AIPOCH

Use when performing GO and KEGG enrichment on a gene list from bulk RNA-seq or microarray studies, then generating a combined GO/KEGG dot chart. NOT for single-cell RNA-seq, methylation data, or non-expression data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Checks whether manuscript references are accurately matched to claims, appropriately scoped, and not overextended, misquoted, or second-hand cited.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run immune pathway GSVA or ssGSEA analysis from a bulk expression matrix, a sample group file, and a local immune Reactome gene-set table, then export differential pathway results and a heatmap for two-group comparison.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when normalizing bulk gene or protein expression matrices with log2 transform, z-score standardization, or min-max scaling before downstream visualization or exploratory analysis. NOT for count-model normalization such as TPM/DESeq2 size factors, batch correction, or single-cell preprocessing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when validating an existing prognostic risk signature on an external bulk expression cohort with survival outcomes, producing risk scores, Kaplan-Meier curves, risk distribution plots, heatmap, and time-dependent ROC curves. NOT for: model training, feature selection, nomogram construction, calibration analysis, or single-cell data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill to compute ESTIMATE immune-related microenvironment scores from a bulk expression matrix, generate an ESTIMATE score heatmap, and optionally generate group-wise ESTIMATE score boxplots plus significance tables when a sample group file is supplied. Trigger keywords: ESTIMATE, immune score, stromal score, tumor microenvironment score. NOT for: immune cell deconvolution, single-cell analysis, differential expression, clinical diagnosis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when selecting predictive genes or other molecular features from bulk expression matrices for binary case-vs-control classification with elastic net logistic regression, including coefficient path and cross-validation plots. Trigger keywords: elastic net, glmnet, feature selection, binary classification, lambda.min, lambda.1se. NOT for: survival/Cox modeling, multiclass outcomes, single-cell data, or non-expression tables.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Scrum-inspired paper review, revision, and R&R workflow. Handles docx/tex/md/PDF in English or Chinese. Auto-detects manuscript stage, estimates sprint count, runs multi-lens review (Contribution/Rigor/Writing/Editor), generates prioritized revision backlog, exports MD/DOCX/PDF/HTML reports. Use when asked to review a paper, revise based on reviewer comments, handle R&R, respond to peer review, plan paper revision sprints, or when user types /ps or /papersprint.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Drafts journal-ready cover letters for manuscript submission. Use when preparing a submission package, communicating the manuscript's contributions and journal fit to editors, or tailoring the novelty framing for a specific journal's scope. Also triggers on "write a cover letter for my paper", "draft a submission cover letter", "help me write to the editor", or "cover letter for [journal name]".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structures research progress into focused and actionable slides for lab meetings or project reviews without inventing missing content.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Writes the full Introduction section of a biomedical manuscript based on an approved or sufficiently clear study logic, while preserving evidence boundaries and introduction discipline.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a submission-readiness preflight on a manuscript before arXiv upload. Use when the user is preparing an arXiv submission, asks to check a paper before uploading, mentions hallucinated or fake references, leftover LLM meta-comments / prompts in text, placeholder data (TODO, TBD, XX%), AI-use disclosure, scholarly integrity, research integrity, or arXiv moderation risk — even if they don't say "preflight". Also trigger on phrases like "check my paper before arXiv", "verify my references", "scan for AI artifacts", "scan for LLM residue", "is my submission ready", or "review .tex/.bib before submit".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when analyzing bulk RNA-seq or microarray expression data to identify differentially expressed genes between two biological groups (case vs control), with volcano plots and heatmap visualization. NOT for:single-cell RNA-seq, methylation analysis, non-expression data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Improves medical English precision without changing the underlying facts, evidence boundaries, or intended scientific meaning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Converts a biomedical study storyline into a graphical abstract and, when direct image capability is available, generates the graphical abstract directly; otherwise it falls back to prompts, Mermaid flowcharts, or designer-facing briefs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds prioritized manuscript revision plans for major or minor revisions by separating comments that require experiments, analyses, clarification, restructuring, or wording changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when screening differentially expressed genes from a bulk expression matrix between two user-specified groups, producing DEG tables, a volcano plot, and a clustered heatmap. Triggers include DEG analysis, volcano plot, clustered heatmap, limma-based two-group comparison, and case-vs-control screening. NOT for single-cell RNA-seq, multi-group contrasts, count-model workflows such as DESeq2/edgeR, or non-expression omics data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when evaluating the clinical utility of a binary prediction model from a single clinical CSV file by fitting a logistic decision-curve model, plotting decision and clinical-impact curves, and exporting summary outputs. NOT for: survival calibration, ROC-only discrimination analysis, nomogram construction, or time-to-event outcomes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Writes the full Results section of a biomedical manuscript from a sufficiently clear result structure, figure inventory, or analysis summary while preserving evidence boundaries and result hierarchy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when identifying stable sample subtypes from bulk expression matrices with ConsensusClusterPlus, including PAC-based model selection and consensus matrix/CDF visualization. NOT for: differential expression analysis, single-cell clustering workflows, or non-expression tables.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reorganizes a paper into a storyline suitable for scientific posters. Use when planning the section structure, title hierarchy, figure selection, and live-explanation flow for an academic conference poster. Also triggers on "help me design a poster layout", "what sections should my poster have", "how do I arrange my poster", "poster structure for [conference]", or "which figures should I use for my poster".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turns your protocol and analysis workflow into publication-ready Methods text. Use when writing or revising the Methods section of a biomedical manuscript, ensuring it complies with reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, TRIPOD), matches what is in the Results section, and satisfies journal-specific word limits and declarations. Also triggers on "write my methods", "revise my methods section", "how to report my statistics", "what do I need to include in methods for [study type]", or "make my methods CONSORT-compliant".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Acknowledges limitations in sample, design, measurement, and validation in a professional way that improves credibility without undermining the whole paper. Use when writing the limitations paragraph of a Discussion section, preparing a grant risk assessment, responding to reviewers about study weaknesses, or framing scope boundaries for a paper. Also triggers on "write my limitations", "how should I address the limitation of", "reviewer said my sample is too small", or "help me word this limitation".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Rewrites technical research content into a structured lay summary that cross-disciplinary teams can quickly understand and act on. Use when the user wants to explain research to colleagues outside their specialty — clinicians, wet-lab scientists, bioinformaticians, product managers, or leadership. Trigger on: "lay summary", "explain my research to the team", "non-technical summary", "cross-disciplinary summary", "translate my findings", "align our team on the study", or any request to communicate research goals, findings, or next steps to a mixed or non-specialist audience. Part of the AIPOCH Academic Writing skill hub. Sits midstream: after research content is clarified, before downstream deliverables like slide decks or graphical abstracts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.