Refactor code to remove dead code, useless comments, unused variables, and unused imports. Use when asked to declutter a class, clean up noisy code, remove cruft, or run `/refactor:declutter`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
63건(SDiamante13의 저장소) · 인기순
Refactor code to remove dead code, useless comments, unused variables, and unused imports. Use when asked to declutter a class, clean up noisy code, remove cruft, or run `/refactor:declutter`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Refactor code by renaming variables, methods, classes, and concepts for clearer intent. Use when asked to improve names, clarify naming, perform a naming pass, or run `/refactor:names`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Refactor Swift code toward declarative functional programming with immutability, value types, pure functions, transformations, and closure-based APIs. Use when asked for functional refactoring or `/refactor:functional`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Compress review pressure into the right next action instead of more code by default. Classify findings, reject non-liabilities, and choose proof-only vs minimal-fix vs refactor-kernel, preventing one-patch-per-comment churn. Use after a code review — PR comments, reviewer suggestions, or audit findings — and especially when you are about to reflexively patch every comment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write acceptance criteria for a Jira story using Given/When/Then scenarios. Use this skill when the user asks to write AC, acceptance criteria, write scenarios, improve a story, add AC to a ticket, or mentions a Jira ticket and wants better requirements. Also triggers on "write better AC", "this story needs AC", "add scenarios to this ticket", or when reviewing a Jira story for completeness.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze a class or module for code smells and produce a prioritized refactoring plan. Use when the user asks for code smell analysis, says `/smells`, or runs `/refactor:smells`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Heuristic-first software surgery for proof-backed, minimal-diff implementation: Contract to Invariants to Cut Rationale to inevitable incision to Proof. Use when users say "run /tw-tk", "patch-first", "keep the diff small", "state contract + invariants", "one clear incision", "fix it with a validation signal", or orchestration cues like "workers use /tw-tk" / "internally use /tw-tk".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Refactor duplicated code by extracting helpers, shared abstractions, or clearer reusable structure. Use when asked to apply DRY, remove duplication, consolidate repeated logic, or run `/refactor:dry`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Set up and manage a UI redesign experiment with three git worktree branches for modern minimal, bold creative, and classic refined design directions. Use when asked to run a UI redesign experiment, compare design approaches, or prototype multiple visual directions in parallel branches.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Refactor a class toward the Single Responsibility Principle by identifying responsibilities, grouping cohesive behavior, and extracting focused classes. Use when the user says `/srp`, asks for SRP refactoring, or runs `/refactor:srp`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Refine an existing skill in place with minimal diffs. Trigger when asked to improve a skill's trigger description/frontmatter, workflow text, metadata, scripts/references/assets; also for requests to iterate, refactor, rename, or fix a skill using usage/session-mining evidence (for example from /tw-seq).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Refactor long methods or large code blocks by extracting small, focused helper methods with clear names and narrow responsibilities. Use when asked to extract methods or run `/refactor:methods`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze code for primitive obsession and plan value object extractions around domain concepts, validation, and grouped primitive fields. Use when the user says `/value-objects`, asks for value object refactoring, or runs `/refactor:value-objects`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Mutation testing patterns for verifying test effectiveness. Use when analyzing branch code to find weak or missing tests.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply Steven's Bash script style rules: strict mode, minimal validation, concise logic, executable scripts, and no unnecessary comments or echoes. Use when creating, reviewing, or refactoring shell scripts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate onboarding documentation for a codebase — architecture overview, key files, local setup, and common gotchas. Use this skill whenever someone asks to onboard onto a codebase, create onboarding docs, generate a codebase overview, explain a project's architecture to newcomers, or asks "how does this codebase work". Also trigger when users say things like "document this repo for new devs", "write a getting started guide", or "help me understand this project".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Rebuilds session context after a clear by reading git history, plans, and beads state. Triggers on 'catch up'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Gauntlet for absolute claims (always/never/guaranteed/optimal); pressure-test, then refine with explicit boundaries. Use when users ask to prove or disprove strong certainty claims, request devil's-advocate challenge rounds, or want the /tw-prove-it gauntlet to run all 10 rounds continuously by default.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Split user stories into smaller, independently deliverable slices using the SPIDR method (Spike, Path, Interface, Data, Rules). Use this skill whenever the user asks to split a story, break down work, slice a story, asks "can this be split", mentions "SPIDR", says "story splitting", or wants to decompose a large ticket into smaller pieces. Also trigger when a user presents a story that seems too large for a single sprint and asks for help sizing or scoping it.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when adding a test to an existing codebase for behavior that is already implemented. Ensures the test is meaningful by mutation-verifying it — breaking the production code to confirm the test fails for the expected reason. Triggers when the user says "add a test for existing behavior", "backfill test coverage", "the test passes on first run", or any scenario where a test is written without a corresponding new production change.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn 'should never happen' into 'cannot happen' by defining owned inductive invariants and enforcing them at parse/construct/API/DB/lock/txn boundaries with a verification signal. Use when prompts mention invariants, impossible states, validation sprawl, cache/index drift, idempotency/versioning, retries/duplicates/out-of-order events, race/linearization bugs, loop correctness, or hardening another workflow (for example /tw-fix) with invariant checks first.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Compile up to five durable insights from the current conversation for possible addition to CLAUDE.md. Use before clearing context, when asked to remember lessons, or when the user wants project conventions and preferences preserved.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Mine Claude Code session data for analytics — token usage, tool rankings, skill invocations, session search, and prompt history. Use when asked about session stats, token costs, tool frequency, skill usage patterns, or finding past sessions by prompt text.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.