Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for American Anthropologist (AA) via the Research Exchange platform — section selection, anonymization, word/abstract caps, Chicago author-date (free-format accepted), DOIs, ORCID, ethics statement, and figure permissions/alt text. Final checks; it does not draft content.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when executing and reporting the analysis/interpretation for an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript so it survives expert anonymous review — disciplined ethnographic/qualitative inference, honest interpretation, and (for biological/archaeological work) sound quantitative analysis. Guides analysis and interpretation norms; it does not fabricate evidence or quotations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when explaining or planning around AISTATS peer review, OpenReview review release, author-reviewer discussion, reviewer volunteer expectations, reviewer confidentiality, decision criteria, meta-review dynamics, the statistician-heavy reviewer pool, and PMLR proceedings outcomes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when targeting the Journal of Cleaner Production or deciding whether a cleaner-production/sustainability manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the cleaner-production contribution and methodological-transparency bar, LCA/system-boundary expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when building exhibits for an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript — photographs, maps, site plans, artifact images, kinship diagrams, transcripts, evidence tables, and multimodal media — so they are self-contained, accessible (alt text), ethically cleared (consent, permissions), and count toward the word budget. Designs exhibits; it does not run analysis or clear permissions for you.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when building the conceptual/theoretical argument of an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript into a four-field contribution — whether the work is ethnographic, archaeological, biological, or linguistic. AA rewards a portable concept and reflexive argument over a bare finding or thick description alone. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses or write fieldnotes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when targeting Geology (GSA) or deciding whether a short, high-impact geoscience research letter fits this venue. Encodes the journal's broad-significance-in-tight-length fit, the novelty and rapid-communication bar, GSA house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when targeting Soil Biology & Biochemistry or deciding whether a soil-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the soil-process-mechanism bar, evidence and data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when targeting Trends in Food Science & Technology or deciding whether a food-science review manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's review-only fit, the critical-synthesis and comprehensiveness bar, structure expectations, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when drafting or polishing an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript so it reads across all four fields, follows AA house style (Chicago author-date; free-format submission accepted), fits the section word caps (Research Articles ≤ 8,000 words; abstract 200 words), and uses inclusive, care-ful language. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when positioning an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript in the literature. AERJ readers span the whole field, so the paper must engage the literatures a general education-research audience expects and speak past its own subfield. Builds the positioning argument; it does not write the literature review for you.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when targeting Environment International or deciding whether an environmental-exposure/health manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the population-relevant exposure-health evidence bar, exposome/contaminant expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when designing or auditing AISTATS experiments, simulations, baselines, statistical tests, uncertainty estimates, ablations, random seeds, hyperparameters, compute, dataset handling, and claim-to-evidence fit, with emphasis on experiments that validate theorems rather than chase leaderboards.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when targeting the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (BAMS) or deciding whether a broad-interest atmospheric/oceanic/hydrologic-sciences contribution fits this venue. Encodes the journal's review-and-community positioning, the broad-audience-significance bar, synthesis and field-campaign expectations, AMS house style, official-submission re-check, and misfit heuristics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when targeting Agronomy for Sustainable Development or deciding whether an agronomy / farming-systems manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the explicit-and-evidenced sustainability-contribution bar, evidence and data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when deciding which aejmac-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when targeting Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment or deciding whether an agroecosystem-environment manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the field-to-landscape environmental-outcome bar, data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use as the entry point for any Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript. Routes to the right AgSy sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which article type (research paper, short communication, perspective, comment, review) fits. AgSy is a systems-science journal, so the router's first job is to confirm there is a real systems question — interactions, hierarchical levels, trade-offs — not a single-factor field trial. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use to understand how Agricultural Systems (AgSy) evaluates a manuscript — single-anonymized peer review with a minimum of two reviewers and an editor decision, desk screening for fit and systems content, what reviewers weigh, and the rapid-review track for Perspectives. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when preparing the data, code, and model materials for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript. AgSy applies Elsevier's research-data policy, which treats software, code, and models as research data — deposit them in a repository and cite/link them, or state why they cannot be shared. Covers model-description standards and exemptions. Prepares the materials; it does not waive requirements.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when building figures and tables for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so exhibits communicate interactions, dynamics, trade-offs, and model performance clearly. AgSy is a systems journal, so the best exhibits show trade-off frontiers, observed-vs-simulated fit, resource flows, and conceptual system diagrams — not just a bar chart of one treatment. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when targeting the Annual Review of Environment and Resources or deciding whether an environment-and-resources synthesis fits this invited-review venue. Encodes the journal's invited-review fit, the authoritative-synthesis bar, structure expectations, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Agricultural Systems (AgSy) via the current Elsevier submission path / Editorial Manager — article-type selection, abstract <= 250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract, CRediT and declaration-of-interest statements, funding/AI disclosures, reference style, and data/code/model availability. Final checks; it does not draft content.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when writing the response to an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) revision decision. AgSy review is single anonymized with at least two expert systems reviewers and an editor decision, and revisions often turn on model evaluation, sensitivity/uncertainty, and trade-off framing. The response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.