Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

citation-diversifier

PRODUCES a citation-budget plan/report (`output/CITATION_BUDGET_REPORT.md`); does NOT edit the draft. Allocates an in-scope per-H3 budget (NO NEW FACTS) so drafts stop failing the global unique-citation gate; citation-injector applies it.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB
  • scripts/run.py13.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Citation Diversifier (budget-as-constraints) [NO NEW FACTS]

Triggers & routing

  • Trigger: cite boost, citation budget, unique citations too low, add more citations, improve reference density, 引用太少, 增加引用, 引用密度.

Purpose: fix a common survey failure mode:

  • the draft reads under-cited (or reuses the same few citations everywhere)
  • the pipeline fails the global unique-citation gate

This skill does not change prose by itself. It produces a constraint sheet: output/CITATION_BUDGET_REPORT.md.

Inputs

  • output/DRAFT.md
  • outline/outline.yml (H3 ids/titles; used to allocate budgets per subsection)
  • outline/writer_context_packs.jsonl (source of allowed_bibkeys_{selected,mapped,chapter,global} per H3)
  • citations/ref.bib

Output

  • output/CITATION_BUDGET_REPORT.md

Non-negotiables (NO NEW FACTS)

  • Only propose citation keys that exist in citations/ref.bib.
  • Only propose keys that are in-scope for the target H3 (prefer subsection-first scope; use chapter/global only when truly cross-cutting).
  • Do not propose “padding citations” that would require adding new claims or new numbers.

What a good budget report looks like (contract)

The report should feel like a constraint sheet, not a random list:

  • It states the blocking policy target and the gap-to-target (how many unique keys are missing; policy default is recommended).
  • For each H3, it proposes a scope-safe budget sized to actually close the gap:
    • small gaps: 3-6 keys / H3 is often enough
    • course_paper: cap suggestions at 3-6 keys / H3 and target the profile's 24/32 global budget
    • A150++ gaps: plan for ~6-12 keys / H3 (and avoid duplicates across H3 budgets)
  • It gives placement guidance (where in the subsection those keys can be embedded without adding new facts).

Canonical (parseable) lines required (downstream validators depend on these):

  • The target is derived from queries.md:citation_target (recommended by default for A150++).
  • - Global target (policy; blocking): >= <N> ...
  • - Gap: <K> (gap-to-target; if 0, injection can be a no-op PASS)

Optional (always reported; may be blocking depending on citation_target):

  • - Global recommended target: >= <N> ...
  • - Gap to recommended: <K>

Recommended prioritization (scope-safe):

  • allowed_bibkeys_selected → allowed_bibkeys_mapped → allowed_bibkeys_chapter
  • Use allowed_bibkeys_global only for:
    • benchmarks/protocol papers
    • widely-used datasets/suites
    • cross-cutting surveys/method papers referenced across chapters

How this connects to writing (LLM-first)

After you generate the budget report:

  • Apply it using citation-injector (LLM edits to output/DRAFT.md, NO NEW FACTS).
  • Then run draft-polisher to remove any “budget dump voice” while keeping citation keys unchanged.

Important: citation-injector is LLM-first. Its script is validation-only.

Workflow

  1. Diagnose the global situation
  • Read output/DRAFT.md and estimate the “unique-key gap” (or use pipeline-auditor’s FAIL reason).
  1. Allocate budgets per H3 (scope-first)
  • Use outline/outline.yml to enumerate H3s in paper order.
  • For each H3, read its allowed key sets from outline/writer_context_packs.jsonl.
  • Pick a small set of unused keys that strengthen positioning without requiring new claims.
  1. Write output/CITATION_BUDGET_REPORT.md Required structure:
  • - Status: PASS|FAIL
  • - Global target (policy; blocking): >= <N> ...
  • - Gap: <K>
  • ## Summary (gap + strategy)
  • ## Per-subsection budgets (H3 id/title → suggested keys → placement hint)

Script (optional; deterministic report generator)

If you want a deterministic first-pass budget report, run the helper script. Treat it as a baseline and refine the plan as needed.

Quick Start

  • uv run python .codex/skills/citation-diversifier/scripts/run.py --help
  • uv run python .codex/skills/citation-diversifier/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace>

All Options

  • --workspace <dir>
  • --unit-id <U###> (optional)
  • --inputs <semicolon-separated> (rare override; prefer defaults)
  • --outputs <semicolon-separated> (rare override; default writes output/CITATION_BUDGET_REPORT.md)
  • --checkpoint <C#> (optional)

Examples

  • Default IO:
    • uv run python .codex/skills/citation-diversifier/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace>

Done criteria

  • output/CITATION_BUDGET_REPORT.md exists and has actionable, in-scope budgets.
  • After applying the plan via citation-injector, pipeline-auditor no longer FAILs on global unique citations.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Internal template for creating or refactoring a skill into the repository's reference-first shape. **Trigger**: reference-first template, blueprint skill, create a reusable skill, refactor a script-heavy skill. **Use when**: you need a lean `SKILL.md`, explicit `references/`, machine-readable `assets/`, and a minimal deterministic `run.py`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Download a small corpus of open-access arXiv survey/review PDFs about agentic systems and extract text for style learning.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Extract per-subsection “anchor facts” (NO PROSE) from evidence packs so the writer is forced to include concrete numbers/benchmarks/limitations instead of generic summaries.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Curate reader-facing survey tables for the Appendix (clean layout + high information density), using only in-scope evidence and existing citation keys.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Build a final, machine-readable argument snapshot from current H3 sections and refresh section fingerprints before merge.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Audit one research Workspace for declared Unit outputs and Pipeline target Artifacts, writing `output/CONTRACT_REPORT.md`; use for mid-Run coverage snapshots or final delivery completeness, not deep provenance integrity.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

See all skills by WILLOSCAR

Report a problem with this skill