3.3천건 · 관련도순
Framework for computational fluid dynamics simulations using Python. Use when running fluid dynamics simulations including Navier-Stokes equations (2D/3D), shallow water equations, stratified flows, or when analyzing turbulence, vortex dynamics, or geophysical flows. Provides pseudospectral methods with FFT, HPC support, and comprehensive output analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Control LLM output with regex and grammars, guarantee valid JSON/XML/code generation, enforce structured formats, and build multi-step workflows with Guidance - Microsoft Research's constrained generation framework
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Framework for building LLM-powered applications with agents, chains, and RAG. Supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), 500+ integrations, ReAct agents, tool calling, memory management, and vector store retrieval. Use for building chatbots, question-answering systems, autonomous agents, or RAG applications. Best for rapid prototyping and production deployments.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build complex AI systems with declarative programming, optimize prompts automatically, create modular RAG systems and agents with DSPy - Stanford NLP's framework for systematic LM programming
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Process-based discrete-event simulation framework in Python. Use this skill when building simulations of systems with processes, queues, resources, and time-based events such as manufacturing systems, service operations, network traffic, logistics, or any system where entities interact with shared resources over time.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new scientific tools for ToolUniverse framework with proper structure, validation, and testing. Use when users need to add tools to ToolUniverse, implement new API integrations, create tool wrappers for scientific databases/services, expand ToolUniverse capabilities, or follow ToolUniverse contribution guidelines. Supports creating tool classes, JSON configurations, validation, error handling, and test examples.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Fix failing ToolUniverse tools by diagnosing test failures, identifying root causes, implementing fixes, and validating solutions. Use when ToolUniverse tools fail tests, return errors, have schema validation issues, or when asked to debug or fix tools in the ToolUniverse framework.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-objective optimization framework. NSGA-II, NSGA-III, MOEA/D, Pareto fronts, constraint handling, benchmarks (ZDT, DTLZ), for engineering design and optimization problems.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes chemical libraries by scaffold using Bemis-Murcko scaffolds, generic frameworks, cyclic skeletons, matched molecular pair (MMP) analysis via mmpdb, R-group decomposition, Free-Wilson analysis, scaffold hopping, and chemotype-aware ML train/test splits. Use when identifying chemotype clusters in a library, deriving SAR transformation rules, decomposing series into R-groups, performing scaffold-balanced QSAR splits, or planning analog campaigns.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Gather and persist audience, brand, UX goals, React framework, Tailwind setup, and component defaults for future design work. Use when the user asks to establish or update reusable project design guidance. A request to build UI can proceed with existing context without running setup.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit AI systems for bias with testing frameworks and mitigation strategies. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-bias-auditor related tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
React Router v8 (RR8、旧 Remix) の Framework / Data / Declarative Mode リファレンス。 loader, action, middleware, routes.ts, shouldRevalidate、createBrowserRouter, RouterProvider, BrowserRouter、 hooks (useLoaderData, useActionData, useFetcher, useNavigate, useNavigation, useParams, useSearchParams)、 Form, Link, NavLink, Outlet, Route, Routes, Await、SSR / SPA / Static / RSC、ErrorBoundary, redirect, defer (v7 で削除), session, matchPath, matchRoutes, type-safe routing。 TanStack Router (@tanstack/react-router) とは別ライブラリ。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Echo (LabStack) v5 — Go Web framework リファレンス。routing（Group）、echo.Context、 Bind、Validator、HTTPError、HTTPErrorHandler、RFC 9457 Problem Details、 middleware（JWT, CORS, CSRF, BasicAuth, Gzip, Recover, Logger, RateLimiter）、 OpenTelemetry (echo-otel)、IPExtractor、SchemeExtractor、Renderer、WebSocket、SSE、 AutoTLS 実装例。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when preparing Australian draft financial statements and a framework-specific disclosure checklist from a final trial balance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Web Performance Engineering — analyzes Core Web Vitals using the PageSpeed Insights API (PSI v5) and applies the 80/20 principle: identify the 20% of changes that produce 80% of the performance gain. Produces a prioritized markdown report with quantified estimates and framework-specific code. Trigger: When auditing page speed, analyzing Core Web Vitals, or optimizing web performance for any URL.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when building PHP applications with modern PHP 8.3+ features, Laravel, or Symfony frameworks. Invokes strict typing, PHPStan level 9, async patterns with Swoole, and PSR standards. Creates controllers, configures middleware, generates migrations, writes PHPUnit/Pest tests, defines typed DTOs and value objects, sets up dependency injection, and scaffolds REST/GraphQL APIs. Use when working with Eloquent, Doctrine, Composer, Psalm, ReactPHP, or any PHP API development.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design, implement, review, and audit Android Jetpack Compose UI/UX for phone interfaces. Use when a request concerns concrete Compose layout, components, interaction, accessibility, or visual behavior. Do not activate for framework or dependency presence alone; non-UI Android work is excluded.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Work on the dashboard's frontend — the vanilla JS/CSS page with no framework or bundler. Use this whenever a task touches `static/nowplaying.js`, `static/style.css`, the Jinja templates (`templates/nowplaying.html`, `_icons.html`), the accent-color tinting, the karaoke lyrics sync, the now-playing poll, or the empty-state mosaic / recent-plays pile. Covers how the page is wired, how it reads i18n and data from the server, the ESLint gate, and the Android bridge, so changes match the existing patterns.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs differential expression on bulk RNA-seq count data with edgeR's negative-binomial GLM and quasi-likelihood F-test framework. Covers DGEList construction, filterByExpr, TMM/TMMwsp normalization, robust dispersion estimation, glmQLFit/glmQLFTest, TREAT for magnitude-bounded hypotheses, contrasts via no-intercept designs, voom and voomWithQualityWeights for heterogeneous samples, and the edgeR v4 bias-corrected APL changes. Use when running bulk DE with edgeR, choosing edgeR over DESeq2 (small n, transcript DE via catchSalmon, large samples), needing TREAT for a fold-change-threshold hypothesis, troubleshooting v3-to-v4 reproducibility, building paired or interaction designs, or handling library-quality heterogeneity.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Delimits putative species boundaries from molecular data within the de Queiroz 2007 unified-lineage framework using ASAP (Puillandre 2021 successor to ABGD), mPTP C++ (Kapli 2017 successor to bPTP; bPTP is Python NOT R), GMYC single/multi-threshold (Pons 2006; Fujisawa 2013), multilocus BPP v4 with prior calibration from data (NOT defaults; Yang 2015), SNAPP + BFD* for SNP delimitation, DELINEATE (Sukumaran 2021) speciation-process modeling to address Sukumaran & Knowles 2017 PNAS critique that MSC delimits structure not species, integrative-taxonomy congruence (Padial 2010; Carstens 2013), Dsuite for introgression testing before sister claims (Malinsky 2021), and Meyer & Paulay 2005 barcoding-gap-absence caveat. Use when delineating species from DNA barcoding data, resolving cryptic complexes, choosing among ASAP/mPTP/BPP/DELINEATE, calibrating BPP priors, distinguishing introgression from ILS, or applying the Sukumaran-Knowles oversplitting correction.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes single-cell pooled CRISPR screens (Perturb-seq, CROP-seq, Perturb-CITE-seq, ECCITE-seq, multiome) where each cell carries an sgRNA and a scRNA-seq / surface-protein / chromatin readout. Covers experimental design (direct-capture Perturb-seq Dixit 2016 vs CROP-seq 3'UTR-barcoded Datlinger 2017 vs ECCITE-seq vs Multiome), MOI for sgRNA assignment, escaper-cell filtering (Mixscape, Papalexi 2021), SCEPTRE NB GLM + permutation for low-MOI (Barry 2024 Genome Biol 25:124), the Pertpy framework, factor decomposition, genome-scale Perturb-seq (Replogle 2022 Cell, 2.5M cells), and per-perturbation single-cell DE. Use when running a single-cell CRISPR screen, choosing direct-capture vs CROP-seq architecture, filtering escaper cells, performing single-cell DE, integrating Perturb-seq with pathway analysis, scaling to GW CRISPRi via Replogle protocol, or analyzing multi-omics screens.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prioritizes rare-disease variants from trio/quad WES/WGS with de novo (DeNovoGear, Triodenovo), compound-heterozygous phasing (WhatsHap), mosaic VAF tiering, phenotype-driven ranking (Exomiser, Phen2Gene, AMELIE), ClinGen gene-disease validity gating, and ACMG SF v3.2 secondary findings reporting. Use when running diagnostic exome / genome pipelines, identifying candidate Mendelian disease genes, screening for incidental findings, or auditing VUS reclassification cycles. The ACMG/AMP classification framework (PVS1 decision tree, Pejaver PP3/BP4 calibration, Tavtigian point system) is in clinical-databases/acmg-classification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs subgroup and heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) analyses for clinical trials. Covers Mantel-Haenszel pooling, Breslow-Day, interaction tests in regression, RERI for additive interaction, modern data-adaptive HTE methods (STEPP, SIDES, causal forests, X/R-learners), Bayesian shrinkage (Dixon-Simon, MAP, EXNEX), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), and credibility frameworks (Sun BMJ, EMA 2019). Use when analyzing treatment effects across patient subgroups for regulatory submissions or precision-medicine claims.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Classify constitutional (germline) copy number variants for clinical reporting using the 2019 ACMG/ClinGen technical standards points-based framework, with ClassifyCNV and AnnotSV for semi-automated scoring. Covers the separate copy-number-loss and copy-number-gain rubrics, the five-tier classification, ClinGen haploinsufficiency/triplosensitivity and dosage-sensitive regions, de novo and segregation evidence, and population-frequency benign evidence. Use when assigning pathogenic/likely-pathogenic/VUS/likely-benign/benign to a constitutional CNV, scoring a CNV against ACMG/ClinGen criteria, or distinguishing the automatable evidence from the case-specific evidence requiring manual input.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.