'failure' 검색 결과

Analyzes time-series and longitudinal RNA-seq for differential expression and trajectory structure. Covers DESeq2 LRT with reduced models, time as factor vs continuous vs natural splines, maSigPro (Nueda 2014 for RNA-seq), ImpulseDE2 with explicit impulse-model failure modes, DREAM for repeated measures via linear mixed models, pseudoreplication avoidance, conditional vs marginal modeling, and trajectory clustering with DPGP, Mfuzz (with Schwämmle 2010 fuzzifier estimation), and splines+k-means. Use when modeling time-course or longitudinal expression, choosing factor vs spline, handling repeated measures from the same subject, avoiding pseudoreplication, clustering temporal trajectories, or selecting between dedicated time-course tools and pairwise+LRT.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-sequencing (ONT DRS) signal data using m6Anet (Hendra 2022 *Nat Methods* 19:1590; multiple-instance-learning neural network over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the required upstream pipeline (Dorado / Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 transcriptome alignment with `-ax map-ont -uf -k14 --secondary=no` -> nanopolish eventalign with `--scale-events --signal-index` (m6Anet-required) plus `--summary` / `--threads` housekeeping -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability interpretation including the `mod_ratio` per-site stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only modeling constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads per site for stable probability estimates), multi-condition comparison via xPore (Pratanwanich 2021 *Nat Biotechnol* 39:1394), Nanocompore (Leger 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:7198), ELIGOS (Jenjaroenpun 2021 *NAR* 49:e7), and Dorado native modification calling (RNA004 chemistry, 2024+), reference-transcriptome version pinning, the cDNA-vs-DRS chemistry distinction (cDNA-Nanopore CANNOT be used for modification detection), and orthogonal validation against MeRIP / GLORI. Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting per-site `probability_modified` vs `mod_ratio` vs per-read modification probabilities, comparing methylation between conditions from ONT data, deciding between m6Anet for known DRACH sites and Dorado/Remora for genome-wide screening, pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller model versions, or troubleshooting eventalign / dataprep failures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Compare gene co-expression and regulatory networks between biological conditions to find rewired relationships using DiffCorr, DiffCoEx, DINGO/iDINGO, and CoDiNA. Covers the differential-connectivity-is-not-differential-expression distinction, the pairwise multiple-testing explosion, marginal vs partial (direct) rewiring, and the underpowered-rewiring failure mode. Use when comparing co-expression networks between disease vs control, treatment, or developmental stages, or finding hub genes that rewire without changing mean expression. For single-condition modules see coexpression-networks; for differential expression of means see differential-expression/de-results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cross-method decision tree for calling hits in pooled CRISPR screens. Catalogs statistical models (MAGeCK RRA, MAGeCK MLE, BAGEL2, drugZ, JACKS, Chronos, CERES), experimental designs each is built for, failure modes outside design domain, reconciliation when methods disagree, multiple-testing and effect-size thresholds, the order of operations (count -> QC -> CN-correct -> hit-call -> validate), the second-best-sgRNA conservative rule, and consensus-hit strategy. Use when choosing among MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / drugZ / JACKS / Chronos for a given design, reconciling disagreement across two or three methods on the same screen, deciding whether to require consensus, gating downstream validation by hit-confidence tier, or interpreting unstable hit lists across reruns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes pooled CRISPR screens with MAGeCK (Li et al 2014), covering count generation (mageck count), the RRA two-condition workflow (mageck test using alpha-RRA over per-sgRNA negative-binomial p-values), the MLE multi-condition workflow (mageck mle with explicit design matrix and beta-score output), normalization choice (median vs total vs control-sgRNA vs spike-in), sgRNA efficiency injection, paired-sample testing, time-course design, drug-screen versus dropout-screen design matrices, MAGeCKFlute and MAGeCK-VISPR downstream visualization, and decision logic for when to use MAGeCK vs JACKS / BAGEL2 / drugZ / Chronos. Use when running a fresh CRISPR screen analysis, picking RRA vs MLE for the experimental design, choosing a normalization method from QC signatures, debugging MLE convergence failure or NaN beta scores, comparing MAGeCK output across tools, or building a batch-aware multi-cell-line / multi-condition MLE design matrix.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Normalizes ChIP-seq data using exogenous spike-in (ChIP-Rx with Drosophila chromatin per Orlando 2014 / Egan 2016; E. coli carryover for CUT&RUN/CUT&Tag). Distinguishes RRPM from Rx-Input scaling, integrates with DiffBind / DESeq2 / edgeR / csaw via sizeFactors and DiffBind library-size vectors, and applies the Patel et al 2024 *Nat Biotechnol* review's failure-mode framework to validate that normalization is correctly applied at the read level (not peak counts). Use when global signal shifts are expected (HDACi, BETi, EZH2i, dosage, target knockdown), when ChIPseqSpikeInFree detects post-hoc shifts, or when validating internal-control regions before publication.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reads, writes, and converts molecular file formats (SMILES, InChI, SDF V2000/V3000, MOL2, PDB, MMTF) using RDKit and Open Babel with rigorous handling of aromaticity perception, stereochemistry, implicit/explicit hydrogens, kekulization, and salt/fragment separation. Use when loading chemical libraries, debugging parse failures, or preparing molecules for downstream standardization, descriptor calculation, or docking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Add MAUI DevFlow to a .NET MAUI project with agent package references, MauiProgram.cs registration, Blazor WebView support, GTK variants, Central Package Management guidance, and verification commands. USE FOR: first-time DevFlow setup, reviewing what files to edit, choosing DevFlow packages, or continuing after `maui devflow init` installs skills. DO NOT USE FOR: troubleshooting an already-integrated app that cannot connect, iterative app debugging, UI inspection, or generic MAUI build failures (use maui-devflow-debug). INVOKES: maui devflow CLI and dotnet CLI.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a carrier or driver asks about winter trucking, snow chain requirements, hot-weather precautions, summer tire failures, fuel additive use (anti-gel), idle management in extreme temperatures, weight restrictions in spring thaw, or how seasonal demand patterns affect freight rates and capacity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the user asks specifically about preparing for the New Entrant Safety Audit (NESA) under 49 CFR 385 Subpart D — different from a Compliance Review. Covers what auditors look at, the 18-month window, automatic failure conditions, the 60-day fix window, what to NOT do, and how to convert from "new entrant" to permanent authority. Cite 49 CFR 385.301-321.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when an inspector requests ELD records during a roadside inspection. Covers the three required transfer methods, what data must be transmitted, and common failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the user asks about Electronic Logging Device (ELD) compliance under 49 CFR 395.20-38 — ELD mandate, AOBRD vs ELD transition, ELD exemptions, ELD malfunctions, 8-day paper backup, ELD certification on FMCSA registered list, data file integrity, edits + annotations, driver portability, and how to handle ELD failures at roadside. Cite 49 CFR 395.20-395.38.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the user asks about DOT audits, FMCSA compliance reviews, new entrant safety audits (NESA), focused investigations, what auditors actually ask for, audit document checklists, common audit failures, the audit ratings (Satisfactory / Conditional / Unsatisfactory), or how to prepare for an upcoming audit. Cite 49 CFR 385.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

### 1. The Fault/Error/Failure Hierarchy NOT for unrelated tasks outside this domain.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Operations, debugging, and optimization for DAG workflows. Performs root cause analysis on failures, profiles execution performance, aggregates results from parallel branches, bridges context between nodes, and learns patterns from execution history. Activate on "DAG failed", "why did it fail", "root cause", "performance profile", "aggregate results", "merge branches", "execution patterns", "optimize DAG". NOT for planning DAGs (use dag-planner), executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), or validating outputs (use dag-quality).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Propose and safely admit immutable DAG revisions after failures, requirements, resource changes, or unresolved effects. NOT for mutating an executing graph in place or retrying an effect with unknown commit state.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Synthesizes evidence-linked feedback from validation results, confidence evidence, and iteration triggers. Proposes bounded revision guidance for a stated acceptance failure. Activate on 'synthesize feedback', 'improvement suggestions', 'actionable feedback', 'iteration guidance', 'feedback generation'. NOT for iteration detection (use dag-iteration-detector) or convergence tracking (use dag-convergence-monitor).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when applying Cloudflare D1 migrations, fighting Supabase migration history vs SQL execution, choosing direct psql over CLI, designing idempotent migrations, debugging schema drift between local and remote, or recovering after a half-applied migration. Triggers: supabase migration repair instructions appearing, table missing after "applied" status, "Tenant or user not found" when running psql, --remote vs --local D1 confusion, NOT NULL on a populated column, foreign key constraint failures, drift between staging and prod schemas. NOT for Mongo/document migrations, ORM-managed migrations specifically (Prisma/Drizzle have their own conventions), or pure data backfills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Debugs recorded DAG lineage through historical inspection, deterministic decision replay when prerequisites hold, and clearly labeled counterfactual or live re-execution. Activate on "debug DAG", "replay execution", "inspect node state", "compare runs", or "execution diff". NOT for live monitoring (use dag-runtime + websocket-streaming), failure analysis (use dag-ops), or general code debugging.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Facilitate idea generation sessions that actually produce diverse, useful options instead of degenerating into the first plausible answer. Use for product ideation, feature exploration, problem-reframing, naming, design alternatives, strategic option-generation, or any task where the failure mode is "we picked the obvious thing too fast." Covers solo and group sessions, divergence/convergence discipline, technique selection (SCAMPER, Crazy Eights, How Might We, 6-3-5 Brainwriting, Reverse Brainstorming, Worst Possible Idea, Random Stimulus), facilitation moves for handling dominant voices and groupthink, and structured convergence to a shortlist with rationale. Outputs a session artifact with options generated, evaluation, shortlist, and the rejected-but-interesting list.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design AgentSpeak-style BDI plan libraries with explicit event, context, failure, and authority boundaries. NOT for treating BDI plans as safety approval or guaranteed execution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.