Build a backend service or an end-to-end frontend/backend integration when service/API/data boundaries are the primary deliverable; do not trigger for pure UI, contract design only, security review, test workflow, or every feature touching both folders.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Perform direct, bounded browser inspection through the `browser.qa` capability when the user requests runtime UI evidence or one browser-specific claim needs DOM/accessibility/console/network/visual verification; do not trigger for every UI change, backend work, delegated QA, or durable E2E artifact routing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI regression scouting routing. Use when agents, prompts, skills, model/tool routing, harness fixtures, or generated-output expectations change and need regression scenarios; do not use for ordinary product-code regressions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build rich marketing/media frontend experiences with cinematic motion, AI assets, copy, and generative art.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run the AILI delivery lifecycle from natural-language IDEATE, DEFINE, BUILD, and SHIP intent or the equivalent slash shortcuts; use for idea shaping, spec/test definition, bounded BUILD package queues, review-repair closeout, or adapter routing without exposing internal stage commands.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Android native Kotlin/Compose app development, Material 3 UI, accessibility, and Gradle builds.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating REST or GraphQL endpoints, defining type contracts between modules, or establishing boundaries between frontend and backend.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Route an explicitly requested independent/delegated browser QA assignment or durable E2E evidence need; do not trigger for direct Playwright/DOM/console/network inspection, ordinary UI implementation, backend-only work, or production-mutating flows.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Repair one concrete reproducible build, typecheck, lint, test, packaging, or CI failure with a bounded root-cause-first loop; do not trigger for runtime bugs without a failing gate, broad test strategy, dependency/toolchain migration, or generic implementation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design, critique, or specify honest charts and data visualizations from known data and audience needs. Use for chart selection, misleading-chart audits, accessibility, dashboard visuals, or "make this data easier to understand"; do not use for raw data analysis, PPT deck generation, spreadsheet surgery, or fabricated chart data.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Configure or modify concrete CI/CD pipelines, jobs, quality gates, test runners, or deployment automation; do not trigger merely because an existing CI gate failed or ordinary source code needs repair.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conduct one bounded evidence-grounded code review when the user explicitly requests review or ROSE names a concrete unresolved correctness/quality risk; do not trigger automatically after implementation, before every merge, for every bug fix/refactor, or as a completion gate.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Code-review quality gate and test-enhancement rubric. Use when ROSE needs sharper review output contracts, severity and risk prioritization, evidence anchors, negative review cases, fixture or golden-output drift guidance, or a Chinese review report profile; do not use as a duplicate code-review agent or final PASS authority.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Simplify a bounded code area when the user explicitly requests behavior-preserving refactoring or a named complexity/readability problem is the accepted task; do not trigger automatically after implementation, during every review, for adjacent cleanup, or when behavior may change.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structure source-grounded consulting-style analysis for strategy, market, product, operations, or decision memos. Use for MECE problem framing, hypotheses, options, tradeoffs, executive recommendations, or "consulting analysis" requests; do not use for legal/financial advice, implementation, data computation, chart rendering, or unsourced business claims.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review a single academic paper, preprint, DOI, arXiv link, or user-provided PDF/text with source-grounded critique. Use for paper summaries, methodology review, novelty checks, reproducibility concerns, or "review this paper" requests; do not use for multi-paper surveys, systematic literature reviews, citation management, or implementation from a paper.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Coverage review and verification sufficiency routing. Use when test coverage, uncovered paths, coverage reports, or verification adequacy need a read-only QA review; do not use for writing tests or running browser/E2E artifacts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze source data, tables, CSV/XLSX extracts, metrics, or experiment results with explicit data-authenticity checks. Use for profiling, cleaning assumptions, statistical summaries, segmentation, trend analysis, or "analyze this data"; do not use for spreadsheet file surgery, chart design only, database migrations, or claims without data provenance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs read-only GitHub issue or PR triage with evidence links. Use when analyzing public or repository GitHub issues/PRs without mutating labels, comments, branches, reviews, merges, or issue state.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Research one bounded mature-project/prior-art question when the user explicitly asks how established projects handle it or ROSE names a decision-shaping prior-art gap; do not trigger automatically for IDEATE, DEFINE, BUILD, implementation, local review, or every design choice.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create, edit, fill, or template-format editable Word/DOCX documents with managed OfficeCLI first and OpenXML fallback for complex or preservation-sensitive work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prefer a fresh matching specialist for a clear bounded non-trivial package when current capabilities and permissions permit it; use direct ROSE work only for accepted direct-work exceptions or a concrete block.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Optimize a measured performance problem when the user names a latency/load/Core Web Vitals/resource target or current profiling evidence identifies a bottleneck; do not trigger from generic implementation, review, or an unsupported suspicion that code may be slow.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Break a clear scope or accepted specification into ordered tasks/packages when the user explicitly asks for a plan, estimate, dependency order, or task breakdown; do not trigger for ordinary implementation, every multi-step task, speculative parallelism, review, or completion.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.