리서치·학습 스킬

Builds an evidence-based landscape for a drug, target, or pathway. It separates disease relevance, druggability, preclinical and clinical evidence, competition, and development maturity to show what is supported and where uncertainty or strategic openings remain.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assessing a target’s evidence in a specific disease
• Comparing target biology with clinical development progress
• Mapping competition and alternative approaches

Compare papers by study type, methods, validation, and how carefully their conclusions match the evidence. The skill explains which papers best support a central claim, provide context or mechanism, or need cautious citation, without ranking by prestige alone.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Choosing which papers should anchor a manuscript claim
• Comparing trials, cohorts, reviews, and mechanism studies
• Assigning papers roles as context or mechanistic support

Read a research paper figure by figure to map each visual to the claim it is meant to support. Separate what is shown from interpretation, judge the strength of the evidence, and flag conclusions that go beyond the available figures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Quickly understand a paper’s main findings from its figures
• Check whether figures support the authors’ central claims
• Reconstruct a paper’s argument in figure order

Map specific gaps in care from guidelines, reviews, and real-world or clinical-practice evidence. It organizes where current care falls short across the patient journey, rates how strongly each need is supported, and helps frame research value without treating general disease burden as proof of an unmet need.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Finding care gaps in a disease area or treatment pathway
• Mapping diagnostic, monitoring, or implementation problems
• Grounding a research proposal in evidence-backed clinical needs

Find biomedical papers through Semantic Scholar, turn papers into structured reading notes, and record insights from follow-up discussions. The accumulated literature can be synthesized into a Research Foundation Document for later protocol design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Finding papers related to a research topic
• Creating structured notes from a paper or abstract
• Recording insights while discussing a paper

Classify a medical or biomedical paper by the study structure its methods describe. The result distinguishes primary and supporting designs in hybrid studies, explains relevant evidence-family placement, and notes confidence and ambiguity for literature appraisal.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Check whether a paper is a cohort or cross-sectional study
• Separate clinical and experimental designs in a hybrid paper
• Prepare a study design label for evidence appraisal

Map biomarkers in a disease area by type, specimen, use case, validation, and maturity. The structured evidence map distinguishes exploratory signals from externally validated or clinically embedded markers, and highlights limitations and gaps without treating popularity as proof of clinical readiness.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Mapping biomarker evidence by disease and intended use
• Comparing validation and maturity across biomarker classes
• Finding under-validated areas in a research field

Explore heredity, Mendelian laws, and inheritance patterns through patient, example-led explanations in Gregor Mendel’s voice. The skill adapts to a learner’s level, connects classical genetics with later discoveries, and marks where evidence or knowledge has limits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Understanding dominant and recessive traits
• Working through a Punnett square
• Learning how inheritance patterns work

Shape an early or overly broad clinical or biomedical idea into a bounded, searchable, and testable research question. Identify missing elements, choose a fitting framework such as PICO or a mechanism-based structure, and suggest the next research step without answering the substantive question.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Narrowing a broad biomedical topic before searching literature
• Framing a clinical idea as a researchable question
• Choosing between PICO and other question frameworks

Maps a biomedical topic into research streams, populations, endpoints, methods, and evidence density. It highlights well-covered and thin areas and suggests possible entry points, while keeping those observations separate from formal research gaps or study plans.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Getting oriented in an unfamiliar biomedical topic
• Mapping evidence before a formal gap analysis
• Structuring a topic before a scoping review

Assess whether a biomedical research area is truly saturated or only busy on the surface. It organizes evidence about repeated study designs, validation depth, and major groups, then maps meaningful entry angles and the timing and feasibility of pursuing them.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking whether a popular disease research topic is still open
• Comparing crowded study designs with less explored research angles
• Assessing whether a research project can be differentiated

Find realistic journal targets for a biomedical manuscript by weighing its topic, study design, evidence strength, and practical constraints. Get tiered candidates, fit analysis, a primary recommendation, and a next step after rejection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Choosing journals for a new manuscript
• Comparing a journal’s scope and method fit
• Finding a next target after rejection

Turn reviewer or editor comments into structured, point-by-point response drafts. The skill classifies each issue as acceptance, explanation, rebuttal, or additional analysis, links replies to actual manuscript changes, and flags unresolved requests or missing revision context.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Drafting point-by-point replies to reviewer comments
• Turning revision notes into a response letter
• Linking replies to manuscript changes and figures

Turn clarified research into a structured plain-language summary for colleagues outside the field. It highlights the study goal, what was studied, key findings, evidence limits, and practical next steps, with wording adapted to clinical, lab, computational, product, or management audiences.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Explain research findings to a mixed-discipline team
• Prepare a non-technical study summary for colleagues
• Clarify what different teams should do with a finding

Turn existing biomedical figures, analyses, and result notes into a clear Results section outline. It orders primary and supporting findings, separates validation from mechanistic support, reduces repetition, and flags missing information or places where citations may be needed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Ordering figures and findings for a manuscript
• Separating primary results from supporting analyses
• Restructuring a fragmented Results section

Review a manuscript before arXiv submission for unverifiable references, leftover AI prompts or comments, placeholders, consistency issues, disclosure concerns, and moderation risks. The skill produces a located fix list and readiness report without judging authorship from writing style or rewriting claims.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking a LaTeX paper before arXiv upload
• Verifying BibTeX references and citation keys
• Scanning for leftover AI prompts or placeholders

Reviews whether manuscript claims are supported by the cited sources. It flags mismatches, overstatements, paraphrase drift, and possible second-hand citations, ranks concerns by severity, and identifies where more source material is needed for a reliable judgment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking citations in an introduction or discussion
• Finding claims that exceed their cited evidence
• Reviewing possible second-hand citations

Review an academic paper, plan revisions, or prepare responses to reviewer comments through staged work cycles. It estimates the workload, reviews contribution, rigor, writing, and editorial fit, then creates a prioritized revision backlog and exports reports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Review a manuscript and prioritize its main issues
• Plan revision work after receiving reviewer comments
• Estimate the effort for a paper revision

Drafts or revises a grant application's Specific Aims page or an NSF Project Summary from a study idea, hypothesis, and supporting evidence. It helps organize the problem, research gap, aims, expected outcomes, and impact into the required opening structure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Draft an NIH R01 Specific Aims page
• Shape a testable hypothesis into grant aims
• Prepare an NSF Project Summary

Check a biomedical manuscript against reporting frameworks such as CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, or TRIPOD. The review identifies missing or weakly reported items, distinguishes major gaps from minor issues, and prioritizes corrections while flagging when more manuscript material is needed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Check a trial paper against CONSORT
• Find missing reporting items before submission
• Review a manuscript for STROBE or PRISMA gaps

Draft or revise the Methods section of a biomedical paper from a study protocol, analysis details, or existing text. It checks coverage against study reporting guidelines, aligns methods with reported results, and can adapt wording to a journal’s structure and word limit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Writing a Methods section from a study protocol
• Revising a biomedical manuscript’s Methods text
• Checking Methods coverage against CONSORT or STROBE

Search official sources, technology media, and community discussions for information on new products and technologies. Cross-check findings, note their dates and sources, and save an organized summary in a knowledge base.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking recent details about a new product
• Comparing information across several source types
• Saving sourced technology research for future use

Run structured web research and save findings to a dated Markdown note as searches progress. The final brief organizes key facts with source links, confidence levels, unresolved questions, and writing suggestions for later work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Researching background for an article
• Tracking findings across several web searches
• Preparing a sourced brief for later writing

Research recent discussion across major Chinese platforms, rank findings by engagement, and group related posts into cross-platform topics. The skill can also show current hot-search lists and produce cited Markdown, JSON, or HTML reports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Researching recent Chinese user opinions about a product
• Finding trends discussed across Chinese social platforms
• Viewing today's cross-platform hot-search topics