ArabelaTso

Reorganizes markdown documents into well-structured, consistent format while preserving content and improving readability. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Fix heading hierarchy issues (skipped levels, multiple h1s), (2) Generate or update table of contents, (3) Standardize formatting (lists, code blocks, emphasis, links), (4) Improve grammar and spelling, (5) Add missing standard sections (installation, usage, etc.), (6) Remove redundant or duplicate content, (7) Restructure technical docs, READMEs, or long-form content for better organization and flow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automatically identify metamorphic properties (symmetry, linearity, additivity, input invariances) from programs or functions. Use when generating metamorphic tests, discovering program properties, validating transformations, or creating test oracles without explicit specifications. Analyzes control flow, data flow, and sample executions to output structured properties for metamorphic test generation and verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate test cases using metamorphic testing by applying transformations based on metamorphic properties. Use when you need to expand test suites, test programs without oracles, validate mathematical or algorithmic properties, or detect subtle bugs through input-output relationships. The skill takes a program, original test cases, and metamorphic properties as input, generates new test cases by applying transformations, executes tests, verifies outputs satisfy properties, reports violations and anomalies, and outputs an expanded test suite with property coverage summary. Supports multiple programming languages and property types.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automatically repair code violations of temporal properties using model-checking counterexamples as guidance. Use when working with formal verification results, temporal logic property violations (LTL, CTL), model checking counterexamples, or when asked to repair property violations, fix counterexamples, repair temporal properties, fix model checking violations, or repair code based on counterexamples. Applicable to concurrent systems, state machines, synchronization issues, safety/liveness properties, and resource management violations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Enforces strict modular code architecture: SRP, no monolithic index files, no catch-all utils, 200 LOC hard limit. This rule is NON-NEGOTIABLE. Violations BLOCK all further work until resolved.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates complete modules and components from interface contracts and specifications. Use when Claude needs to build larger software components, implement interfaces, create service layers, or generate complete modules with multiple related classes. Supports Python (with type hints and protocols) and Java (with interfaces and abstract classes). Trigger when users request "implement this interface", "generate a module for", "create a service layer", "build a component that implements", or provide interface definitions that need implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Translate source code between programming languages at function, class, and module levels while preserving behavior and generating verification tests. Use when translating code from one language to another (e.g., "translate this Python module to JavaScript", "convert this Java class to C#", "port this code to Go and generate tests"), migrating codebases between languages, or creating equivalent implementations across different technology stacks. Handles idiom adaptation, standard library mappings, and test generation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Compare behavior across multiple versions of programs or repositories. Use when you need to analyze how functionality changes between versions, identify regressions, compare outputs and exceptions, or validate upgrades. The skill compares execution behavior, test results, outputs, exceptions, and observable states across versions, generating detailed reports showing behavioral divergences, potential regressions, added/removed functionality, and areas requiring validation. Supports multiple programming languages and can work with test suites or execution traces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Dead code removal via parallel scanning, reference verification, batch execution, and atomic commits. You are the ORCHESTRATOR — you scan, verify, batch, then delegate ALL removals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Recommends appropriate software design patterns based on problem descriptions, requirements, or code scenarios. Use when designing software architecture, refactoring code, solving common design problems, or choosing between design approaches. Analyzes the problem context and suggests suitable creational, structural, behavioral, architectural, or concurrency patterns with implementation guidance and trade-off analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Optimize test suites using mutation testing to maximize mutation kill rate with minimal tests. Use when you need to reduce test suite size while maintaining quality, identify redundant tests, improve mutation coverage, or validate test effectiveness. The skill analyzes test coverage, execution intervals, and redundancy using mutation operators, selects or generates a minimal subset of tests that maximizes mutation kill rate, and outputs an optimized test suite with detailed reports showing killed and surviving mutants. Supports multiple programming languages and mutation testing frameworks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designer-turned-developer who crafts stunning UI/UX even without design mockups. Use for any frontend implementation requiring visual design decisions, aesthetic direction, or pixel-perfect UI work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Update Java test classes and methods to work with new code versions after refactoring or modifications. Use when code changes break existing tests due to signature changes, refactoring, or behavior modifications. Takes old and new code versions plus old tests as input, and outputs updated tests that compile and pass against the new code. Handles method signature changes, class refactoring, assertion updates, and mock modifications.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extract abstract mathematical models from imperative code (C, C++, Python, Java, etc.) suitable for formal reasoning in Coq. Use when the user asks to model imperative code in Coq, create Coq specifications from imperative programs, extract mathematical models for verification, or translate imperative algorithms to Coq for formal reasoning and proof.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate unit tests with proper mocking for Python (unittest.mock/pytest) or Java (Mockito/JUnit) code. Use when users request test generation, unit tests with mocks, or testing code that has external dependencies like database calls, API requests, file I/O, or network operations. Automatically identifies dependencies to mock and creates executable, maintainable test code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze failed or stuck proofs and propose auxiliary lemmas to help complete the proof in Isabelle/HOL or Coq. Use when encountering proof failures, stuck proof states, unprovable subgoals, or when needing to strengthen induction hypotheses. Identifies missing lemmas, suggests proof strategies, and generates helper lemmas with appropriate statements and proof sketches. Supports inductive proofs, case analysis, rewriting, and complex proof obligations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate complete, production-ready functions and classes from formal specifications, design descriptions, type signatures, or natural language requirements. Use this skill when implementing APIs from specifications, creating data structures from schemas, building classes from UML diagrams, generating code from contracts, or translating design documents into code. Supports multiple programming languages and follows language-specific best practices.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Explain why counterexamples violate specifications by analyzing formal specifications (temporal logic, invariants, pre/postconditions, code contracts), informal requirements (user stories, acceptance criteria), test specifications (assertions, property-based tests), and providing step-by-step traces showing state changes, comparing expected vs actual behavior, identifying root causes, and assessing violation impact. Use when debugging test failures, understanding model checker output, explaining runtime assertion violations, analyzing static analysis warnings, or teaching specification concepts. Produces structured markdown explanations with traces, comparisons, state diagrams, and cause chains. Triggers when users ask why something failed, explain a violation, understand a counterexample, debug a specification, or analyze why a test fails.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Applies abstract interpretation using different abstract domains (intervals, octagons, polyhedra, sign, congruence) to statically analyze program variables and infer invariants, value ranges, and relationships. Use when analyzing program properties, inferring loop invariants, detecting potential errors, or understanding variable relationships through static analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs abstract interpretation over source code to infer possible program states, variable ranges, and data properties without executing the program. Reports potential runtime errors including out-of-bounds accesses, null dereferences, type inconsistencies, division by zero, and integer overflows. Use when analyzing code for potential runtime errors, performing static analysis, checking safety properties, or verifying program behavior without execution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Uses abstract interpretation to automatically infer loop invariants, function preconditions, and postconditions for formal verification. Generates invariants that capture program behavior and support correctness proofs in Dafny, Isabelle, Coq, and other verification systems. Use when adding formal specifications to code, generating verification conditions, inferring contracts for functions, or discovering loop invariants for proofs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identify and report code smells indicating poor design or maintainability issues in Python code, including duplicate code, magic numbers, hardcoded values, God classes, feature envy, inappropriate intimacy, data clumps, primitive obsession, and long parameter lists. Use when conducting code quality audits, preparing for refactoring, improving codebase maintainability, or performing design reviews. Produces markdown reports with severity ratings, locations, descriptions, and specific refactoring recommendations with before/after examples. Triggers when users ask to find code smells, identify design issues, suggest refactorings, improve code quality, or detect maintainability problems.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate concrete counterexamples when formal verification, assertions, or specifications fail. Use this skill when debugging failed proofs, understanding why verification fails, creating minimal reproducing examples, analyzing assertion violations, investigating invariant breaks, or diagnosing specification mismatches. Produces concrete input values, execution traces, and state information that demonstrate the failure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automatically generates executable test cases from model checking counterexample traces. Translates abstract counterexample states and transitions into concrete test inputs, execution steps, and assertions that reproduce property violations. Use when working with model checker outputs (SPIN, CBMC, NuSMV, TLA+, Java PathFinder, etc.) and needing to create regression tests, validate bug fixes, or reproduce verification failures in executable test suites.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.