2.5천건 · 관련도순
Use this skill when the user asks about DOT audits, FMCSA compliance reviews, new entrant safety audits (NESA), focused investigations, what auditors actually ask for, audit document checklists, common audit failures, the audit ratings (Satisfactory / Conditional / Unsatisfactory), or how to prepare for an upcoming audit. Cite 49 CFR 385.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
### 1. The Fault/Error/Failure Hierarchy NOT for unrelated tasks outside this domain.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Operations, debugging, and optimization for DAG workflows. Performs root cause analysis on failures, profiles execution performance, aggregates results from parallel branches, bridges context between nodes, and learns patterns from execution history. Activate on "DAG failed", "why did it fail", "root cause", "performance profile", "aggregate results", "merge branches", "execution patterns", "optimize DAG". NOT for planning DAGs (use dag-planner), executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), or validating outputs (use dag-quality).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Propose and safely admit immutable DAG revisions after failures, requirements, resource changes, or unresolved effects. NOT for mutating an executing graph in place or retrying an effect with unknown commit state.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Debugs recorded DAG lineage through historical inspection, deterministic decision replay when prerequisites hold, and clearly labeled counterfactual or live re-execution. Activate on "debug DAG", "replay execution", "inspect node state", "compare runs", or "execution diff". NOT for live monitoring (use dag-runtime + websocket-streaming), failure analysis (use dag-ops), or general code debugging.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Synthesizes evidence-linked feedback from validation results, confidence evidence, and iteration triggers. Proposes bounded revision guidance for a stated acceptance failure. Activate on 'synthesize feedback', 'improvement suggestions', 'actionable feedback', 'iteration guidance', 'feedback generation'. NOT for iteration detection (use dag-iteration-detector) or convergence tracking (use dag-convergence-monitor).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when applying Cloudflare D1 migrations, fighting Supabase migration history vs SQL execution, choosing direct psql over CLI, designing idempotent migrations, debugging schema drift between local and remote, or recovering after a half-applied migration. Triggers: supabase migration repair instructions appearing, table missing after "applied" status, "Tenant or user not found" when running psql, --remote vs --local D1 confusion, NOT NULL on a populated column, foreign key constraint failures, drift between staging and prod schemas. NOT for Mongo/document migrations, ORM-managed migrations specifically (Prisma/Drizzle have their own conventions), or pure data backfills.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design AgentSpeak-style BDI plan libraries with explicit event, context, failure, and authority boundaries. NOT for treating BDI plans as safety approval or guaranteed execution.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Facilitate idea generation sessions that actually produce diverse, useful options instead of degenerating into the first plausible answer. Use for product ideation, feature exploration, problem-reframing, naming, design alternatives, strategic option-generation, or any task where the failure mode is "we picked the obvious thing too fast." Covers solo and group sessions, divergence/convergence discipline, technique selection (SCAMPER, Crazy Eights, How Might We, 6-3-5 Brainwriting, Reverse Brainstorming, Worst Possible Idea, Random Stimulus), facilitation moves for handling dominant voices and groupthink, and structured convergence to a shortlist with rationale. Outputs a session artifact with options generated, evaluation, shortlist, and the rejected-but-interesting list.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design discovery, directories, and guilds for agent swarms at scale. Use when agents need to find each other on a shared surface: capability indices, yellow-pages directories, whois/phonebook routing, reputation-aware discovery, and guild structures that scope trust. Covers the canonical prior art (FIPA Directory Facilitator, Contract Net, Chord/DHT, DNS-SD/Consul, EigenTrust, Greif's merchant guilds) and the failure modes (read-poverty, Sybil reset, Goodhart on rank, directory staleness, cold-start). Triggers: "agents can't find each other", "who owns this file/skill", "route a question to the right agent", "capability registry", "agent reputation", "guild / federation of fleets". NOT for issuing identities, granting authority, or automatically assigning work from a directory entry.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs and verifies fail-closed continuation of a living durable agent after its VM, process, provider session, backend, or context window disappears. Use for body leases, generation fencing, cold-birth failure, process GC, native resume, cross-harness rebodiment, resurrection capsules, capability translation, ambiguous-effect reconciliation, and capacity-aware handoff. NOT for reviving an intentionally retired identity, generic disaster recovery, copying credentials or raw transcripts, ordinary process restart, or claiming metaphysical continuity.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Recommend, create, preview, and attach Coval trace-based metrics from OpenTelemetry spans. Use when a user has Coval traces and wants custom trace metrics, trace-aware LLM judge metrics with include_traces, latency, token usage, provider failures, tool behavior, vertical-specific workflow signals, or production monitoring based on trace attributes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn a large dataset (an existing oversized Coval test set, an export of past conversations, or a CSV/JSON of cases) into a small, high-signal Coval test set by removing duplicates, identifying unique scenarios, and selecting a representative, failure-weighted subset — then bulk-loading it with no row cap. Use when the user says "I have thousands of cases", "dedupe my test set", "my test set is too big", "turn this dataset into a test set", "pick representative scenarios", or "my CSV import only kept 10 / uploaded everything".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build a compact Coval test set from product requirements, observed conversation failures or a coverage gap. Design realistic scenarios with separate expected behaviors, provenance and controlled voice/persona variation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Doctrine for fixing TypeScript errors against generated types (database.types.ts, api-types.ts). Use when fixing tsc or type-check failures or a type-errors batch, writing supabase .rpc()/.from() calls or DB shape guards, errors mention Json/unknown/Database, or you are tempted to cast or suppress.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
next/dynamic code splitting and build-graph cost; first stop for build failures. Use before lazy-loading or deferring a heavy component, adding a dynamic import, React.lazy, or ssr: false; on 'window is not defined' or a hydration mismatch; shrinking the bundle; or on 'build failed', OOM, SIGKILL, a slower build, or 'Collecting page data'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Diagnostic method for any bug, failure, regression, flake, or slowdown. Use before proposing a fix: something is broken, throwing, not saving, not showing, or 'worked yesterday'; on 'debug this' or 'find the root cause'; and immediately after a fix attempt did not work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create an Agent SKILL.md fallback for an existing find-XXXX finder that relies on a fragile discovery foundation — above all LLM_DECOMPILE (patterns C/D/E), which matches the decompiled shape of a predecessor function against a stored reference and breaks when a symbol is inlined or de-inlined in a way the reference does not cover. The generated fallback coexists with the preprocessor and runs only when it returns failure, recovering every target robustly by decompiling the predecessor and following the inline/de-inline boundary with semantic anchors. Use when a finder broke on a game update, or you want to durably backstop one before it does. The recipe generalizes to any finder foundation. Triggers: create agent skill fallback, add SKILL.md fallback, robust fallback for finder, backstop LLM_DECOMPILE finder, final guarantee skill
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write content in David Dias's authentic voice. Use when Quill or any agent needs to create tweets, blog posts, emails, marketing copy, or any content that should sound like David wrote it. David's voice is personal and conversational, mixing professional insight with personal anecdotes. He shares failures openly, values community, and speaks directly to readers with honesty and warmth. Not corporate or overly polished.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "sandboxの互換性をチェックして", "sandbox設定を確認して", "このプロジェクトでsandboxが使えるか調べて", "sandboxでコマンドが失敗する", "check sandbox compatibility", "verify sandbox settings", "sandbox is blocking my commands", or wants to ensure their development workflow works within Claude Code's sandbox restrictions — either proactively before starting work or reactively after encountering sandbox-related failures.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a Spark implementation needs an evidence-based review for correctness, ownership, compatibility, failure handling, maintainability, and unnecessary complexity.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs, hardens and audits the system around an agent that runs on its own — bot, scheduled task, routine, automation — all but the prompt text. Trigger for guardrails, kill switches, cadence and loop pacing (cron, wake, /loop), retries and failures, output contracts, protected resources, handoffs between agents, or isolating untrusted email and web content; to emit a spec as a Cowork task, routine, scheduled task or CI job; or say agentwright (emit, audit, refresh); it never schedules or runs one. Prompt text is promptwright's; CLAUDE.md, rigwright's; skills, skillwright's; runtime grants and credentials, gatewarden's scan; code threats, a security harness's.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.