스킬 찾기

Use this skill when the implementation status column of a statement of applicability may not match reality, and the team asks "is our SoA accurate", "check the implemented column", "do we have evidence for every implemented control", "reconcile the SoA with our evidence", "pre-audit evidence check" or "the auditor found a control marked implemented with no records". Samples the records behind every control marked implemented, grades the evidence, proposes a corrected status for each row and writes a reconciliation table plus an evidence gap list with owners.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a statement of applicability already exists and the team wants its exclusions to survive the audit, and asks "review our SoA exclusions", "is this a valid justification", "can we exclude physical security if we are fully remote", "the auditor challenged our not applicable controls", "rewrite our exclusion justifications" or "we outsource it, so it does not apply, right". Tests every excluded control against scope, assets, activities, suppliers, risks and commitments, gives each a keep, rewrite, reverse or ask verdict, and writes a review table plus rewritten justifications for the owner to approve.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the company acts as a processor for its customers and someone asks "update our subprocessor list", "are we missing subprocessors", "we added a new tool, do we need to tell customers", "check the public subprocessor page", "where is customer data processed" or "draft the subprocessor change notice". Finds which suppliers actually receive customer personal data, compares them with the published list, records purpose, data, locations and transfer basis for each, works out the customer notice duties from the signed agreements, and writes an updated register, a change list and a draft notice for review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when personal data goes, or will go, to a recipient outside the EEA, or someone asks "do we need a TIA", "transfer impact assessment", "SCCs for this vendor", "can we use this US vendor under GDPR", "international data transfer assessment", "Schrems II assessment" or "our customer asked for our transfer assessments". Confirms whether there is a transfer at all, maps the full chain including remote access and sub-processors, identifies the transfer mechanism, structures the destination law assessment from sourced material, proposes supplementary measures and drafts a documented assessment with a review trigger.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when an engineering team needs a secure development policy, or has one that does not match how code really ships, and asks "write our secure SDLC policy", "secure development policy from our CI", "document our code review and scanning for the audit", "what does our pipeline already enforce", "change management for engineers" or "secure coding policy for SOC 2 or CRA". Reads the repositories and pipeline definitions, inventories what is actually enforced (reviews, checks, scanners, deploy gates, dependency and secret controls), and writes a policy whose every "must" points to the place it is enforced, with gaps listed as decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a team must define what its management system covers before a certification project, or its current scope is one vague sentence, and asks "write our ISMS scope", "what should be in scope", "can we exclude the sales office", "scope for the certificate", "draw the boundary of our management system" or "the auditor says our scope is unclear". Drafts the scope statement with boundaries, interfaces, dependencies and justified exclusions, for a security, privacy or AI management system, and writes a statement file plus a boundary table of open questions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company has a risk assessment and treatment plan and now needs its first statement of applicability, and asks "build our SoA", "draft the statement of applicability", "which controls apply to us", "SoA from the risk treatment plan", "justify inclusions and exclusions" or "our SoA says implemented everywhere". Drafts one row per control of the reader's framework with the inclusion decision, the risk or obligation behind it, an implementation status taken from records, an evidence pointer and an owner role, and writes a CSV statement plus notes of open decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a certification audit is booked and the team wants to know whether the first stage will go through, and asks "are we ready for stage 1", "pre-audit readiness check", "what will the auditor read first", "documentation review before the certification audit", "mock stage 1" or "what would stop the audit". Walks the documentation set the way a certification auditor reads it, checks that documents agree with each other and with the records, and writes a list of stoppers, likely findings and polish items with an owner and a fix for each.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company needs to decide how much assessment each supplier deserves, or asks "tier our vendors", "which suppliers are critical", "we have 200 vendors and cannot assess them all", "build a third-party risk tiering", "rank suppliers by risk" or "which vendors need a security review this year". Builds the complete supplier population from finance, single sign-on and contracts, scores each supplier on data, access and dependency, assigns a tier by the highest axis, sets the assessment depth and cycle per tier, and writes a tiered list with the reason for every score.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a supplier has returned a security questionnaire, assurance report, certificate or trust pack and someone asks "review this vendor's answers", "is this supplier safe to use", "read their SOC report for us", "what should we ask the vendor next", "triage the vendor security assessment" or "does their certificate cover the service we buy". Checks report and certificate scope against the service in use, sorts answers into evidenced, asserted, contradicted and evasive, lists the obligations the report puts back on the customer, and writes a triage note with follow-up questions and a proposed decision for the owner.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company needs its information security policy set written or rebuilt, or asks "write our security policies", "draft the information security policy", "we need policies for the audit", "policy pack for a startup", "our template policies are 40 documents nobody reads" or "which policies do we actually need". Maps the policy set to the company's size and owners, drafts the top-level policy and the topic policies in testable language that reflects what the company does, flags commitments that need a decision, and prepares the approval and communication record for leadership.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when an external audit, attestation examination or assessment is coming and the team wants populations and evidence ready for the samples the auditor will pull, or asks "prepare for audit sampling", "what samples will the auditor ask for", "get our populations ready", "the auditor wants a list of all changes in the period", "evidence for the leavers sample", "Type II sample prep" or "how do we prove completeness of the population". Lists the populations an auditor is likely to sample, builds each from the system of record with the query that produced it, checks completeness and the evidence behind a dry-run sample, and writes a readiness file per population plus a list of gaps to fix before fieldwork.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when process owners, engineers or executives will be interviewed in an external or internal audit and need to be ready, or when someone asks "prepare the team for the auditor interviews", "what will the auditor ask our CTO", "interview briefing for the audit", "how should people answer the auditor", "mock audit interviews" or "our engineers are nervous about the audit". Builds a one-page brief per role: what the auditor is likely to ask, the records that person should be able to open, the honest way to answer what they do not know, and a short mock interview, plus an interview schedule with the evidence each session needs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a restore test is due, an auditor or customer asks for proof that backups can be recovered, or someone says "plan a restore test", "prove we can recover in time", "our backups succeed but we never restored", "test our RTO and RPO", "write up the disaster recovery test" or "document the backup restore for the audit". Picks what to restore, writes a test plan with success criteria set before the test, records timings against the recovery objectives, and produces a signed-off test record with the issues found and their owners.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the company is about to buy, renew or switch on an AI product or an AI feature inside an existing product, and asks "assess this AI vendor", "do they train on our data", "AI supplier questionnaire", "review the AI terms", "can we use this model provider with customer data", "who are the subprocessors behind this AI tool" or "AI vendor risk assessment". Sizes the review to the use, reads the terms, data processing agreement and documentation before asking questions, checks training use, retention, model changes, subprocessors, transfers, security and exit, and writes an assessment with a recommendation plus the follow-up questions for the vendor.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when one AI system needs its impact on people and on the company assessed before launch, after a significant change, or because a customer, auditor or regulator asks for it, and the team says "AI impact assessment", "assess the impact of this model", "fundamental rights impact assessment", "who could this AI harm", "bias assessment before launch" or "sign-off for the AI feature". Describes the system in its context, works through impacts on the people it affects with evidence, sizes them, proposes mitigations with measurable triggers, and writes one assessment ready for the system owner and an accountable executive to sign.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a periodic user access review is due, an auditor asked for access review evidence, or someone says "prepare the access review", "run the quarterly user recertification", "who still has admin", "check leavers still have access", "build the access review sheets for managers" or "our last review was a rubber stamp". Picks the systems in scope, builds account populations reconciled against HR, pre-flags leavers, orphans, shared and dormant accounts, assigns independent reviewers, defines the decisions to record, and plans the removal follow-up.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company needs to know what AI it builds, buys or uses, before an AI governance programme, an AI regulation review or a customer questionnaire, and asks "list our AI systems", "build an AI register", "AI inventory", "where are we using AI", "find shadow AI", "which of our vendors use AI" or "what AI do we have before the AI Act". Discovers AI systems from procurement, single sign-on, code and teams, records one entry per use case with owner, purpose, data, affected people and the company's role, and writes a CSV register plus notes of borderline cases and open questions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company needs a working process for privacy requests, or just received one and has none, and asks "DSAR procedure", "how do we handle a subject access request", "someone asked us to delete their data", "right to erasure process", "data subject rights workflow", "GDPR request handling" or "we missed the one-month deadline". Designs intake from any channel, a proportionate identity check, the system search map, review and redaction, response templates per right, deadline tracking and a request log, written as a procedure the support and privacy teams can run.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a customer or prospect has sent a security questionnaire, due diligence form or vendor assessment and someone asks "answer this security questionnaire", "fill in the customer's vendor assessment", "draft answers from our policies", "we have 300 questions due Friday", "reuse our previous questionnaire answers" or "which answers can we not back up". Drafts every answer from the company's own documents with a source and a confidence level, flags answers without evidence and answers that create commitments, checks consistency with past answers, and writes an answer sheet plus a list of items for owners to confirm.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a set of policies, procedures, plans and registers has grown in pieces and someone asks "check our documents for contradictions", "are our policies consistent", "the retention periods don't match", "which severity scale is right", "harmonise our ISMS documents", "cross-check the incident plan against the policy" or "clean up our documentation before the audit". Extracts the checkable facts from every document (periods, deadlines, scales, roles, labels, references), finds contradictions, naming drift and broken references, proposes which document owns each fact, and drafts a glossary and a fix list for the owners.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a data processing agreement is being negotiated or renewed and someone asks "review the TOMs annex", "check the security measures in this DPA", "can we sign this annex", "the customer sent their DPA with a security schedule", "is our standard annex still true" or "does this vendor's annex promise enough". Breaks the technical and organisational measures annex into single commitments, compares each one with what the company actually runs or with what the use case needs, and writes a line-by-line review, proposed redlines and a list of practice gaps for owners.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a new product feature, vendor, AI use, monitoring tool or change in processing raises the question "do we need a DPIA", or someone asks "DPIA screening", "is this high risk processing", "data protection impact assessment threshold", "privacy impact screening for this feature", "does our AI feature need a DPIA" or "document why we did not do a DPIA". Describes the processing with numbers, tests it against the GDPR cases, the supervisory authority's list and the EDPB-endorsed criteria, reaches a reasoned outcome (required, recommended, not required) with a re-screen trigger, and keeps a screening log for accountability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company that already runs a security management system wants to add an AI management system, or is preparing for an AI governance certification, and asks "scope our AI management system", "what should the AIMS cover", "AI governance roles", "who owns AI governance", "extend our ISMS to AI" or "write the AI management system scope statement". Decides which AI systems, roles, teams and lifecycle stages are in, maps interfaces and dependencies, reuses the processes the security system already runs, assigns roles with a RACI, and writes the scope statement, the roles file and the open questions for leadership.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.