Headcount and delivery-capacity planning — effective capacity from raw headcount, hire/contract/defer scenarios, and capacity-vs-commitment gap reports. Use when planning a quarter, sizing a hiring ask, or testing whether a roadmap fits.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
borghei/Claude-Skills☆ 9542026년 10월 7일 업데이트
Systematic competitor tracking that feeds positioning, battlecards, and roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building battlecards, tracking market moves, conducting win/loss analysis, or updating positioning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
borghei/Claude-Skills☆ 9542026년 10월 7일 업데이트
Build a 12-month SEO plan that scores four pillars and phases the roadmap. "build an SEO strategy"
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro☆ 8982026년 10월 12일 업데이트
Use when the user has nothing — no traces, no labels, no eval set — and needs to build a v0 evaluation from scratch. Also use when the user says "I need to start evaluating my app but don't know where to begin," "I want to set up eval for a new product," or has just identified failure modes and needs to turn them into principles. Outputs a v0 grader in 30 minutes using OpenJudge SimpleRubricsGenerator, plus a roadmap to reach calibrated evaluation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
agentscope-ai/OpenJudge☆ 8812026년 9월 11일 업데이트
Use when the user has a judge/grader and human-labeled data, and wants to measure how well the judge agrees with humans, detect systematic biases, determine whether automatic evaluation can replace human review, or build a human-reduction roadmap. Also use when the user mentions calibration, TPR/TNR, judge validation, inter-rater agreement, Cohen's kappa, bias detection, or "is my automatic evaluation trustworthy." Merges the calibrate and align functions into one skill.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
agentscope-ai/OpenJudge☆ 8812026년 9월 11일 업데이트
Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills☆ 8802026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Classify AI systems under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and determine compliance obligations. Use when asked to assess AI risk level, check if an AI system is prohibited, determine high-risk status, identify GPAI model obligations, map provider/deployer responsibilities, or build an AI Act compliance roadmap. Covers the full classification decision tree (Prohibited → High-Risk → Limited → Minimal → GPAI), obligations by role (provider, deployer, importer, distributor), compliance timelines, and DACH-specific considerations (German works council, BaFin, BSI, BNetzA). Triggers on phrases like "classify this AI system", "is this high-risk under the AI Act", "AI Act risk assessment", "EU AI Act compliance", "prohibited AI practice", "GPAI obligations", "AI Act timeline".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills☆ 8802026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Assess and operationalize implementation readiness for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act Annex III, including provider and deployer obligations, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration. Use when users say things like “we classified this as high-risk, what now?”, “build an EU AI Act readiness plan”, “assess our Annex III compliance gaps”, “what do providers/deployers of high-risk AI need to implement?”, “prepare for conformity assessment”, or “create a high-risk AI implementation roadmap.”
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills☆ 8802026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Expert India Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about the DPDPA, DPDP Act, DPDP Rules 2025, India data privacy law, Data Fiduciary obligations, Data Principal rights, Significant Data Fiduciary, Data Protection Board of India, consent under DPDPA, notice requirements, breach notification India, children's data India, cross-border data transfer India, India privacy compliance, DPDPA gap analysis, DPDPA vs GDPR, or any obligation under India's personal data protection framework. Also trigger for: "Section 6 consent", "Section 7 legitimate uses", "Section 9 children's data", "Section 10 SDF", "Section 16 cross-border", "Rule 6 breach notification", "Rule 13 SDF obligations", "Data Protection Board complaint", "verifiable parental consent India", "DPDPA compliance roadmap", or "India privacy law global company".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills☆ 8802026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills☆ 8802026년 10월 20일 업데이트
When the user needs a comprehensive marketing plan for a client, a company they advise, or their own product. Also use when the user mentions "marketing plan," "growth plan," "GTM plan," "go-to-market plan," "AARRR plan," "90-day marketing plan," "12-month marketing roadmap," "fractional CMO plan," or "fCMO plan." Generates an exhaustive 13-section plan structured by AARRR (Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Referral, Revenue), customized to the client's current budget, team, and stage, mapped to future funding milestones, cross-referenced with the 139-idea marketing-ideas library and an embedded 17-section current-state audit rubric, with a full marketing operations stack showing which skills and MCP/API integrations execute each part. Outputs a Notion-paste-ready markdown document. For positioning and ICP context before planning, see product-marketing. For stage-specific deep work, see onboarding, signup, emails, referrals, pricing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Nexus-JPF/note-companion☆ 8722026년 10월 18일 업데이트
When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," "content planning," "editorial calendar," "content marketing," "content roadmap," "what content should I create," "blog topics," "content pillars," or "I don't know what to write." Use this whenever someone needs help deciding what content to produce, not just writing it. For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit. For social media content specifically, see social.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Nexus-JPF/note-companion☆ 8722026년 10월 18일 업데이트
Create an SEO strategy and implementation roadmap around business goals, available evidence and resources. Use for SEO planning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AgriciDaniel/chatgpt-seo☆ 8412026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Use after a phase has been discussed, or when the user asks for a PLAN.md for a roadmap phase. Researches, spawns gsd-planner, verifies with gsd-plan-checker, and iterates; supports --gaps, --prd, --skip-research.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
coco-research/coco☆ 8172026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Use when a milestone audit reported gaps and you want the fix phases created in one pass. Reads MILESTONE-AUDIT.md, groups gaps into phases, adds them to ROADMAP.md and offers to plan each one.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
coco-research/coco☆ 8172026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Use when every phase in a milestone is complete and the user wants to archive it, tag the release, and start the next version. Archives roadmap and requirements to .planning/milestones/, updates PROJECT.md, then tags the version.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
coco-research/coco☆ 8172026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Use when a planned but unstarted phase should come off the roadmap. Removes the phase, renumbers the phases after it into a clean sequence, and commits the change as the historical record.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
coco-research/coco☆ 8172026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Use to keep moving without inspecting progress, or when the user asks what is next in the GSD workflow. Reads STATE.md, ROADMAP.md and phase dirs to invoke the next step; --force skips safety and verification gates.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
coco-research/coco☆ 8172026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Use before /gsd-manager to fill in missing Depends on fields in ROADMAP.md. Analyzes file overlap, semantic dependencies and data flow between phases, then suggests dependency updates to confirm.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
coco-research/coco☆ 8172026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Use when onboarding someone to a finished milestone or preparing a team review. Reads ROADMAP, REQUIREMENTS, CONTEXT, SUMMARY, and VERIFICATION artifacts into one MILESTONE_SUMMARY in .planning/reports/, then offers Q&A.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
coco-research/coco☆ 8172026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Use when urgent work surfaces mid-milestone and must land between two planned phases without renumbering the roadmap. Inserts it as a decimal phase such as 72.1 after the phase the user names.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
coco-research/coco☆ 8172026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Use when the current milestone has shipped and it is time to scope the next one, or when the user asks to start a new milestone. Updates PROJECT.md, then runs questioning, research, requirements, and roadmap.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
coco-research/coco☆ 8172026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Use when the user wants to park an idea or feature request that is not ready for active planning, or says add it to the backlog. Writes a 999.x entry to ROADMAP.md and creates its phase directory for later promotion.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
coco-research/coco☆ 8172026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Generates detailed implementation guide with pseudo-code and step-by-step development instructions. Creates IMPLEMENTATION_GUIDE.md from PRD, Architecture, and UX specs. Use when creating development roadmap.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills☆ 8142026년 7월 24일 업데이트