Use when a diff needs a readability review — naming, single-responsibility, DRY, dead code, mismatch with codebase conventions — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
245건 · 관련도순
Use when a diff needs a readability review — naming, single-responsibility, DRY, dead code, mismatch with codebase conventions — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit over-engineered codebases by factoring layers into live obligations, quotienting redundant distinctions, ablating unearned surface, and normalizing survivors while preserving required behavior. Use when change latency or agent difficulty comes from frameworks, plugins, DI, codegen, task runners, config indirection, ORMs, GraphQL, monorepo/infra tooling, or web stacks, or when asked to remove layers. Produces an evidence-backed Reduction Certificate, cuts, migration phases, proof signals, and rollback. Not for one local readability cleanup (use tw-complexity-mitigator).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Mitigate incidental code complexity when control flow is tangled, nesting is deep, names are hard to parse, or reasoning requires cross-file hops. Use when a review stalls on readability, you need an analysis-first refactor plan before edits, or you want essential-vs-incidental verdicts, ranked simplification steps, a small structural sketch, and a TRACE assessment (analysis-only; no edits).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Research-grounded typography for any text-bearing surface — web, PDF, email, documents. GENERATIVE: apply correct line length, font sizing, contrast, dark mode, mobile, and Japanese rules from the start when building any UI, page, layout, or document. REVIEW: audit existing CSS/HTML/templates for typography violations. Use this skill whenever you are writing CSS that touches font-size, line-height, max-width, color, or font-family. Use it when building any frontend component, page, or layout — even if the user doesn't mention typography. Use it when reviewing any rendered output for readability. Use it when generating PDFs, emails, or any formatted document. If text will be read by a human, this skill applies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conducts a multi-axis code review (correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance) before merging. Use before merging any change, after finishing a feature or bug fix, when reviewing code another agent or person wrote, or when asked to review a diff or pull request.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
生成した handout 資料が初心者に伝わるか読みやすさレビューを依頼したいとき、独立 context のレビュアーから指摘と根拠つきの verdict を回収したいときに使う。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
A six-year-old code reviewer who asks "why?" about everything. Catches over-engineering, confusing names, and unnecessary complexity, then corrects the code according to the language spec, but through kids eyes, maintaining simplicity and readability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detects deeply nested loops with duplicated inline logic and recommends extracting into small, named functions. Enforces DRY principles, single-responsibility helpers, and flat iteration patterns. Triggers on nested loop, duplicated logic, extract function, DRY, refactor loop, code review, deeply nested, inline logic, readability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Use when asked to "simplify code", "clean up code", "refactor for clarity", "improve readability", or review recently modified code for elegance. Focuses on project-specific best practices.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Check code for standardization, readability, maintenance complexity, and defensive coding practices
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Use when asked to "simplify code", "clean up code", "refactor for clarity", "improve readability", or review recently modified code for elegance. Focuses on project-specific best practices.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a user asks to "proofread", "review and correct", "fix grammar", "improve readability while keeping my voice", and to proofread a document file and save an updated version.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Applies principles from Robert C. Martin's 'Clean Code'. Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to ensure high quality, readability, and maintainability. Covers naming, functio...
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
two-stage review (spec compliance first, then code quality), refactoring, and quality improvement. Use when reviewing code, eliminating code smells, reducing technical debt, refactoring methods, running self-critique loops, or improving maintainability and readability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert en revue de code (PR reviews, patterns, anti-patterns, security, performance, readability)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
[Design System] Quantitative accessibility audit for UI - contrast ratios, font sizes, tap targets, heading hierarchy. Use when (1) checking WCAG color contrast compliance, (2) auditing text sizes for readability, (3) validating touch/click target sizes, (4) reviewing heading structure and landmarks, (5) user asks to 'check accessibility', 'audit contrast', 'WCAG compliance', or 'a11y check'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run four parallel read-only subagents that each review the same diff from a different lens — security, performance, correctness, and readability — then merge findings into one report. Use before merging large or risky PRs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Use when asked to "simplify code", "clean up code", "refactor for clarity", "improve readability", or review recently modified code for elegance. Focuses on project-specific best practices.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Improve how interfaces use photos, screenshots, icons, illustrations, and user-uploaded media so visuals support clarity instead of undermining it. Use when the user mentions images, screenshots, background photos, hero images, icon sizing, user-uploaded media, crops, overlays, or image readability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Refactor Spring Boot and Java code to improve maintainability, readability, and adherence to enterprise best practices. This skill transforms messy Spring Boot applications into clean, well-structured solutions following SOLID principles and Spring Boot 3.x conventions. It addresses fat controllers, improper transaction boundaries, field injection anti-patterns, and scattered configuration. Leverages Java 21+ features including record patterns, pattern matching for switch, virtual threads, and sequenced collections.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Improve code structure, readability, and maintainability without changing external behavior through systematic refactoring techniques like extracting functions, removing duplication, simplifying conditionals, and applying design patterns. Use when reducing technical debt, extracting functions or classes, removing code duplication, simplifying complex conditionals, renaming for clarity, applying design patterns, improving code organization, reducing coupling, increasing cohesion, or maintaining test coverage during structural improvements.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Simplify application code for clarity without changing behavior — refactor after tests pass, reduce nesting and duplication, match project conventions. Load when refactoring for readability, cleaning up after a feature ships, or when code review flags complexity. Also triggers on "simplify this code", "code simplification", "make this easier to read", "reduce complexity", "refactor for clarity". Not for compress/split/prune-skill (skill-library files). Pairs with technical-debt-audit.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design accessible dark-mode interfaces with contrast, elevation, system-preference, and cross-device readability guidance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detects and fixes color contrast violations using WCAG 2.1 guidelines and perceptual analysis. Expert in contrast ratio calculation, color blindness simulation, and providing accessible alternatives. Activate on "check contrast", "color accessibility", "WCAG audit", "readability check", "contrast ratio", "hard to read", "can't see text". NOT for general color theory (use color-theory-palette-harmony-expert), brand color selection (use web-design-expert), or non-visual accessibility (use ux-friction-analyzer).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.