Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

gtm-alignment

Align phases with GTM strategy, persona tiers, and KPI targets

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Works withNotion
See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md6.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

GTM Alignment Skill

Ensure implementation phasing aligns with go-to-market strategy by validating against persona tiers and estimating business value from KPI database.

CRITICAL: This skill MUST fetch real data from Notion. Do NOT make up personas or GTM tiers.

When to Use

  • During Ask mode Phase 2 (CONVERGE), after dependency-mapping
  • When prioritizing between equally-risky slices
  • Before finalizing phase order

Notion Database IDs

DatabaseIDPurpose
Persona DB2b1c4d5e-7bea-80ee-85c2-fb96dfdcf98bPersona tiers, RICE scores, characteristics
GTM Strategy2b2c4d5e-7bea-809d-8c49-cc6b443738dfPositioning, messaging, segments

Note: If API-query-data-source fails, use API-post-search with query "Persona" as fallback.

Instructions

Phase 1: Fetch Persona Tiers (REQUIRED)

Primary method - Query database:

CallMcpTool:
  server: user-notion
  toolName: API-query-data-source
  arguments: {"data_source_id": "2b1c4d5e-7bea-80ee-85c2-fb96dfdcf98b"}

Fallback method - Search (if query fails):

CallMcpTool:
  server: user-notion
  toolName: API-post-search
  arguments: {"query": "Persona"}

STOP if BOTH methods fail. Report error and do not proceed with made-up data.

Extract from Persona DB:

  • Persona name (title)
  • RICE score (for prioritization)
  • Goals, Pain points, Background
  • Market segments

Build Tier Priority Table (sorted by RICE score):

TierPersonaRICE ScoreKey Traits
T1[Highest RICE from Notion][Score][Goals/Pain points]
T2[Second RICE from Notion][Score][Goals/Pain points]
T3[Third RICE from Notion][Score][Goals/Pain points]

Evidence required: Show persona names and RICE scores from Notion

Phase 2: Fetch GTM Strategy (REQUIRED)

Primary method - Query database:

CallMcpTool:
  server: user-notion
  toolName: API-query-data-source
  arguments: {"data_source_id": "2b2c4d5e-7bea-809d-8c49-cc6b443738df"}

Fallback method - Search (if query fails):

CallMcpTool:
  server: user-notion
  toolName: API-post-search
  arguments: {"query": "GTM Strategy"}

STOP if BOTH methods fail. Report error and do not proceed with made-up data.

Extract from GTM Strategy:

  • Current positioning statement
  • Key differentiators vs. competitors
  • Priority segments/verticals
  • Messaging themes

Evidence required: Show positioning statement excerpt from Notion

Phase 3: Map Slices to Personas

Using the ACTUAL persona data from Phase 1, map each slice to the persona it serves:

SliceServes PersonaTierWhy
[Slice name][Persona from Notion]T1/T2/T3[Rationale]

Phase 4: Calculate GTM Score

GTM Score = (TierPriority x 3) + AnnouncementPotential

Where:
- TierPriority: T1=3, T2=2, T3=1, None=0
- AnnouncementPotential: Yes=2, Partial=1, No=0

Phase 4: Calculate GTM Score

GTM Score = (TierPriority x 3) + ValueScore + AnnouncementPotential

Where:
- TierPriority: T1=3, T2=2, T3=1, None=0
- ValueScore: Critical=3, High=2, Medium=1, Low=0
- AnnouncementPotential: Yes=2, Partial=1, No=0

Phase 5: Map Phases to Personas

PhaseServes TierPersonaFeatures IncludedCan Announce?
1T1[Primary][Slice list]Yes/No
2T1, T2[Primary, Secondary][Slice list]Yes/No
3AllAll personas[Slice list]Yes (Full Launch)

Rule: Each phase should fully serve at least one persona tier.

Phase 6: Reconcile with Risk Order

If GTM Score conflicts with Risk Score (from dependency-mapping):

ScenarioResolution
High GTM + High RiskSplit slice into MVP + Full (reduce risk, keep GTM priority)
High GTM + Low RiskPrioritize (move earlier in sequence)
Low GTM + Low RiskKeep in risk-based position
Low GTM + High RiskDefer (move later in sequence)

Document conflicts for checkpoint:

CONFLICT DETECTED:
- Risk order: #1.1 -> #1.2 -> #2.1 -> #2.2
- GTM order: #2.2 -> #1.1 -> #1.2 -> #2.1 (Invite flow is T1 priority)

RESOLUTION OPTIONS:
- Option A: Accept risk, prioritize GTM (ship #2.2 first)
- Option B: Split #2.2 into MVP + Full (ship #2.2-MVP in Phase 1)
- Option C: Ship #1.1 first, fast-follow with #2.2 (compromise)

Output Format

Include evidence of Notion fetch in output:

## GTM Alignment

### Data Sources (REQUIRED)

| Source | Status | Evidence |
|--------|--------|----------|
| Personas DB | ✓ Fetched | [N] records from `2b2c4d5e...` |
| GTM Strategy DB | ✓ Fetched | Positioning: "[first 50 chars...]" |

### Persona Tiers (from Notion)

| Tier | Persona | Characteristics |
|------|---------|-----------------|
| T1 | [From Notion] | [From Notion] |
| T2 | [From Notion] | [From Notion] |

### Strategy Fit
- Positioning: [From Notion GTM Strategy]
- Messaging: [Key message this enables]
- Differentiator: [Competitive advantage]

### Persona Coverage

| Phase | Serves Tier | Persona | Can Announce? |
|-------|-------------|---------|---------------|
| 1 | T1 | [Persona from Notion] | Yes/No |
| 2 | T1, T2 | [Personas from Notion] | Yes/No |

### Conflicts & Resolutions

| Conflict | Risk Order | GTM Order | Resolution |
|----------|------------|-----------|------------|
| [Description] | [Sequence] | [Sequence] | [Chosen option] |

Validation Checkpoint

Before proceeding, verify:

  • Personas DB queried successfully (not made up)
  • GTM Strategy DB queried successfully (not made up)
  • Each slice mapped to a real persona from Notion
  • Evidence shown in output (record counts, positioning excerpt)

If any query fails: STOP and report the error. Do NOT proceed with invented data.

Invocation

Invoke manually with "use gtm-alignment skill" or follow Ask mode Phase 2 (CONVERGE) which references this skill.

Related Skills

  • dependency-mapping - Run before GTM alignment
  • problem-framing - Provides persona context
  • phasing - Uses GTM scores for final ordering

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Produce an accounts-receivable aging report and surface overdue invoices for a Well workspace. Use when the user asks who owes them money, an AR aging report, overdue invoices, days sales outstanding (DSO), or which customers to chase.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WellApp-ai/Well345Updated Oct 15, 2026

Iterate until success or limit, composing existing skills with Jidoka integration

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WellApp-ai/Well345Updated Oct 15, 2026

Build a balance sheet (bilan) from a Well workspace. Use when the user asks for a balance sheet, bilan, assets/liabilities/equity, or financial position at a point in time.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WellApp-ai/Well345Updated Oct 15, 2026

Generate and maintain BPMN 2.0 diagrams linked to Gherkin scenarios

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WellApp-ai/Well345Updated Oct 15, 2026

Forecast cash flow and runway for a Well workspace from booked invoices and collected bank transactions. Use when the user asks for a cash-flow forecast, runway, how long until they run out of cash, projected balance, or expected inflows/outflows.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WellApp-ai/Well345Updated Oct 15, 2026

Review code changes against hard rules and conventions

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WellApp-ai/Well345Updated Oct 15, 2026

See all skills by WellApp-ai

Report a problem with this skill