Philipp J. Thoss

Map the intellectual property landscape for a technology domain or product area. Covers patent cluster analysis, white space identification, competitor IP portfolio assessment, freedom-to-operate preliminary screening, and strategic IP positioning recommendations. Use before starting R&D in a new technology area, when evaluating market entry against incumbents with strong patent portfolios, preparing for investment due diligence, informing a patent filing strategy, or assessing freedom-to-operate risk for a new product.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conduct temperament-based health assessment from Hildegard von Bingen's Causae et Curae. Evaluates the four temperaments (sanguine, choleric, melancholic, phlegmatic), elemental correspondences (air, fire, earth, water), and provides dietary and lifestyle recommendations for rebalancing. Use when understanding constitutional type in Hildegardian terms, experiencing imbalance (fatigue, digestive issues, mental fog) needing holistic guidance, seeking dietary recommendations by temperament, or researching medieval humoral medicine.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluate a system's current structural form, identify transformation pressure, and classify transformation readiness. Covers structural inventory, pressure mapping, rigidity assessment, change capacity estimation, and readiness classification for architectural metamorphosis. Use before any significant architectural change to understand the starting point, when a system feels stuck without clear reasons, when external pressure from growth or tech debt is mounting, or as periodic health checks for long-lived systems.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI context assessment — evaluating problem malleability, mapping structural rigidity versus flexibility, analyzing transformation pressure, and estimating capacity to adapt. Use when a complex task feels stuck and it is unclear whether to push through or pivot, before a significant approach change to assess whether the current reasoning structure can support it, when accumulated workarounds suggest the underlying approach may be wrong, or as a periodic structural health check during extended multi-step tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Construct well-structured arguments using the hypothesis-argument-example triad. Covers formulating falsifiable hypotheses, building logical arguments (deductive, inductive, analogical, evidential), providing concrete examples, and steelmanning counterarguments. Use when writing or reviewing PR descriptions that propose technical changes, justifying design decisions in ADRs, constructing substantive code review feedback, or building a research argument or technical proposal.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Appraise gemstone value using the four Cs (color, clarity, cut, carat), origin assessment, treatment detection, and market factor analysis. Advisory educational guidance only — not a certified appraisal. Use when understanding factors that determine a gemstone's value, pre-screening stones before a professional appraisal, evaluating whether a seller's asking price is reasonable, learning gemstone grading methodology, or understanding how treatment status affects value.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply semantic versioning (SemVer 2.0.0) to determine the correct version bump based on change analysis. Covers major/minor/patch classification, pre-release identifiers, build metadata, and breaking change detection. Use when preparing a new release to determine the correct version number, after merging changes before tagging, evaluating whether a change constitutes a breaking change, adding pre-release identifiers, or resolving disagreement about what version bump is appropriate.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Read-only audit of a GitHub repository's security posture. Gathers ref protection (rulesets AND classic branch protection), Actions token permissions, code and supply-chain features (Dependabot, secret scanning, push protection, CodeQL), and repo hygiene toggles via `gh api`, then classifies findings against essential / recommended / advanced tiers into a PASS/GAP report. Makes NO changes. Use when reviewing a repo before open-sourcing or a release, auditing a public user-owned repo whose CI auto-commits to the default branch, verifying a hardening change actually took effect, or producing a baseline security posture report for a repository.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematically identify whether a GPU kernel is compute-bound, memory-bound, or latency-bound using roofline analysis, occupancy calculations, compute/load ratio per tile, and SASS instruction inspection. Produces a decision matrix for optimization strategy selection (cp.async, warp interleaving, tiling, double-buffering, or CuAssembler hand-tuning).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze an arbitrary codebase to identify functions, APIs, and data sources suitable for exposure as MCP tools, producing a tool specification document. Use when planning an MCP server for an existing project, auditing a codebase before wrapping it as an AI-accessible tool surface, comparing what a codebase can do versus what is already exposed via MCP, or generating a tool spec to hand off to scaffold-mcp-server.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze an arbitrary codebase to auto-detect workflows, data pipelines, and file dependencies using putior's put_auto() engine. Produces an annotation plan that maps detected I/O patterns to source files across 30+ supported languages with 902 auto-detection patterns. Use when onboarding onto an unfamiliar codebase to understand data flow, starting putior integration in a project without existing annotations, auditing a project's data pipeline before documentation, or preparing an annotation plan before running annotate-source-files.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Four-stage alchemical code transmutation — nigredo (decomposition), albedo (purification), citrinitas (illumination), rubedo (synthesis) — with meditate and heal checkpoints between stages. Transforms tangled or legacy code into optimized, well-structured output through systematic material analysis. Use when transforming legacy code into modern equivalents, refactoring deeply tangled modules where incremental fixes keep failing, converting a codebase between paradigms, or when simpler refactoring approaches have stalled and a full-cycle transformation is needed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.