비즈니스 스킬

Escalate blocked scraping campaigns with provider-neutral proxy rotation — decide between datacenter, residential, and mobile pools, integrate rotation with scrapling, configure session stickiness for stateful flows, monitor cost and health, and stay inside legal and ethical boundaries. Use as the next step after `headless-web-scraping` client-side stealth (StealthyFetcher, rate limiting, robots.txt) is insufficient and traffic is legitimate.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan a comprehensive spectroscopic analysis campaign by defining the analytical question, assessing sample characteristics, selecting appropriate techniques using a decision matrix, planning sample preparation for each technique, sequencing analyses from non-destructive to destructive, and defining success criteria with a cross-validation strategy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan a complete EU/DACH relocation timeline with dependency mapping between bureaucratic steps, deadline tracking, and country-specific procedure identification. Use when planning a move between EU/DACH countries, relocating from a non-EU country to an EU/DACH destination, coordinating employment-based relocation with employer HR, managing a relocation with tight deadlines, or when needing a single document that maps the entire relocation process end-to-end.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implement electronic signatures compliant with 21 CFR Part 11 Subpart C and EU Annex 11. Covers signature manifestation (signer, date/time, meaning), signature-to-record binding, biometric vs non-biometric controls, policy creation, and user certification requirements. Use when a computerized system requires legally binding electronic signatures for GxP records, when replacing wet-ink signatures in regulated workflows, when implementing batch release or document approval workflows, or when a regulatory gap reveals missing signature controls.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Statically enforce a privacy/redaction boundary on an artifact tree before publication, the way an AST checker enforces a code contract. Builds a two-tier gate — a shape-based deny-list (regex over identifier shapes) plus a structure-aware tier that parses JSON/HTML/SVG/Markdown/code and asserts sensitive content cannot appear in meaningful positions — with a strict exit-code contract, label-only output that never echoes the patterns themselves, and false-positive narrowing instead of suppressions. Use when gating a public mirror, a disclosure draft, a wire-capture export, or any artifact that must pass a leak check before it ships, and when a plain line-grep is too coarse to trust.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create R-based pictogram glyphs for skill, agent, or team icons in the visualization layer. Covers concept sketching, ggplot2 layer composition using the primitives library, color strategy, registration in the appropriate glyph mapping file and manifest, rendering via the build pipeline, and visual verification of the neon-glow output. Use when a new entity has been added and needs a visual icon for the force-graph visualization, an existing glyph needs replacement, or when batch-creating glyphs for a new domain.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Map the intellectual property landscape for a technology domain or product area. Covers patent cluster analysis, white space identification, competitor IP portfolio assessment, freedom-to-operate preliminary screening, and strategic IP positioning recommendations. Use before starting R&D in a new technology area, when evaluating market entry against incumbents with strong patent portfolios, preparing for investment due diligence, informing a patent filing strategy, or assessing freedom-to-operate risk for a new product.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematically identify whether a GPU kernel is compute-bound, memory-bound, or latency-bound using roofline analysis, occupancy calculations, compute/load ratio per tile, and SASS instruction inspection. Produces a decision matrix for optimization strategy selection (cp.async, warp interleaving, tiling, double-buffering, or CuAssembler hand-tuning).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan and freeze workflow execution by creating an Execution Contract, setting PLAN_FROZEN/CURRENT_ROLE, and updating PROJECT_STATE decisions and Top 3. Use when starting workflow delivery, re-planning after unfreeze, or when scope/constraints change before execution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review execution against the frozen Execution Contract, produce Evidence/Gaps, and decide pass or unfreeze. Use after ac-execute or at milestone acceptance gates.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Execute a frozen workflow contract and collect evidence by implementing only approved scope/files and checks. Use when PLAN_FROZEN=true and Execution Contract is complete, then hand off to review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

用户想预防某个潜在风险或问题时; 当系统出现早期预警信号但尚未爆发时; 当已出现问题需要防止恶化和扩散时; 当需要建立长期防护机制时。 不适用于: 紧急危机处理(系统正在崩溃, 需要急救而非预防); 纯历史回顾 (分析过去发生了什么但不涉及未来预防)。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive US stock analysis including fundamental analysis (financial metrics, business quality, valuation), technical analysis (indicators, chart patterns, support/resistance), stock comparisons, and investment report generation. Use when user requests analysis of US stock tickers (e.g., "analyze AAPL", "compare TSLA vs NVDA", "give me a report on Microsoft"), evaluation of financial metrics, technical chart analysis, or investment recommendations for American stocks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when an output artifact, template, schema, example, or handoff field must stay aligned across commands, skills, docs, and validators.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prospective failure analysis using Gary Klein's pre-mortem technique. Assumes complete failure, works backward to identify risks, leading indicators, and circuit breakers. Counters optimism bias by forcing systematic exploration of failure modes before they materialize. Use for project plans, architecture decisions, technology adoption, business strategy, or feature launches. Triggers on "리스크", "위험", "실패하면", "swing-mortem", "뭐가 잘못될 수 있어", "risk", "what could go wrong", "걱정되는 점", "failure modes", "리스크 분석", "위험 분석".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user needs to finalize a deal, handle tough objections, or create a "Mutual Action Plan" to close a sale.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Specialized business strategy prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output formats) for consulting, M&A, corporate strategy, and strategic planning tasks. Use when building prompts for deal evaluation, due diligence, portfolio strategy, business model analysis, board narratives, investment cases, market entry plans, or strategic options assessments. Trigger on: "build a prompt for M&A analysis," "due diligence prompt," "board narrative," "investment case," "market entry strategy," "strategic options," "portfolio strategy prompt," "business model analysis prompt," "consulting-style analysis." Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or for auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when an answer is wanted from one named seat only: breaking, business, career, codebase, human, impact, innovation, moat, rent-seeking, skeptic, or stability. Not for multi-lens synthesis: use prism. Not for rebuilding from primitives: use from-first-principle.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when C or C++ code needs memory-safety or undefined-behavior guarantees proved with CBMC, or ACSL contracts checked with Frama-C Eva or WP. Not for choosing the proof policy: use proof-driven.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when crossing a public API boundary, guarding complex invariants, or hardening untrusted input or integration seams. Not for remote or irreversible changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

应用从 AI for Everyone 蒸馏出的「AI战略护城河 — 用AI构建可持续竞争优势」方法论。Use when the user needs practical guidance, diagnosis, workflow design, decision support, or an action plan related to ai-strategy-moat.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-step recovery strategy to turn a specific negative review into a positive outcome

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-platform review aggregation and thematic analysis for any business

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user is working a B2B SaaS deal from qualified opportunity to closed-won — preparing discovery calls, structuring demos or POCs, handling a specific objection, qualifying with MEDDIC/MEDDPICC/SPICED, building mutual action plans, navigating negotiation or procurement, or reviewing pipeline health, forecast accuracy, and deal velocity. Not for finding or prospecting new leads (use prospecting) or upstream positioning (use product-position).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.