Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

extract

Extract and consolidate reusable components, design tokens, and patterns into your design system. Identifies opportunities for systematic reuse and enriches your component library. Use when the user asks to create components, refactor repeated UI patterns, build a design system, or extract tokens.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Identify reusable patterns, components, and design tokens, then extract and consolidate them into the design system for systematic reuse.

Discover

Analyze the target area to identify extraction opportunities:

  1. Find the design system: Locate your design system, component library, or shared UI directory (grep for "design system", "ui", "components", etc.). Understand its structure:

    • Component organization and naming conventions
    • Design token structure (if any)
    • Documentation patterns
    • Import/export conventions

    CRITICAL: If no design system exists, ask before creating one. Understand the preferred location and structure first.

  2. Identify patterns: Look for:

    • Repeated components: Similar UI patterns used multiple times (buttons, cards, inputs, etc.)
    • Hard-coded values: Colors, spacing, typography, shadows that should be tokens
    • Inconsistent variations: Multiple implementations of the same concept (3 different button styles)
    • Reusable patterns: Layout patterns, composition patterns, interaction patterns worth systematizing
  3. Assess value: Not everything should be extracted. Consider:

    • Is this used 3+ times, or likely to be reused?
    • Would systematizing this improve consistency?
    • Is this a general pattern or context-specific?
    • What's the maintenance cost vs benefit?

Plan Extraction

Create a systematic extraction plan:

  • Components to extract: Which UI elements become reusable components?
  • Tokens to create: Which hard-coded values become design tokens?
  • Variants to support: What variations does each component need?
  • Naming conventions: Component names, token names, prop names that match existing patterns
  • Migration path: How to refactor existing uses to consume the new shared versions

IMPORTANT: Design systems grow incrementally. Extract what's clearly reusable now, not everything that might someday be reusable.

Extract & Enrich

Build improved, reusable versions:

  • Components: Create well-designed components with:

    • Clear props API with sensible defaults
    • Proper variants for different use cases
    • Accessibility built in (ARIA, keyboard navigation, focus management)
    • Documentation and usage examples
  • Design tokens: Create tokens with:

    • Clear naming (primitive vs semantic)
    • Proper hierarchy and organization
    • Documentation of when to use each token
  • Patterns: Document patterns with:

    • When to use this pattern
    • Code examples
    • Variations and combinations

NEVER:

  • Extract one-off, context-specific implementations without generalization
  • Create components so generic they're useless
  • Extract without considering existing design system conventions
  • Skip proper TypeScript types or prop documentation
  • Create tokens for every single value (tokens should have semantic meaning)

Migrate

Replace existing uses with the new shared versions:

  • Find all instances: Search for the patterns you've extracted
  • Replace systematically: Update each use to consume the shared version
  • Test thoroughly: Ensure visual and functional parity
  • Delete dead code: Remove the old implementations

Document

Update design system documentation:

  • Add new components to the component library
  • Document token usage and values
  • Add examples and guidelines
  • Update any Storybook or component catalog

Remember: A good design system is a living system. Extract patterns as they emerge, enrich them thoughtfully, and maintain them consistently.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

adapt

Free

Adapt designs to work across different screen sizes, devices, contexts, or platforms. Implements breakpoints, fluid layouts, and touch targets. Use when the user mentions responsive design, mobile layouts, breakpoints, viewport adaptation, or cross-device compatibility.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

youranreus/note12Updated Aug 6, 2026

Review a feature and enhance it with purposeful animations, micro-interactions, and motion effects that improve usability and delight. Use when the user mentions adding animation, transitions, micro-interactions, motion design, hover effects, or making the UI feel more alive.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

youranreus/note12Updated Aug 6, 2026

Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

youranreus/note12Updated Aug 6, 2026

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

youranreus/note12Updated Aug 6, 2026

audit

Free

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

youranreus/note12Updated Aug 6, 2026

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

youranreus/note12Updated Aug 6, 2026

See all skills by youranreus

Report a problem with this skill