리서치·학습 스킬

Run a fast 2-agent pre-submission check for an economics paper — focuses on contribution, identification, and causal overclaiming. Completes in ~1 minute.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review research code for reproducibility and quality, extract the paper's main empirical claims, compare paper to code, and write a constructive markdown report. Designed for social science / economics projects with LaTeX papers and Stata, R, or Python code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run an 8-agent pre-submission referee report for an academic paper targeting a specified journal

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a fast 3-agent mechanical check of an economics paper — spelling and grammar, internal consistency and cross-references, and unsupported claims. Reports fixable errors, not editorial judgment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Convert a LaTeX research paper into a policy brief, 1-page summary, or 5-page summary for a general audience, with factual review and a standalone HTML page for GitHub Pages.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Persistent file-based planning for multi-step AI-agent work. Keeps task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md on disk; lifecycle hooks inject selected project planning context. Automatic recovery reads project planning files only. Explicit session-catchup.py --metadata reads same-project local agent session records and emits aggregate counts only; --replay may emit bounded nonce-framed excerpts. Optional gated mode can request continuation only when the host supports it and never runs commands declared in Markdown. The skill has no network upload path. Use for research or work needing 5+ tool calls.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use Exa MCP for current web, code/docs, company, people, and page-fetch research. Prefer current hosted tool schemas and note deprecated tools.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Professional deep research report generation — multi-agent collaboration with parallel chapter writing, automatic latest-data targeting, multilingual output, and built-in quality checks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Autonomous iteration loop: modify, verify, keep/discard against any metric

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structured requirements elicitation for analysis requests. Use when scoping new analysis projects, clarifying ambiguous business questions, or documenting analysis acceptance criteria with stakeholders.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conduct comprehensive AI-powered research with citations via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants deep research, a detailed report, a comparison, market analysis, literature review, or says "research", "investigate", "analyze in depth", "compare X vs Y", "what does the market look like for", or needs multi-source synthesis with explicit citations. Returns a structured report grounded in web sources. Takes 30-120 seconds. For quick fact-finding, use tavily-search instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Programmatic Tavily search with context isolation. Use when web search or extraction will return large results that need filtering, deduplication, or multi-step triage before they enter the model context. Use tavily-search for ordinary lookups and tavily-research for end-to-end cited synthesis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automate source-grounded research with Google NotebookLM. Create notebooks from URLs, text, or local files; ask cited questions; run fast or deep web research; create articles and social drafts; and generate or download audio, video, cinematic video, slides, reports, study guides, quizzes, flashcards, mind maps, infographics, and data tables. Use when a user asks for NotebookLM, cited source analysis, research-to-content workflows, podcasts, slides, study material, artifact generation, RSS digests, or trend research.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Launch and continue the Volcengine AI Research survey workflow for concept testing, audience design, questionnaire drafting, interview guide generation, execution confirmation, progress checks, and result queries. Use this skill when the user wants to create, revise, confirm, execute, or follow up on a real AI research survey task in ABCompass instead of doing generic brainstorming, copywriting, translation, summarization, or broad market discussion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when user asks for a sequenced learning path within a Buddhist tradition — 学修次第, 先学什么, 从哪入门, 下一步读什么, curriculum, 学习计划, 路径推荐. Differs from /compare-masters (parallel opinion) and /master-debate (adversarial dialectic) by being 纵向 / 时序: stage-by-stage plan keyed on tradition × level (L0-L3) → foundation → intermediate → advanced + blind spots. Trigger is planning intent — "禅宗对比" goes to /compare-masters; "禅宗从哪开始学" goes here.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when user asks about 印光大师, 净土, 念佛, 持名念佛, 十念法, 摄耳谛听, 老实念佛, 信愿行, 带业往生, 仗佛慈力, 自力他力, 竖出横超, 往生, 极乐, 阿弥陀佛, 净土三经, 敦伦尽分, 闲邪存诚, 因果报应, 文钞, 一函遍复, or wants teaching in 印光大师 Yinguang's voice. Triggers include "印光"、"文钞"、"老实念佛"、"信愿行"、"带业往生"、"仗佛慈力"、"横超竖出"、"都摄六根"、"净念相继"、"敦伦尽分"、"闲邪存诚"、"因果"、"十念法"、"摄耳谛听"、"一函遍复"、"净土三经"、"往生" — invoke whenever user's question touches Pure Land practice, Amitabha recitation, or faith-vow-practice, even without explicit request.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a grounded recommendation-system study plan, explain a topic for a graduate student or new engineer, and track local progress. Use for learning, revision, interview preparation, and deciding what to study next.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Post-process LaTeX project prose to improve readability through varied sentence and paragraph lengths. Removes filler phrases and unnecessary transitions while preserving all citations and semantic meaning. Use after drafting is complete, when sections read as monotonous or blocky.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Write LaTeX ML/AI review articles for arXiv using the IEEEtran template and verified BibTeX citations. Use when writing, planning, or continuing an arXiv review/survey paper, or when validating and repairing citations in an existing LaTeX project.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

How TestDriver learns your app and caches what it discovers for instant, deterministic replays

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill should be used when performing web research beyond a simple single search -- looking into topics, comparing options, investigating questions, finding recommendations, or any task where effective use of Exa, Firecrawl, and Reddit tools matters. Triggers on "research", "look into", "investigate", "compare", "find out about", "search for", "find information", "what do people think about", "what are the best", "look up", or multi-source search tasks. Also invocable explicitly by deep-research team members via the Skill tool.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill should be used when the user asks for "deep research", "research team", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "investigate thoroughly", "compare X vs Y in depth", or needs synthesis across multiple sources with verification. It spawns a coordinated team of researcher agents across multiple rounds, with the lead triaging findings and creating targeted follow-up tasks. Scales from Focused (2 researchers, 1-2 rounds) to Comprehensive (4 researchers, 3-4 rounds with cross-verification). Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Complete App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching, optimizing, and tracking mobile app performance on Apple App Store and Google Play Store

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.