조사, 논문, 교육, 자격증 공부 (4.2천건)
Apply practical DAG decomposition, transitive-edge reduction, and reachability indexing to dense dependency graphs. Use when low width and repeated queries justify preprocessing. NOT for cyclic graphs, one-off graph checks, or exact-minimum-chain requirements.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured interview and observation techniques for extracting tacit knowledge from domain experts
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adversarial reviewer for The Federated Harbor whitepaper — the third paper in the Curiositech sequence after Anchor and Bonded Commons. Probes federation-specific threats: trust transitivity, cross-harbor token forgery, federated revocation under partition, cross-harbor Sybil, cross-domain settlement, equivocation, bond-pool draining, cold-start joining, federation-operator Sybil. Use during a versioned red-vs-white round; pairs with federated-harbor-whitehat. NOT for incident response, NOT for the Anchor or Bonded papers (use redteam-review).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
An innate exploratory drive that guarantees no graph node remains permanently invisible to an agent population. After a warm-up period (step > 3), each agent fires a coverage scan with probability |unseen_nodes| / |all_nodes|. When triggered, the agent teleports directly to the globally unseen node with the highest belief uncertainty, works it, and returns control to the normal action-selection loop. Probability is self-annealing: it starts near 1.0 when almost everything is unseen and decays toward 0.0 as coverage saturates, requiring no manual schedule. The mechanism is "innate" (hard-coded into the agent step loop) as distinct from the "adaptive" EFE path, which requires local neighbors and learned precision weights. Together they form a two-layer exploration architecture: adaptive for locally-guided foraging, innate for topological completeness.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze hierarchical DAG-like systems by separating undirected substrate from ordering metadata, then classifying diamonds, mixers, shortcuts, and hidden cycle structure. Use for workflow architecture, citation or genealogy DAG comparison, and information-flow diagnosis. NOT for ordinary cycle detection in arbitrary graphs, one-node runtime debugging, or systems with no real ordering constraint.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Learns from DAG execution history to improve future performance. Identifies successful patterns, detects anti-patterns, and provides recommendations. Activate on 'learn patterns', 'execution patterns', 'what worked', 'optimize based on history', 'pattern analysis'. NOT for failure analysis (use dag-failure-analyzer) or performance profiling (use dag-performance-profiler).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze undirected cycle structure within a valid DAG using the source paper's orientation and contraction method. Use for cycle-basis analysis with explicit graph and reduction choices. NOT for directed feedback loops, workflow deadlocks, or runtime resilience claims.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conduct Critical Decision Method (CDM) interviews to elicit expert reasoning strategies (L3 knowledge) from practitioners about specific challenging past incidents. Use when capturing expertise for skill development, preserving knowledge before practitioner departure, building post-incident learning artifacts, or investigating decisions in complex sociotechnical systems. Outputs structured incident reconstructions with cues, decisions, alternatives considered, and counterfactual analysis suitable for distillation into skills or training material.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Revise the Harbor Book so prose, drawings, and marginalia explain the same argument without unpublished development-document dependencies. Use for chapter additions, substantive rewrites, caption editing, visual exposition, and eliminating internal ADR citations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Research AI coding assistant products, audiences, user stories, social proof, hacks, and unmet needs for apps like Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Warp Code, Devin, Windsurf, GitHub Copilot, Cline, Aider, and homegrown agent stacks. Use when designing or positioning agentic developer tools, Port Daddy Agent Harbor, swarm consoles, background coding agents, or competitive/product research for AI software engineering. NOT for implementing the coding agent runtime, generic market research, or UX mockups without developer workflow evidence.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply AlphaGo-style patterns: learned priors plus search, mixed evaluators, self-play, and asynchronous fast/slow loops. Use for intractable search and compute allocation. NOT for basic supervised learning, tractable optimization, or domains without search bottlenecks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Pipeline that turns a big system idea into briefs for an agent fleet. Use when Arman says 'let's plan out X', 'build or overhaul the X system', 'create the vision and plan for X', 'do the full discovery process', 'get this ready for a fleet', or 'do what we did for education', or when carrying forward a VISION, COMPETITIVE_INSIGHTS, roadmap, or briefs doc. NOT for one feature in a live system (use build-sub-feature).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Working playbook preloaded into the researcher helper; the coach updates its Lessons after each round. Use only when acting as researcher or coaching it. NOT for general research tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generates creative, research-backed domain name ideas and checks availability with competitor analysis, pattern recognition, and quality scoring. Use when brainstorming brandable domains for a product or project.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
実行中・実行済みのプログラムやジョブの状況を知りたいとき，自分が起動したものか無関係のものかを問わず調べて答える．「どうなってる？」「学習状況は？」「進捗見せて」など，実行そのものを頼んでいるわけではなく既存の何かの様子を尋ねられたときに使う．新しく実行を頼まれたときは /ops:exec を使う．
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
ユーザーからの修正・指摘を受けた際の学習記録と自己改善ループ。ユーザーから「違う」「そうじゃない」「前にも言ったけど」といった修正を受けた時、同じミスを繰り返していると気づいた時、セッション開始時の教訓確認で使う。修正やフィードバックを受けたら必ずこのスキルを参照する。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
X上の技術知見・障害・運用事例・公式発表を調べる依頼に使う。ログイン済みXのネイティブ検索から一次情報と反証を確認する。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
repositoryを調査し、`docs/PLAN/YYMMDD_{slug}.md` にPhase、Gate、完了状態、実行ルール、チェック項目を持つ自己完結した永続計画を作成または再構成する。Use when the user asks for simple-plan、チェックリスト式の計画、複数停止点を持つ中規模作業、段階的なapp分割やlocal migration、production前Gate、または既存planの構成変更。単発Sprintでは収まらないが、詳細なworker委任計画までは不要な作業向け。既存planをそのまま実行・再開するだけの場合は使わない。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
HeroUI Pro React の新リリースを公式サイトから調査し、 指定されたリリースノートドキュメントを追記更新するスキル。 「できるようになったこと・作れるようになったもの」を主軸に、 自然な日本語でユーザーストーリーとして記述する。 Trigger: HeroUI Pro リリースノート更新, heroui-pro release notes, heroui-pro更新, /dev:heroui-pro-release-notes
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
品質管理、不適合調査、根本原因分析、是正措置、サプライヤー品質管理に関する 体系化された専門知識。規制下の製造環境で15年以上の経験を持つ品質エンジニアの 知見に基づく。FDA、IATF 16949、AS9100環境を網羅。NCRライフサイクル管理、 CAPAシステム、SPC解釈、監査方法論を含む。不適合の調査、根本原因分析、 CAPA管理、SPCデータの解釈、サプライヤー品質課題の対応に使用。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
コーディング前のリサーチワークフロー。カスタムコードを書く前に既存のツール、ライブラリ、パターンを検索する。リサーチャーエージェントを起動。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.