Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

onequery-bug

Diagnose GitHub bug reports in wordbricks/onequery. Use when given a GitHub issue URL from wordbricks/onequery and asked to decide next steps such as verifying against the repo, requesting more info, or explaining why it is not a bug; follow any additional user-provided instructions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Works withGitHub
See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

OneQuery Bug

Overview

Diagnose a OneQuery GitHub bug report and decide the next action: verify against sources, request more info, or explain why it is not a bug.

Workflow

  1. Confirm the input
  • Require a GitHub issue URL that points to github.com/wordbricks/onequery/issues/….
  • If the URL is missing or not in the right repo, ask the user for the correct link.
  1. Network access
  • Always access the issue over the network immediately, even if you think access is blocked or unavailable.
  • Prefer the GitHub API over HTML pages because the HTML is noisy:
    • Issue: https://api.github.com/repos/wordbricks/onequery/issues/<number>
    • Comments: https://api.github.com/repos/wordbricks/onequery/issues/<number>/comments
  • If the environment requires explicit approval, request it on demand via the tool and continue without additional user prompting.
  • Only if the network attempt fails after requesting approval, explain what you can do offline (e.g., draft a response template) and ask how to proceed.
  1. Read the issue
  • Use the GitHub API responses (issue + comments) as the source of truth rather than scraping the HTML issue page.
  • Extract: title, body, repro steps, expected vs actual, environment, logs, and any attachments.
  • Note whether the report already includes logs or session details.
  • If the report includes a thread ID, mention it in the summary and use it to look up the logs and session details if you have access to them.
  1. Summarize the bug before investigating
  • Before inspecting code, docs, or logs in depth, write a short summary of the report in your own words.
  • Include the reported behavior, expected behavior, repro steps, environment, and what evidence is already attached or missing.
  1. Decide the course of action
  • Verify with sources when the report is specific and likely reproducible. Inspect relevant Codex files (or mention the files to inspect if access is unavailable).
  • Request more information when the report is vague, missing repro steps, or lacks logs/environment.
  • Explain not a bug when the report contradicts current behavior or documented constraints (cite the evidence from the issue and any local sources you checked).
  1. Respond
  • Provide a concise report of your findings and next steps.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

wordbricks/onequery17Updated Jul 30, 2026

A scoring scale for evaluating how well a CLI is designed for AI agents, based on the "Rewrite Your CLI for AI Agents" principles.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

wordbricks/onequery17Updated Jul 30, 2026

Score a repository's agentic legibility from repo-visible evidence only. Use when Codex needs to audit how easy a codebase is for coding agents to discover, bootstrap, validate, and navigate, especially for harness-engineering reviews, developer-experience audits, repo cleanup, or before/after comparisons after improving docs, tooling, or architectural constraints.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

wordbricks/onequery17Updated Jul 30, 2026

astro

Free

Expert in Astro framework with static generation and partial hydration patterns

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

wordbricks/onequery17Updated Jul 30, 2026

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep watching open PRs so fresh review feedback is surfaced promptly. Use when the user asks Codex to monitor a PR, watch CI, handle review comments, or keep an eye on failures and feedback on an open PR.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

wordbricks/onequery17Updated Jul 30, 2026

Adopt better-result in an existing TypeScript codebase. Use when replacing try/catch, Promise rejection handling, null sentinels, or thrown domain exceptions with typed Result workflows.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

wordbricks/onequery17Updated Jul 30, 2026

See all skills by wordbricks

Report a problem with this skill