Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

human-checkpoint

Review and record one pending human checkpoint in a research Workspace; use when a HUMAN Unit is blocked on an `Approve C*` decision, and never treat silence or artifact existence as approval.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.1 KB
  • scripts/run.py1.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Human Checkpoint

A checkpoint is consent, not a formatting step. It binds a named human Decision to the exact Artifacts and constraints reviewed before execution may continue.

Inputs

  • DECISIONS.md.
  • UNITS.csv and STATUS.md for the active checkpoint.
  • Artifacts declared by the locked Pipeline for that checkpoint.

Outputs

  • Updated DECISIONS.md.
  • A checkpoint Decision in the Run ledger.

Steps

1. Identify the pending checkpoint

Inspect STATUS.md, UNITS.csv, and the active runner message. Select the first blocked HUMAN Unit and its C* identifier. If multiple checkpoints appear active or the checklist is missing, stop and repair the projection before approving anything.

Completion criterion: exactly one pending checkpoint and its owning HUMAN Unit are identified.

2. Review the declared Artifacts

Read the locked Pipeline's checkpoint contract and inspect every named Artifact. Record requested constraints or scope changes in the checkpoint block before approval; do not silently modify reader-facing content as part of sign-off.

Completion criterion: the reviewer can name the Artifacts inspected and any constraints attached to the Decision.

3. Record approval through the adapter

Use the Pipeline adapter so the Markdown checkbox and machine Decision ledger remain synchronized:

uv run python scripts/pipeline.py approve \
  --workspace workspaces/<name> \
  --checkpoint <C*>

Do not infer approval from chat silence, a completed Artifact, or an existing but unchecked checklist item.

Completion criterion: DECISIONS.md contains [x] Approve C* and the Run ledger records checkpoint.approved for the same checkpoint.

4. Hand execution back to the Runner

Resume through the Pipeline adapter. The Harness may complete the HUMAN Unit and expose the next eligible Unit; this Skill does not execute downstream semantic work itself.

Completion criterion: the checkpoint is no longer the active blocker, or one new specific blocker is visible in durable Workspace state.

Context Pointers

  • The locked pipelines/*.pipeline.md owns checkpoint purpose and required review Artifacts.
  • DECISIONS.md is the human-readable Decision surface.
  • .harness/decisions.jsonl is the machine-readable history; update it through the adapter rather than by hand.
  • Use checkpoint-brief to recreate a post-route checkpoint review block.
  • scripts/run.py is a runner-compatibility helper that only toggles the Markdown checkbox. Prefer scripts/pipeline.py approve, which also records the machine Decision.

Troubleshooting

  • If the approvals checklist is missing after C0, materialize the review block with checkpoint-brief before approval. Use pipeline-router only for the initial C0 route.
  • If reviewed upstream Artifacts later change, expect the Harness to revoke the stale approval and request a new Decision.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Internal template for creating or refactoring a skill into the repository's reference-first shape. **Trigger**: reference-first template, blueprint skill, create a reusable skill, refactor a script-heavy skill. **Use when**: you need a lean `SKILL.md`, explicit `references/`, machine-readable `assets/`, and a minimal deterministic `run.py`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Download a small corpus of open-access arXiv survey/review PDFs about agentic systems and extract text for style learning.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Extract per-subsection “anchor facts” (NO PROSE) from evidence packs so the writer is forced to include concrete numbers/benchmarks/limitations instead of generic summaries.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Curate reader-facing survey tables for the Appendix (clean layout + high information density), using only in-scope evidence and existing citation keys.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Build a final, machine-readable argument snapshot from current H3 sections and refresh section fingerprints before merge.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Audit one research Workspace for declared Unit outputs and Pipeline target Artifacts, writing `output/CONTRACT_REPORT.md`; use for mid-Run coverage snapshots or final delivery completeness, not deep provenance integrity.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

See all skills by WILLOSCAR

Report a problem with this skill