디자인 스킬

Designs genomics experiments so technical nuisance variation (batch, lane, plate, flow cell, operator, reagent lot, processing day) is balanced against the biological variable of interest and therefore estimable rather than confounded, using constrained sample-to-batch assignment (designit, OSAT), the confounder/mediator/collider distinction, and the principle that no post-hoc correction recovers a fully confounded design. Covers detecting hidden batches with surrogate variable analysis, a decision table for downstream correction (ComBat-seq, RUVSeq, SVA) whose execution is deferred to differential-expression/batch-correction, and reproducibility metadata. Use when assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates, avoiding batch-condition confounding, deciding whether a design is salvageable by correction, choosing a correction method, or estimating the number of hidden batches. For the experimental unit, randomization, and blocking concepts see experimental-design/randomization-blocking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs and analyzes pooled prime-editor (PE) screens for installing precise genetic variants without bystander confounding. Covers pegRNA design with PRIDICT and PRIDICT2 (Mathis 2023/2024) for predicting per-pegRNA editing efficiency, pegRNA architecture (spacer + scaffold + PBS + RTT), PE2 / PE3 / PE3b / PEmax / PEAR variants, MOSAIC in situ saturation mutagenesis (Hsu JY et al 2024 bioRxiv), the PRIME pooled-screen methodology (Erwood/Doman 2023 Nat Biotechnol 41:885; ~3,699 ClinVar variant screens), chromatin context as a primary determinant of PE efficiency, scaffold-incorporation and indel byproduct quantification with CRISPResso2, and the cross-modal validation strategy of PE + base-editor screens for variant function. Use when designing a pegRNA library for variant installation, choosing between BE and PE for a specific edit, predicting pegRNA efficiency before library synthesis, analyzing PE screen output, distinguishing intended-edit from scaffold-incorporation, or scaling PE screens to thousands of variants.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes base-editing screens for variant function. Covers library design (Sanson 2020 GRACE, Hanna 2021 BRCA1/2 SNV scanning, Cuella-Martin 2021), CBE vs ABE chemistry choice (BE3/BE4 vs ABE7.10/ABE8.20/ABE8e), editing-window math (positions 4-8 from PAM-distal end, wider for ABE8e), bystander-edit quantification and the variant-call ambiguity it creates, sgRNA-efficiency filtering before hit calling, indel byproduct interpretation, the substitution-vs-indel diagnostic, variant annotation against ClinVar / COSMIC, and the Broad be-validation-pipeline. Use when designing a BE variant screen, choosing CBE vs ABE for a specific edit, interpreting bystander-confounded hits, distinguishing functional signal from indel artifact, integrating CRISPResso2 output with screen scoring, or deciding BE vs PE for SNV installation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes CRISPR drug-modifier (chemogenomic) screens with drugZ (Li & Hart 2019 Genome Med), a bidirectional Z-score method that identifies synthetic-lethal sensitizing genes and resistance-conferring suppressor genes from vehicle vs drug comparisons. Covers vehicle-anchored design (not Day-0), the bidirectional Z math giving 2-3x sensitivity over MAGeCK / STARS / edgeR / RIGER on drug screens, per-gene sumZ and normZ, synth (sensitizer) vs supp (suppressor) FDR, multi-dose handling, integration with control sgRNAs, and comparison with MAGeCK MLE with dose covariate. Use when running a drug-modifier CRISPR screen, identifying sensitizing or resistance genes for a drug candidate, choosing drugZ vs MAGeCK MLE for chemogenomic analysis, troubleshooting low-effect drug screens where MAGeCK lacks sensitivity, or designing a drug-screen layout (vehicle vs drug arms).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes single-cell pooled CRISPR screens (Perturb-seq, CROP-seq, Perturb-CITE-seq, ECCITE-seq, multiome) where each cell carries an sgRNA and a scRNA-seq / surface-protein / chromatin readout. Covers experimental design (direct-capture Perturb-seq Dixit 2016 vs CROP-seq 3'UTR-barcoded Datlinger 2017 vs ECCITE-seq vs Multiome), MOI for sgRNA assignment, escaper-cell filtering (Mixscape, Papalexi 2021), SCEPTRE NB GLM + permutation for low-MOI (Barry 2024 Genome Biol 25:124), the Pertpy framework, factor decomposition, genome-scale Perturb-seq (Replogle 2022 Cell, 2.5M cells), and per-perturbation single-cell DE. Use when running a single-cell CRISPR screen, choosing direct-capture vs CROP-seq architecture, filtering escaper cells, performing single-cell DE, integrating Perturb-seq with pathway analysis, scaling to GW CRISPRi via Replogle protocol, or analyzing multi-omics screens.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs and analyzes in vivo CRISPR screens in animal tumor models, organoids, and immune-cell adoptive transfers. Covers bottleneck math (250x cells/sgRNA requires ~25M cells implanted; impossible for most syngeneic models, forcing focused libraries), focused library design (Manguso 2017 Nature 547:413 immune screen; Chen 2015 tumor screens), CRISPR-StAR intrinsic-control screening (Uijttewaal 2025 Nat Biotechnol 43:1848), clonal-dynamics-limited detection, tumor-explant DNA recovery, syngeneic vs xenograft vs PDX considerations, and the relationship to downstream MAGeCK / drugZ analysis. Use when designing in vivo CRISPR screens for tumor / immune / metastasis biology, choosing focused vs genome-wide for animal models, addressing bottleneck-induced clonal collapse, picking the syngeneic / xenograft / PDX model, integrating in vivo with in vitro results, or applying CRISPR-StAR for animal experiments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Batch effect correction for CRISPR screens covering ComBat empirical-Bayes, RUV, SVA, control-sgRNA normalization, and the model-based alternative of including batch as a covariate in MAGeCK MLE or Chronos. Covers screen-specific batch sources (passage cohort, library lot, infection day, sequencing run, Cas9 lot, FBS lot), PCA + variance-decomposition diagnostic to decide if correction is needed, when correction harms biology by over-correcting condition into batch, limma removeBatchEffect for visualization-only correction, and relationship to multi-condition design matrices. Use when combining screens for joint analysis, when passage cohort confounds biology, when DepMap-style panels need Chronos with batch covariates, when picking ComBat vs RUV, or when correction harms biology and should be replaced with explicit covariate modeling.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs pooled sgRNA libraries for CRISPR knockout, interference (CRISPRi), activation (CRISPRa), Cas12a multiplex, base-editor, and prime-editor screens. Covers on-target scoring (Rule Set 2, Azimuth, DeepSpCas9, CRISPRon), off-target scoring (CFD, MIT), TSS-relative positioning for CRISPRi/a (Horlbeck, Dolcetto, Calabrese), PAM-variant chemistries, control-guide composition, oligo cloning architecture, and library QC. Use when choosing a genome-wide library (GeCKOv2 vs Avana vs Brunello vs TKOv3 vs Inzolia), designing a focused or paralog-focused custom library, picking CRISPRi vs CRISPRa TSS windows, deciding control-guide proportions, or diagnosing library skew and dropout in a freshly cloned pool.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Discover RBP binding motifs from CLIP-seq peaks or single-nucleotide crosslink sites using HOMER, MEME/STREME, kpLogo, mCross (CL-position-registered motifs), PEKA (positional k-mer enrichment), RBPamp (affinity), and RNA Bind-n-Seq (RBNS) cross-validation. Use when characterizing RBP sequence specificity, registering motifs to crosslink positions, validating in vivo CLIP motifs against in vitro RBNS Kd, reconciling motif disagreements across tools, or correcting for the uracil crosslinking bias that contaminates raw CLIP motif logos.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quantify homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) from tumor copy number using the three genomic-scar metrics — loss of heterozygosity (LOH), large-scale state transitions (LST), and telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI) — with scarHRD, and via the whole-genome HRDetect and CHORD models. Covers the genomic instability score, the PARP-inhibitor clinical context, whole-genome-doubling correction, and the scar-versus-state distinction. Use when computing an HRD score for PARP-inhibitor eligibility, deriving LOH/LST/TAI scars from allele-specific copy number, deciding between scar-based and mutational-signature HRD methods, or interpreting an HRD result in a BRCA-reverted or low-purity tumor.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Infer orthologous genes and gene families across species using OrthoFinder3 (HOG-based phylogenetic orthology), SonicParanoid2, Broccoli, ProteinOrtho, OMA / FastOMA hierarchical orthologous groups, eggNOG-mapper, JustOrthologs, and TOGA whole-genome-alignment orthology. Use when building single-copy ortholog sets for phylogenomics, classifying co-orthologs and in/out-paralogs after gene duplication, propagating functional annotation via orthology with awareness of the ortholog conjecture, distinguishing speciation from duplication via gene-tree species-tree reconciliation, computing Quest-for-Orthologs benchmark performance, or running synteny-aware ortholog detection in WGD-affected lineages.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs novel molecules using REINVENT 4 (de novo, scaffold decoration, linker design, R-group, molecular optimization), MolMIM, Diffusion-based generators (DiGress, DiffSMol), and JT-VAE with explicit handling of multi-parameter optimization (MPO), goal-directed scoring functions, transfer/reinforcement/curriculum learning, synthetic accessibility scoring, and chemical space exploration vs exploitation. Use when designing new chemical matter against a target, decorating a scaffold, linking fragments, or optimizing a hit for multiple ADMET / activity properties simultaneously.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs PROTACs, molecular glues, and bivalent degraders with explicit handling of E3 ligase choice (VHL, CRBN, IAP, MDM2, KEAP1), linker design (length, composition, rigidity), ternary complex prediction (PRosettaC, DeepTernary, AlphaFold3 with constraints), cooperativity (alpha), DC50 / Dmax characterization, hook effect, and prediction-experiment reconciliation. Use when designing targeted protein degraders, planning linker SAR, predicting ternary complex stability, or building generative degrader workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs retrosynthetic planning using AiZynthFinder (MCTS, template-based), Chemformer (template-free transformer), ASKCOS, and emerging RetroSynFormer with explicit handling of route scoring, building-block availability (eMolecules, Enamine, Mcule), forward prediction validation (Molecular Transformer), and disconnection-aware multi-objective search (MO-MCTS). Use when assessing synthetic feasibility of generated or selected molecules, planning multi-step syntheses, building synthesis-aware design pipelines, or screening libraries for retro-route feasibility.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs covalent inhibitors and warheads targeting cysteine (most common, 98% of covalent drugs), lysine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, and aspartate residues, with explicit handling of warhead reactivity (acrylamide, chloroacetamide, vinyl sulfone, sulfonyl fluoride, fluorosulfate, aldehyde, boronate, nitrile), reversibility (kinact/Ki, t_residence), glutathione (GSH) stability, intrinsic reactivity assays, and covalent docking (DOCKovalent, GOLD, HCovDock). Use when designing covalent inhibitors for targeted covalent inhibition (TCI), KRAS G12C-style approaches, or rationalizing covalent SAR.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Predicts whether a DNA variant alters mRNA splicing using sequence-based deep-learning tools — SpliceAI (10kb context dilated CNN, clinical default), Pangolin (multi-tissue), MMSplice (modular per-region CNN with calibrated ΔPSI), SpliceTransformer/TrASPr (tissue-aware transformers), SpliceVault (empirical 300K-RNA lookup of likely mis-splicing outcomes), CADD-Splice (composite score). Applies the ClinGen SVI 2023 framework for ACMG/AMP variant interpretation (PVS1, PP3, BP4 evidence codes), HGVS splicing nomenclature (c.123+1G>A, c.123-3T>G, r.spl?), extended-window scoring for deep-intronic pseudoexons, tissue-specific predictions, branchpoint variant detection (BPHunter, LaBranchoR), and splice-switching ASO design. Use when interpreting splice impact of clinical variants, prioritizing VUS, identifying deep-intronic pathogenic variants, or designing ASOs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run the advanced iterative workflow — Wayfinding AST discovery, Relentless Grilling, contract and spec design, TDD, council review, and docs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Provides dependency injection patterns for Spring Boot projects, including constructor-first design, optional collaborator handling, bean selection, and wiring validation. Use when creating services and configurations, replacing field injection, or troubleshooting ambiguous or fragile Spring wiring.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when working with domain models, aggregates, value objects, domain events, or repositories in a DDD-style project. Ensures rich domain model over anemic CRUD.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review a feature and enhance it with purposeful animations, micro-interactions, and motion effects that improve usability and delight. Use when the user mentions adding animation, transitions, micro-interactions, motion design, hover effects, or making the UI feel more alive.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Full-stack Convex development guidelines covering React, Vite, TypeScript, mutations, auth, design system, and documentation practices. Use when building features, writing Convex functions, or making code changes in this project.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Amplify safe or boring designs to make them more visually interesting and stimulating. Increases impact while maintaining usability. Use when the user says the design looks bland, generic, too safe, lacks personality, or wants more visual impact and character.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Add strategic color to features that are too monochromatic or lack visual interest, making interfaces more engaging and expressive. Use when the user mentions the design looking gray, dull, lacking warmth, needing more color, or wanting a more vibrant or expressive palette.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.