Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

competition-forensic-timeline

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for DFIR chronology, cross-artifact correlation, persistence chains, and incident timeline reconstruction. Use when the user asks to build a forensic timeline, correlate EVTX, PCAP, registry, disk, memory, mailbox, or browser artifacts, explain the order of attacker actions, or pinpoint the stage where the decisive artifact appears. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (3)

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml394 B
  • references/forensic-timeline.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Competition Forensic Timeline

Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.

Use this skill when the hard part is not finding one artifact, but turning many artifacts into one replayable chronology.

Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.

Quick Start

  1. Pick the smallest reliable anchor: first execution, first logon, first network session, first file write, or first mailbox action.
  2. Normalize timestamps, time zones, hostnames, users, process IDs, message IDs, and file paths before correlating.
  3. Build one minimal chain from foothold to persistence, execution, access, or exfiltration.
  4. Separate confirmed event order from inferred gaps.
  5. Reproduce the decisive timeline segment that yields the artifact or privilege conclusion.

Workflow

1. Establish Timeline Anchors

  • Collect only the active surfaces: EVTX, Sysmon, registry, Amcache, prefetch, browser artifacts, mail traces, PCAPs, memory, or filesystem metadata.
  • Record clock source, timezone, and any drift or truncation that could reorder events.
  • Link shared identifiers across sources: PID, logon ID, GUID, message ID, hostname, username, IP, or hash.

2. Correlate The Execution Graph

  • Track process tree, service or task creation, network sessions, file writes, registry changes, mailbox rules, or token use as one path.
  • Distinguish causal edges from coincidence by matching identifiers and adjacency, not just nearby timestamps.
  • Keep raw artifact and parsed summary side by side so every step can be traced back.

3. Compress To The Decisive Story

  • Reduce the timeline to the smallest sequence that proves initial access, persistence, lateral movement, collection, or artifact recovery.
  • Call out missing validation steps separately instead of mixing them into confirmed chronology.
  • If the task becomes mainly about malware config extraction or a Windows pivot edge, switch to the tighter specialized skill.

Read This Reference

  • Load references/forensic-timeline.md for anchor selection, cross-source correlation, and evidence packaging.
  • If the hard part is packet reassembly, protocol framing, or transferred-object extraction from a capture, prefer $competition-pcap-protocol.

What To Preserve

  • Source file paths, event IDs, logon IDs, message IDs, PIDs, hashes, and timestamps with timezone noted
  • One compact timeline table or ordered list for the decisive segment
  • Raw artifacts, parsed output, and inferred edges kept separate

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

A/B 测试设计与分析时使用。适用于产品实验、功能验证、转化率优化。融合假设驱动 + 样本量计算 + 置信度判断。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow53Updated May 19, 2026

上线前业务方/产品方验收时使用。适用于功能交付确认、UAT、发布会签。融合 BDD Given-When-Then、Specification by Example、ATDD。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow53Updated May 19, 2026

设计无障碍可访问的界面时使用。适用于满足 WCAG 标准、键盘导航、屏幕阅读器支持。优先使用 WCAG 2.2 AA 级标准 + 键盘 + 焦点 + 对比度 + ARIA。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow53Updated May 19, 2026

实现可访问性(无障碍)时使用。覆盖 WCAG 2.2 AA / ARIA / 键盘导航 / 屏幕阅读器 / 颜色对比 / 焦点管理。融合 React Aria / Radix UI / Headless UI 实践 + axe-core 自动化测试。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow53Updated May 19, 2026

AI 模型部署时使用。适用于推理服务 / GPU / TensorRT / 监控 / 扩缩容。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow53Updated May 19, 2026

数据分析报告输出时使用。适用于业务分析报告、周报、专项分析、决策支持。融合洞察 + 建议 + 行动项。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhaoxuya520/AI-Fullstack-Delivery-Workflow53Updated May 19, 2026

See all skills by zhaoxuya520

Report a problem with this skill