Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

completeness-auditor

Audit whether the semantic evidence required by the active lean or submission profile exists and is current, without requiring one verbose artifact per skill or an arbitrary number of pass bullets.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Purpose

Check deliverable evidence, not whether every invoked skill left a ceremonial report.

Lean Checks

Per active Qx, require as applicable:

  • manifest;
  • method card;
  • human decision ledger;
  • risk-probe summary;
  • latest run summary.

Lean completeness does not require final reports, freeze, paper, or G6 artifacts.

Submission Checks

Per Qx require:

  • final method explanation;
  • current language review JSON with all required named checks passing;
  • final result analysis;
  • robustness report;
  • solution package;
  • current frozen numbers;
  • paper section and referenced figures.

Globally require symbol table, assumptions, references, consistency audit, completeness audit, and QA report.

Workflow

  1. Read rigor_profile.
  2. Resolve active Qx from manifests or artifacts.
  3. Check required artifacts and semantic fields.
  4. Check staleness only against materially cited evidence.
  5. Accept documented legacy equivalents during migration.
  6. Save paper/audits/completeness_audit.md only in submission/final mode.

Status

  • PRESENT: required evidence exists and is current.
  • MISSING: required evidence absent.
  • INSUFFICIENT: artifact exists but required semantic fields/checks are missing.
  • STALE: cited material evidence changed after approval/review.
  • NOT_APPLICABLE: justified by task/profile.

Rules

  • Do not require ≥5 prose pass items.
  • Do not require a report just because a skill ran.
  • Do not mark a decision stale for unrelated code, formatting, or file changes.
  • Do not treat legacy artifact count as proof of semantic completeness.
  • Do not repair artifacts during audit.

Verification

  • Requirements match the active profile.
  • Every gap names the missing evidence and producer/owner.
  • Staleness links to a material changed source.
  • Final verdict is PASSED only when all submission requirements are satisfied.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Detect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Run scoped or final cross-media consistency checks for mathematical-modeling artifacts, comparing canonical numbers, symbols, parameters, decisions, files, and paper claims without performing full-workspace audits for low-risk changes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Build one compact choice card at a genuine mathematical-modeling judgment point. Use before method screening, after a meaningful experiment, or before final claim/freeze approval so the human chooses the trade-off while AI handles mechanical consequences.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Build the authoritative final method explanation for a submission-ready subquestion from the method card, human decision ledger, code plan, final results, and robustness evidence.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

See all skills by zhnnky329

Report a problem with this skill