Audits fielded survey-response data for registered elements, data quality, bot and AI-automation screening, and sample integrity, and produces an appendix-ready quality report. Use at soft launch before full field, after fielding before outcomes are analyzed, or when asked what a study did about bots and AI respondents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Advises on setting up LLM-based text classification as a validated measurement design. Covers codebook construction, learning-regime and model choice, prompt construction, validation against human coding with kappa and F1, hybrid human-LLM review, downstream measurement error, and reporting, plus a short resumable batch pattern with a rule-based baseline for repeated free text against a closed codebook. Use when the user wants to classify, code, or label text at scale. Category discovery goes to topic-modeling.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Advises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text. Covers the discovery-versus-measurement question, choosing STM, LDA, or BERTopic, preprocessing consequences, prevalence and content formulas, topic-count selection across coherence, exclusivity and FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validation of topics against human judgment, robustness, and DA-RT-compliant reporting. Use when the user has open-ended responses or another corpus and asks what topics are present, how many topics to use, about STM, searchK, coherence, or FREX, or wants topic prevalence compared across treatment arms or countries. Fixed-codebook coding goes to text-classification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Runs a deliberative two-model committee of GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus under a selectable chair, Fable by default, with `/model-committee-astra`, `/model-committee-opus`, and `/model-committee-sol` selecting the others. Use when a consequential decision has several defensible options and two model families should propose, critique, revise, and cross-rank them against a predeclared rubric before converging, as in research design, interpretation, architecture, manuscript strategy, or evaluation design. Not for factual lookups, independent-coder reliability, brainstorming, routine implementation, or final professional judgment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
OCRs scanned or image-only corpora with vision-language models in four phases. Triage inventories the scans, identifies script and language, and shortlists models by script, hardware, and data constraints. Evaluate selects a system by measured CER or WER against ground truth, using born-digital twins, a second reader, and decision rules set in advance. Run builds the production pipeline. Clean removes model artifacts, audits what every cleaning rule deletes, corrects with rule-based and LLM passes, and records provenance. Use when choosing an OCR model for a corpus, measuring OCR accuracy, transcribing scans at scale, or correcting raw OCR. Born-digital documents with text layers go to doc-to-markdown; runs on Leiden's ALICE cluster add vlm-ocr-alice.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Reads or converts documents in a research workflow, including PDF, Word, PowerPoint, Excel, OpenDocument, RTF, EPUB, and CSV. Chooses direct reading or conversion, selects a converter from document structure, and decides whether the Markdown is tracked or temporary. Use when a document must be read, quoted, summarized, searched, extracted, or added to a source library. Scanned documents go to vlm-ocr and bulk intake to research-repo.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Drafts a referee report for a journal editor. Produces a recommendation, claim-and-design summary, three to six decision-driving concerns, additional concerns, and a revision plan through five parallel adversarial finders, Breaker, Butcher, Shredder, Void, Situator, a Blue Team error filter, Chief Reviewer synthesis, Tone Guard legal pass, and optional confidential editor note. Use when the user has been asked to referee a manuscript. Self-audits go to paper-review-lite or presubmit, and author responses go to referee-response.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs and diagnoses list experiments (the item count technique), covering whether indirect measurement is warranted, control-list construction against floor and ceiling effects, design variants, estimators and assumption tests in the list package, and power planning for the precision penalty. Use when the user measures a sensitive attitude or behavior and asks about list experiments, item count, unmatched count, or veiled questioning, or has an implausible prevalence estimate. Deciding whether sensitivity bias exists at all goes to survey-design.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Builds or audits a literature review, producing an evidence map, the closest prior work, source clusters, a gap verdict, and a synthesis plan for the introduction. Use when the user asks whether a contribution is novel, who has studied a question, what the literature establishes, or how to organize a review, or wants a reading list, Zotero export, or pile of papers turned into one. For systematic reviews or meta-analyses it produces the protocol scaffold and routes registration (PROSPERO or OSF) and screening to dedicated tools.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Drafts or audits a scientific paper’s introduction and framing — the real-world "why", an evidence audit, the funnel from theory to a falsifiable if-then with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and a contribution list matched to the design. Use when the user asks to write, restructure, or critique an introduction, motivate or frame a paper, repair a gap-in-the-literature opening, sharpen or calibrate a contribution claim, or connect experiments into one argument. Sentence-level flow and wording are out of scope.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Typesets a working paper or journal submission in house-style LaTeX from Markdown, Word (.docx), TeX, ODT, RTF, or HTML. Converts with pandoc, wraps the body in an EB Garamond template, builds the PDF with latexmk, and sets journal-specific spacing, page limits, anonymization, disclosures, and citation style. Use to format or convert a paper to LaTeX, make a working paper, or prepare a submission to a named journal.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Writes or reviews a pre-analysis plan before data collection — registry choice (OSF, AEA RCT Registry, AsPredicted, registered reports), PAP structure, models and decision rules locked in advance, analysis code run on simulated data, contingencies for attrition, failed manipulations, and exclusions, deviation records, and timeline. Operationalizes the pre-data-collection side of DA-RT. Use when the user asks to draft or audit a pre-registration or PAP, choose a registry, decide what to lock versus leave exploratory, or handle a later deviation. Hypotheses and estimands come from hypothesis-building, post-hoc reporting from methods-reporting.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Launches and configures the standalone presubmit CLI, an API-driven adversarial peer-review pipeline with 30-plus stages, including Red Team finders, Blue Team defence, verification cascade, legal pass, and copyedit, producing one consolidated report on disk. Verifies installation and API key, chooses the output location and smoke, standard, or custom mode, launches the run, and reports the result path. Use when the user asks to run presubmit, wants a deep unattended pre-submission audit, or needs a math or replication-code audit. Everyday self-audits go to paper-review-lite, and external refereeing to journal-review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Organizes an author’s response to peer review. Extracts every referee and editor point, tags severity and type, orders the revision by dependency, flags defensible pushbacks as questions, and builds a numbered comment → response → location letter whose substantive answers the author writes. Use when the user has referee reports, a revise-and-resubmit decision, or an editor’s letter and wants to plan the revision, draft the response letter, or check that every point was addressed. The reviewer-side twin is journal-review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plans a research project as a decision map that persists across sessions, resolving one ticket per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. The map lives as Markdown in the repository, literature sweeps run as parallel research tickets, and the resolved map compiles into a pre-analysis plan. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation can hold, or when planning restarts each session. Not for executing analyses or writing the paper.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs survey instruments, covering question wording, scale construction and index reliability, flow and treatment placement, pretesting and soft launches, respondent burden with attention and speeding rules, sensitive questions and social-desirability bias, and treatment delivery. Use when the user writes or revises survey questions, chooses a scale, orders blocks, plans a pilot, or worries respondents will not answer honestly. Indirect measurement goes to list-experiment, multi-country instruments to cross-national-design, and live-survey operations to qualtrics-ops.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs publication tables for social-science manuscripts. Covers whether a result belongs in a table at all, column order, row grouping and panels, decimal precision, standard-error and confidence-interval conventions, self-contained titles and notes, and code-generated output. Use when building or revising a regression, balance, descriptive, or robustness table, or when working with modelsummary, stargazer, gt, esttab, or booktabs. Finished tables go to figure-table-audit for end-stage QA.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs and diagnoses list experiments (the item count technique): whether indirect measurement is warranted, control-list construction, design variants, estimators and assumption tests in the list package, and power. Use when measuring a sensitive item or debugging an implausible prevalence estimate.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Builds or audits a literature review: evidence map, closest prior work, gap verdict, and synthesis plan. Use to check whether a contribution is novel, map what a literature establishes, or organize a review; systematic reviews get a protocol scaffold.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plans a research project as a durable decision map, resolving one design decision per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation holds, or when planning keeps restarting. Not for running analyses or writing the paper.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Drafts or audits a scientific paper's introduction: real-world motivation, evidence audit, theory-to-if-then funnel with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and calibrated contributions. Use to write, frame, or critique an introduction.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs multi-country survey experiments, covering case selection with a stated comparative logic, instrument localization and TRAPD translation, stimulus calibration, per-country power, and pooled versus per-country analysis with measurement-equivalence checks. Use when the user fields the same experiment in several countries, asks which countries to include, how to adapt an instrument without breaking comparability, whether to pool, or how large each country sample must be. Question wording goes to survey-design, reporting to methods-reporting, the study plan to pre-registration-writing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Reads a model's own uncertainty from token log-probabilities: collecting and aggregating label logprobs, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration against human labels (ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams), downstream use, and reproducibility. Use for per-item classifier confidence or routing low-confidence cases to human review; codebook and validation design go to text-classification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generates 3-5 conceptually distinct approaches labeled Novel, Surprising, Diverse, or Conventional, and holds for the user's selection before implementing. The --codex mode runs the brainstorm on GPT-6 Astra via codex exec, then has Codex implement the selected approach. Use before committing to an approach when a creative, architectural, or analytical task has more than one non-obvious solution; use --codex when another model family should widen the range.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.