: git log -5 --oneline
• Search for related code: SemanticSearch, Grep

---

Phase 4: Diagnose

4.1 Root Cause Analysis

Read relevant code with context:

Read: [file with error]
SemanticSearch: "How is [function] supposed to work?"

4.2 Check Common Issues

• Type mismatches
• Null/undefined access
• Async timing issues
• Missing dependencies
• State management bugs
• API contract mismatches

4.3 Hypothesis Formation

## Diagnosis

**Root Cause:** [What's causing the issue]

**Evidence:**
- [Evidence 1]
- [Evidence 2]

**Proposed Fix:** [What needs to change]

---

Phase 5: Fix (Enhanced)

5.1 Pattern Compliance

Before implementing fix:

1. Invoke design-context skill (silent)
2. Check Context7 for library best practices
3. Ensure fix follows existing patterns

5.2 Implement Fix

• Propose minimal fix
• Explain why fix works
• Wait for user approval before implementing

5.3 Apply Fix

Make the code changes.

---

Phase 6: Verify (Enhanced)

6.1 Technical Verification

npm run typecheck
npm run lint
npm run test -- --grep "[related tests]"

6.2 Re-run qa-commit

For the specific failed criteria:

## Re-verification

Re-running qa-commit for:
- [G#N or AC#N that failed]

Result: [PASS/FAIL]

6.3 Outcome

If PASS: Continue to Phase 7 (Harden) If FAIL: Return to Phase 3 (Isolate) with new information

---

Phase 7: Harden (NEW)

Prevent regression by generating tests and updating knowledge base.

7.1 Generate Regression Test

Create test that would catch this issue:

For Backend (G#N):

// Regression test: [issue description]
// Debug session: [date]
it('should not [bug behavior] when [condition]', async () => {
  // Reproduction steps
  const result = await [action that caused bug];
  expect(result).not.toBe([buggy behavior]);
  expect(result).toBe([correct behavior]);
});

For Frontend (AC#N):

// Regression test: [issue description]
test('should handle [edge case]', async ({ page }) => {
  // Reproduction steps
  await page.goto('[URL]');
  await page.click('[trigger]');
  await expect(page.locator('[element]')).toBeVisible();
});

7.2 Invoke test-hardening

Invoking test-hardening skill for regression test...

7.3 Update Known Issues (if novel)

If this was a new issue pattern:

Notion MCP:
API-create-page:
  parent: { database_id: "[KNOWN_ISSUES_DB_ID]" }
  properties:
    Error Pattern: "[Error message pattern]"
    Root Cause: "[What caused it]"
    Fix Pattern: "[How to fix]"
    Library: [relation if applicable]
    Occurrences: 1

7.4 Capture Patine (if significant)

If this reveals a pattern worth remembering:

Invoking decision-capture skill...
"Learned: [pattern] causes [issue]. Fix: [approach]."

---

Phase 8: Update Jidoka Counters (NEW)

Update escalation counters based on fix outcome.

On GREEN (fix successful)

• Reset error_count for this signature to 0
• Clear fixes_attempted list
• Log success in session metrics
• Invoke session-status to update muda tracking

## Jidoka Counter Reset

Error signature: [hash]
Previous count: [N]
New count: 0
Status: RESOLVED

On RED (fix failed)

• Increment error_count for this signature
• Append fix description to fixes_attempted
• Return to Phase 0.5 for tier check

## Jidoka Counter Update

Error signature: [hash]
Count: [N] → [N+1]
Fix attempted: [description]
Next: Re-evaluate escalation tier

---

Output Format

## Debug Report

### Issue
[Brief description]

### Root Cause
[What caused it]

### Fix Applied
[What was changed]

### Verification
- TypeCheck: PASS
- Lint: PASS
- Tests: PASS
- qa-commit: GREEN

### Hardening
- Regression test: [Created/Skipped]
- Known Issues: [Added/Existing]
- Patine: [Captured/Skipped]

**Status:** RESOLVED

---

MCP Tools Used

Tool	Phase	Purpose
ReadLints	1	Get lint/type errors
Browser MCP	1, 2	Console, network, DOM
Context7	1	Library error patterns
Notion MCP	3, 7	Known Issues database
Shell	6	Run tests, typecheck
SemanticSearch	3, 4	Find related code
Grep	3	Search for patterns

---

Invocation

• Auto: Invoked by qa-commit on RED verdict
• Manual: "use debug skill"