Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

post-merge-voice-gate

Post-merge paper-voice gate: inspect the reader-facing draft for planner-talk and axis-label artifacts, then route fixes to the actual source.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB
  • scripts/run.py8.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Post-merge Voice Gate

Triggers & routing

  • Trigger: post-merge voice gate, merge voice gate, transition leakage, planner talk, 合并后口吻门, 过渡句污染.
  • Use when: section-merger has produced output/DRAFT.md and you want to ensure merge-injected text won't drag the draft into generator voice before polishing.

Purpose: catch the highest-impact "automation tells" that appear after merge.

Why this exists:

  • Merge can expose planner-talk in section prose or explicitly enabled transitions.
  • Even a few planner-talk or axis-label sentences can make an otherwise solid draft read like a generator.
  • Fixes should land at the earliest responsible artifact: normally the owning section, or outline/transitions.md only when insertion was enabled.

This skill is a gate:

  • It writes a report (output/POST_MERGE_VOICE_REPORT.md).
  • If FAIL, it also appends to output/QUALITY_GATE.md so the workspace remains debuggable.

Role prompt: Voice Gatekeeper (paper voice, no new facts)

You are the post-merge voice gatekeeper for a survey draft.

Your job is to detect high-signal generator voice in the merged draft:
- planner-talk transitions ("To keep the chapter...", "The remaining uncertainty is...")
- slide/navigation narration ("Next, we move...", "We now turn...")
- axis-label slash lists (A / B / C; planning/memory) used as prose

Rules:
- do not change the draft directly; route fixes to the source file
- do not invent facts or citations
- keep fixes minimal and content-bearing (argument bridges, not navigation)

Output:
- a short PASS/FAIL report with a routing plan

Inputs

  • output/DRAFT.md
  • outline/transitions.md

outline/transitions.md is an optional planning artifact by default. It is treated as a possible reader-facing source only when outline/transitions.insert_h3.ok or outline/transitions.insert_h2.ok exists.

Output

  • output/POST_MERGE_VOICE_REPORT.md (always written)

What this gate checks (high-signal only)

  • Planner-talk transition stems (construction notes that read like comments in the paper body)
  • Slash-list axis markers in reader-facing draft prose (A / B / C)
  • Slide/navigation narration that should be argument bridges

Rewrite triggers (if you see these, FAIL and route)

These stems are high-signal generator voice once injected into the draft body:

  • "To keep ..." / "To keep the chapter..."
  • "The remaining uncertainty is ..."
  • "as the comparison lens" / "as the reference point"
  • slash-list axis labels using / (e.g., "retrieval / index / write policy")

Routing rules (earliest responsible artifact)

  • If transition insertion is enabled and the offending phrase appears in outline/transitions.md:
    • Fix: rerun transition-weaver (or hand-edit outline/transitions.md), then rerun section-merger.
  • Otherwise (phrase only appears in the draft body):
    • Fix: route to writer-selfloop / subsection-polisher / draft-polisher depending on where it occurs.

Mini rewrite examples (do not copy verbatim)

Bad (planner talk, reads like a build note):

  • To keep the chapter's comparison lens explicit, we now turn to ...

Better (argument bridge, content-bearing):

  • Once interface contracts fix what actions are executable, the next bottleneck is how agents choose among those actions under uncertainty and budget constraints.

Bad (axis-label slash list):

  • ... under mechanism/architecture/data trade-offs ...

Better (natural prose):

  • ... under trade-offs between architectural choices and the data/feedback available during interaction ...

Script (optional; deterministic gate)

Quick Start

  • uv run python .codex/skills/post-merge-voice-gate/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace>

All Options

  • --workspace <dir>: workspace root
  • --unit-id <U###>: unit id (optional; for logs)
  • --inputs <semicolon-separated>: override inputs (rare; default: output/DRAFT.md;outline/transitions.md)
  • --outputs <semicolon-separated>: override outputs (rare; default: output/POST_MERGE_VOICE_REPORT.md)
  • --checkpoint <C#>: checkpoint id (optional; for logs)

Examples

  • Run right after section-merger (recommended):
    • uv run python .codex/skills/post-merge-voice-gate/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace>

Notes

  • The script is analysis-only; it never edits content.
  • On FAIL it writes output/POST_MERGE_VOICE_REPORT.md and appends a short record to output/QUALITY_GATE.md.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Internal template for creating or refactoring a skill into the repository's reference-first shape. **Trigger**: reference-first template, blueprint skill, create a reusable skill, refactor a script-heavy skill. **Use when**: you need a lean `SKILL.md`, explicit `references/`, machine-readable `assets/`, and a minimal deterministic `run.py`.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Download a small corpus of open-access arXiv survey/review PDFs about agentic systems and extract text for style learning.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Extract per-subsection “anchor facts” (NO PROSE) from evidence packs so the writer is forced to include concrete numbers/benchmarks/limitations instead of generic summaries.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Curate reader-facing survey tables for the Appendix (clean layout + high information density), using only in-scope evidence and existing citation keys.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Build a final, machine-readable argument snapshot from current H3 sections and refresh section fingerprints before merge.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

Audit one research Workspace for declared Unit outputs and Pipeline target Artifacts, writing `output/CONTRACT_REPORT.md`; use for mid-Run coverage snapshots or final delivery completeness, not deep provenance integrity.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills515Updated Oct 5, 2026

See all skills by WILLOSCAR

Report a problem with this skill