oma-scm
무료Manage Git branches, merges, conflicts, commits, and release baselines. Use for repository history and change-management operations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
소설, 시나리오, 블로그, 퇴고, 교정 (1.8천건)
Manage Git branches, merges, conflicts, commits, and release baselines. Use for repository history and change-management operations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create and edit React Native Storybook stories using Component Story Format (CSF). Use when writing .stories.tsx files, adding stories to React Native components, configuring Storybook addons (controls, actions, backgrounds, notes), setting up argTypes, decorators, parameters, or working with portable stories for testing. Applies to any task involving @storybook/react-native story authoring.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Set up Storybook for React Native in Expo, React Native CLI, or Re.Pack projects. Use when adding Storybook to a project, configuring metro.config.js with withStorybook, creating .rnstorybook configuration files, setting up Storybook routes in Expo Router, configuring getStorybookUI, or adding the StorybookPlugin to a Re.Pack rspack/webpack config. Covers Expo, Expo Router, plain React Native CLI, and Re.Pack setups.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Incrementally upgrade React Native Storybook across the supported migration paths. Use when upgrading `@storybook/react-native` projects from 5.3.x to 6.5.x, 6.5.x to 7.6.x, 7.6.x to 8.3.x, 8.x to 9.x, or 9.x to 10.x. Detect the currently installed Storybook version, choose only the next migration step, update dependencies and config, regenerate `storybook.requires`, convert remaining `storiesOf` stories to CSF during the `6.5.x -> 7.6.x` upgrade, and stop after a single version hop instead of jumping multiple major versions at once.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create user stories with duplicate checking across any project tracker (Linear, GitHub Issues, Jira)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Source authentic, high-res PUBLIC-DOMAIN artwork from museum open-access APIs (Met, Cleveland, SMK, Rijksmuseum, NGA, Art Institute of Chicago, Getty, Smithsonian) instead of AI-generated or generic-stock imagery. The default move whenever a visual needs an aesthetic, credible image (blog heroes, decks, social cards, essay/spec figures). Verified keyless recipes + licensing rules inside.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate meaning-carrying editorial data-illustrations in the monotykamary / Linear aesthetic (near-black grayscale, Inter display + mono labels, hairline framed figures) with a single coral accent. This is a GENERATIVE GUIDE, not a template gallery: it teaches the "claim -> geometry" method so any session can invent the RIGHT figure for what a post actually argues, then render it as a self-contained, theme-aware, reduced-motion-safe HTML/SVG figure. Use when writing/illustrating a blog post, essay, spec, or slide and you want a chart, diagram, or illustration that carries a thesis (not decoration) in the house style. Triggers: "make a chart/diagram/illustration for this", "visualize this argument", "monotykamary/Linear style figure", "editorial graphic".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
X/Twitter运营:选题、推文与长文、账号诊断、增长和转化。用户说X运营、推特、写推文、涨粉、tweet、thread、发推时使用。以本人数据和真实经历校正通用经验。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
INVOKE THIS SKILL when your LangGraph needs to persist state, remember conversations, travel through history, or configure subgraph checkpointer scoping. Covers checkpointers, thread_id, time travel, Store, and subgraph persistence modes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when deciding whether an anthropology project fits American Anthropologist (AA) and which section to target. AA is the four-field AAA flagship, so the test is significance across anthropology (sociocultural, archaeology, biological, linguistic), not single-subfield novelty. Helps frame the question and pick a section; it does not collect data or conduct fieldwork.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when targeting Geology (GSA) or deciding whether a short, high-impact geoscience research letter fits this venue. Encodes the journal's broad-significance-in-tight-length fit, the novelty and rapid-communication bar, GSA house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use for full-manuscript prose and narrative craft on an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — voice, structure, and the storytelling ASQ is known for. Polishes the writing; it does not change the theory or analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you need to understand the Academy of Management Review (AMR) developmental, multi-round review and interpret a decision letter focused on theoretical novelty and logical soundness. Explains the process and decision types; it does NOT draft the response document (that is amr-rebuttal).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when building the novel integrative framework that an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review must deliver — the theory-advancing "new way of seeing the field" that is the acceptance bar, not a catalog of papers. Designs the spine; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or appraise evidence balance (amann-evidence-standards).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when revising an AAAI manuscript for broad-AI-audience fit, a first-page contribution statement legible to non-specialist Phase-1 reviewers, two-column readability, concise novelty claims, reproducibility-checklist alignment, hedged limitations and ethics, and policy-aware framing of AI-system and capability claims.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generates an x-ray.md pre-audit report covering overview, enhanced threat model (protocol-type profiling, git-weighted attack surfaces, temporal risk analysis, composability dependency mapping), invariants, integrations, docs quality, test analysis, and developer/git history. Triggers on 'x-ray', 'audit readiness', 'readiness report', 'pre-audit report', 'prep this protocol', 'protocol prep', 'summarize this protocol'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review generated or changed documentation before it ships — READMEs, API references, docstrings, PHPDoc/JSDoc, changelogs, tutorials, and doc sites. Best used reactively after an agent writes or edits docs, after code changes documented behavior, or before publishing docs. Use when the user says 'review the docs', 'is this documentation accurate', 'update the docs', 'write a README', 'document this API', 'add a docstring', or 'add a changelog entry'. Core job: verify every referenced function, flag, endpoint, config key, and code sample against the source; catch docs-vs-code drift; strip filler and unverifiable claims. DO NOT USE for production code review (use clean-code-guard), test review (use test-guard), marketing copy or blog posts, prose style editing of non-technical writing, or documentation site theming.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Reduce defensive writing in drafts and revisions by removing unnecessary caveats, disclaimers, hedges, apology-like framing, negative self-limiting statements, and over-explanations while preserving necessary scope, accuracy, safety, legal, ethical, and methodological limits. Use when drafting or revising academic writing, papers, essays, abstracts, introductions, contribution statements, discussions, conclusions, technical explanations, grant writing, product writing, policy writing, professional reports, or any text the user wants to be clearer, stronger, more direct, more concise, more confident, less verbose, less caveated, less apologetic, or less defensive.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Map complete topic clusters for any subject area — hub pages, spoke articles, supporting content, internal linking architecture. Identifies content gaps, priority order, and builds a structured content calendar. Produces topic maps that build genuine topical authority, not random blog posts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
End-to-end leadership change signal composite. Takes any set of companies, detects recent leadership changes (new VP+, C-suite hires and promotions), evaluates relevance to your product, and drafts personalized outreach. Uses Apollo People Search (free) for fast detection + Apollo Enrichment (1 credit/person) for employment history, start dates, LinkedIn URLs, and verified emails.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Scrape blog posts via RSS feeds (free, no API key) with Apify fallback for JS-heavy sites. Use when you need to monitor competitor blogs, track industry content, or aggregate blog posts by keyword.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
End-to-end news-triggered signal composite. Takes any piece of news — an article, LinkedIn post, tweet, announcement, event, trend, regulation, product launch, acquisition, layoff, expansion, or any other public event — and evaluates whether the companies or people mentioned are ICP fits. If yes, identifies the connection between the news and your product, finds the right people to contact, and drafts personalized outreach using the news as the hook. Tool-agnostic. Accepts both company-level and person-level news triggers. AUTO-TRIGGER: Load this composite whenever a user shares a URL (LinkedIn post, article, tweet, blog post) or mentions a company/person they "came across", "saw", or "found" from any external source and asks about relevance, fit, ICP match, or whether to reach out. The user does NOT need to explicitly say "outreach" — any signal evaluation request from an external source triggers this.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluate YC batch companies for investment — scrapes the YC directory, researches each company and its founders (work history, LinkedIn, website), assesses founder-company fit, and exports to Google Sheets with priority rankings. Use when asked to evaluate YC companies, research a YC batch, screen startups, or do due diligence on YC companies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.