321건 · 관련도순
Organic chemistry reasoning guide for reaction product prediction, mechanism analysis (electrophilic/nucleophilic substitution, addition, elimination, pericyclic, radical), and spectroscopy interpretation (1H/13C NMR, IR, MS). Reasons from first principles (electron flow, kinetic vs thermodynamic) rather than pattern-matching named reactions. Use for organic synthesis problems and mechanism explanations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze metabolomics data end-to-end — metabolite identification, quantification (TIC normalization, batch correction), differential analysis, and pathway interpretation. Use for processing mass-spec metabolomics output, normalization choice, untargeted metabolomics workflows, and integrating with other omics layers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Interpretable ADMET analysis with mechanistic reasoning. Maps liabilities to structural causes and biological pathways. Based on CoTox (Park 2025) and DrugR (Liu 2026).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Decision-grade statistical analysis for metabolomics intensity tables. Covers transformation and scaling (Pareto vs unit-variance as a hidden hypothesis), unsupervised structure (PCA/HCA for QC), permutation-validated PLS-DA/OPLS-DA (R2 vs Q2, double CV, VIP as heuristic), univariate testing (Welch/Mann-Whitney/ANOVA/LMM with covariate adjustment), and dependence-aware multiple testing. Use when testing which metabolites differ, building or validating a discriminant model, choosing a scaling, or correcting many correlated tests. For sample-wise normalization/drift correction see metabolomics/normalization-qc; for ML classifiers and selection-inside-CV leakage see machine-learning/biomarker-discovery and machine-learning/model-validation; for pathway interpretation see metabolomics/pathway-mapping; for design/power/multiplicity regime see experimental-design/multiple-testing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Creates DE-specific diagnostic and result visualizations using DESeq2/edgeR built-in functions and lightweight ggplot2 wrappers. Covers MA plot (with the shrunken-LFC compression effect), volcano (with the apeglm caveat that p-values are unchanged), PCA on VST/rlog (never raw counts), sample distance heatmaps, top-DE-gene heatmaps with the row-scaling trap, dispersion / BCV plot interpretation, p-value histogram diagnostics, plotCounts for individual genes, blind=TRUE vs FALSE rationale, and the n=3 visualization stake. Use when generating DE diagnostic plots, choosing VST vs rlog for visualization, troubleshooting suspicious plot patterns (shifted MA cloud, batch-dominated PCA, anti-conservative p-value histogram), or building a standard QC figure panel.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-sequencing (ONT DRS) signal data using m6Anet (Hendra 2022 *Nat Methods* 19:1590; multiple-instance-learning neural network over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the required upstream pipeline (Dorado / Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 transcriptome alignment with `-ax map-ont -uf -k14 --secondary=no` -> nanopolish eventalign with `--scale-events --signal-index` (m6Anet-required) plus `--summary` / `--threads` housekeeping -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability interpretation including the `mod_ratio` per-site stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only modeling constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads per site for stable probability estimates), multi-condition comparison via xPore (Pratanwanich 2021 *Nat Biotechnol* 39:1394), Nanocompore (Leger 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:7198), ELIGOS (Jenjaroenpun 2021 *NAR* 49:e7), and Dorado native modification calling (RNA004 chemistry, 2024+), reference-transcriptome version pinning, the cDNA-vs-DRS chemistry distinction (cDNA-Nanopore CANNOT be used for modification detection), and orthogonal validation against MeRIP / GLORI. Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting per-site `probability_modified` vs `mod_ratio` vs per-read modification probabilities, comparing methylation between conditions from ONT data, deciding between m6Anet for known DRACH sites and Dorado/Remora for genome-wide screening, pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller model versions, or troubleshooting eventalign / dataprep failures.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Runs JACKS (Joint Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Screens; Allen et al 2019 Genome Research) which models per-sgRNA log-fold-change as the product of a treatment-dependent gene-essentiality term and a treatment-independent guide-efficacy term. Covers the Bayesian decomposition math, the hierarchical efficacy prior shared across screens performed with the same library, when JACKS outperforms MAGeCK (multi-screen joint analysis, libraries with broad efficacy variance) and when it does not (single screen, novel libraries with no prior efficacy), library-reuse efficacy transfer, downstream essentiality interpretation, and the 2.5x sample-size reduction enabled by efficacy-aware testing. Use when running multiple screens with the same library, when guide-level noise is suspected to dominate per-gene signal, when reusing published essentiality reference screens for efficacy priors, or when comparing screens performed across cell lines that share library but differ biologically.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs and analyzes combinatorial CRISPR screens covering paired-Cas9 (Big Papi, Najm 2018), enhanced AsCas12a multiplex (enCas12a, DeWeirdt 2021), in4mer 4-guide-array Cas12a (Esmaeili Anvar N et al 2024 Nat Commun 15:3577) and the Inzolia paralog-pair library, paralog-buffering detection (Dede 2020 Genome Biol; Thompson 2021 Cell Reports 36:109597), genetic-interaction (GI) scoring as observed_double_LFC minus expected_additive_double_LFC, synthetic-lethal and synthetic-rescue interaction interpretation, the half-of-essentiality buffered by paralogs phenomenon, multiplex screen statistical analysis with MAGeCK MLE interaction terms, and the relationship to single-cell combinatorial Perturb-seq. Use when designing a paralog or pathway-pair screen, choosing between paired-Cas9 (Big Papi) and Cas12a multiplex (Inzolia), interpreting genetic interaction scores, identifying synthetic-lethal targets for drug development, or scaling beyond single-gene CRISPR screens.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes base-editing screens for variant function. Covers library design (Sanson 2020 GRACE, Hanna 2021 BRCA1/2 SNV scanning, Cuella-Martin 2021), CBE vs ABE chemistry choice (BE3/BE4 vs ABE7.10/ABE8.20/ABE8e), editing-window math (positions 4-8 from PAM-distal end, wider for ABE8e), bystander-edit quantification and the variant-call ambiguity it creates, sgRNA-efficiency filtering before hit calling, indel byproduct interpretation, the substitution-vs-indel diagnostic, variant annotation against ClinVar / COSMIC, and the Broad be-validation-pipeline. Use when designing a BE variant screen, choosing CBE vs ABE for a specific edit, interpreting bystander-confounded hits, distinguishing functional signal from indel artifact, integrating CRISPResso2 output with screen scoring, or deciding BE vs PE for SNV installation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Classify constitutional (germline) copy number variants for clinical reporting using the 2019 ACMG/ClinGen technical standards points-based framework, with ClassifyCNV and AnnotSV for semi-automated scoring. Covers the separate copy-number-loss and copy-number-gain rubrics, the five-tier classification, ClinGen haploinsufficiency/triplosensitivity and dosage-sensitive regions, de novo and segregation evidence, and population-frequency benign evidence. Use when assigning pathogenic/likely-pathogenic/VUS/likely-benign/benign to a constitutional CNV, scoring a CNV against ACMG/ClinGen criteria, or distinguishing the automatable evidence from the case-specific evidence requiring manual input.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Predict RBP binding from RNA sequence using deep learning models (RBPNet sequence-to-signal, RNAProt RNN, GraphProt2 GCN with structure, DeepCLIP, DeepRiPe multi-modal CNN) for variant-effect prediction, in silico binding-site discovery, model interpretation, and transfer learning from CLIP and RBNS datasets. Use when computational prediction of RBP binding from sequence is needed, evaluating variant effects on binding without further wet-lab experiments, comparing model performance, or training a custom model on ENCODE eCLIP data.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Queries gnomAD v4 (807k samples), v3, v2.1.1, and constraint metrics with grpmax FAF95, bottleneck-group exclusion, LOEUF interpretation, SV/CNV/mtDNA catalogs, and Whiffin max-credible-AF framework. Use when filtering rare variants, applying ACMG BS1/BA1, ranking genes by LoF intolerance, or selecting between v2 (GRCh37 + chrX/Y constraint) and v4 (GRCh38 + 807k samples).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Predicts whether a DNA variant alters mRNA splicing using sequence-based deep-learning tools — SpliceAI (10kb context dilated CNN, clinical default), Pangolin (multi-tissue), MMSplice (modular per-region CNN with calibrated ΔPSI), SpliceTransformer/TrASPr (tissue-aware transformers), SpliceVault (empirical 300K-RNA lookup of likely mis-splicing outcomes), CADD-Splice (composite score). Applies the ClinGen SVI 2023 framework for ACMG/AMP variant interpretation (PVS1, PP3, BP4 evidence codes), HGVS splicing nomenclature (c.123+1G>A, c.123-3T>G, r.spl?), extended-window scoring for deep-intronic pseudoexons, tissue-specific predictions, branchpoint variant detection (BPHunter, LaBranchoR), and splice-switching ASO design. Use when interpreting splice impact of clinical variants, prioritizing VUS, identifying deep-intronic pathogenic variants, or designing ASOs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-sequencing (ONT DRS) signal data using m6Anet (Hendra 2022 *Nat Methods* 19:1590; multiple-instance-learning neural network over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the required upstream pipeline (Dorado / Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 transcriptome alignment with `-ax map-ont -uf -k14 --secondary=no` -> nanopolish eventalign with `--scale-events --signal-index` (m6Anet-required) plus `--summary` / `--threads` housekeeping -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability interpretation including the `mod_ratio` per-site stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only modeling constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads per site for stable probability estimates), multi-condition comparison via xPore (Pratanwanich 2021 *Nat Biotechnol* 39:1394), Nanocompore (Leger 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:7198), ELIGOS (Jenjaroenpun 2021 *NAR* 49:e7), and Dorado native modification calling (RNA004 chemistry, 2024+), reference-transcriptome version pinning, the cDNA-vs-DRS chemistry distinction (cDNA-Nanopore CANNOT be used for modification detection), and orthogonal validation against MeRIP / GLORI. Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting per-site `probability_modified` vs `mod_ratio` vs per-read modification probabilities, comparing methylation between conditions from ONT data, deciding between m6Anet for known DRACH sites and Dorado/Remora for genome-wide screening, pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller model versions, or troubleshooting eventalign / dataprep failures.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Creates DE-specific diagnostic and result visualizations using DESeq2/edgeR built-in functions and lightweight ggplot2 wrappers. Covers MA plot (with the shrunken-LFC compression effect), volcano (with the apeglm caveat that p-values are unchanged), PCA on VST/rlog (never raw counts), sample distance heatmaps, top-DE-gene heatmaps with the row-scaling trap, dispersion / BCV plot interpretation, p-value histogram diagnostics, plotCounts for individual genes, blind=TRUE vs FALSE rationale, and the n=3 visualization stake. Use when generating DE diagnostic plots, choosing VST vs rlog for visualization, troubleshooting suspicious plot patterns (shifted MA cloud, batch-dominated PCA, anti-conservative p-value histogram), or building a standard QC figure panel.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes base-editing screens for variant function. Covers library design (Sanson 2020 GRACE, Hanna 2021 BRCA1/2 SNV scanning, Cuella-Martin 2021), CBE vs ABE chemistry choice (BE3/BE4 vs ABE7.10/ABE8.20/ABE8e), editing-window math (positions 4-8 from PAM-distal end, wider for ABE8e), bystander-edit quantification and the variant-call ambiguity it creates, sgRNA-efficiency filtering before hit calling, indel byproduct interpretation, the substitution-vs-indel diagnostic, variant annotation against ClinVar / COSMIC, and the Broad be-validation-pipeline. Use when designing a BE variant screen, choosing CBE vs ABE for a specific edit, interpreting bystander-confounded hits, distinguishing functional signal from indel artifact, integrating CRISPResso2 output with screen scoring, or deciding BE vs PE for SNV installation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Runs JACKS (Joint Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Screens; Allen et al 2019 Genome Research) which models per-sgRNA log-fold-change as the product of a treatment-dependent gene-essentiality term and a treatment-independent guide-efficacy term. Covers the Bayesian decomposition math, the hierarchical efficacy prior shared across screens performed with the same library, when JACKS outperforms MAGeCK (multi-screen joint analysis, libraries with broad efficacy variance) and when it does not (single screen, novel libraries with no prior efficacy), library-reuse efficacy transfer, downstream essentiality interpretation, and the 2.5x sample-size reduction enabled by efficacy-aware testing. Use when running multiple screens with the same library, when guide-level noise is suspected to dominate per-gene signal, when reusing published essentiality reference screens for efficacy priors, or when comparing screens performed across cell lines that share library but differ biologically.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs and analyzes combinatorial CRISPR screens covering paired-Cas9 (Big Papi, Najm 2018), enhanced AsCas12a multiplex (enCas12a, DeWeirdt 2021), in4mer 4-guide-array Cas12a (Esmaeili Anvar N et al 2024 Nat Commun 15:3577) and the Inzolia paralog-pair library, paralog-buffering detection (Dede 2020 Genome Biol; Thompson 2021 Cell Reports 36:109597), genetic-interaction (GI) scoring as observed_double_LFC minus expected_additive_double_LFC, synthetic-lethal and synthetic-rescue interaction interpretation, the half-of-essentiality buffered by paralogs phenomenon, multiplex screen statistical analysis with MAGeCK MLE interaction terms, and the relationship to single-cell combinatorial Perturb-seq. Use when designing a paralog or pathway-pair screen, choosing between paired-Cas9 (Big Papi) and Cas12a multiplex (Inzolia), interpreting genetic interaction scores, identifying synthetic-lethal targets for drug development, or scaling beyond single-gene CRISPR screens.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Queries gnomAD v4 (807k samples), v3, v2.1.1, and constraint metrics with grpmax FAF95, bottleneck-group exclusion, LOEUF interpretation, SV/CNV/mtDNA catalogs, and Whiffin max-credible-AF framework. Use when filtering rare variants, applying ACMG BS1/BA1, ranking genes by LoF intolerance, or selecting between v2 (GRCh37 + chrX/Y constraint) and v4 (GRCh38 + 807k samples).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Predict RBP binding from RNA sequence using deep learning models (RBPNet sequence-to-signal, RNAProt RNN, GraphProt2 GCN with structure, DeepCLIP, DeepRiPe multi-modal CNN) for variant-effect prediction, in silico binding-site discovery, model interpretation, and transfer learning from CLIP and RBNS datasets. Use when computational prediction of RBP binding from sequence is needed, evaluating variant effects on binding without further wet-lab experiments, comparing model performance, or training a custom model on ENCODE eCLIP data.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Classify constitutional (germline) copy number variants for clinical reporting using the 2019 ACMG/ClinGen technical standards points-based framework, with ClassifyCNV and AnnotSV for semi-automated scoring. Covers the separate copy-number-loss and copy-number-gain rubrics, the five-tier classification, ClinGen haploinsufficiency/triplosensitivity and dosage-sensitive regions, de novo and segregation evidence, and population-frequency benign evidence. Use when assigning pathogenic/likely-pathogenic/VUS/likely-benign/benign to a constitutional CNV, scoring a CNV against ACMG/ClinGen criteria, or distinguishing the automatable evidence from the case-specific evidence requiring manual input.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Predicts whether a DNA variant alters mRNA splicing using sequence-based deep-learning tools — SpliceAI (10kb context dilated CNN, clinical default), Pangolin (multi-tissue), MMSplice (modular per-region CNN with calibrated ΔPSI), SpliceTransformer/TrASPr (tissue-aware transformers), SpliceVault (empirical 300K-RNA lookup of likely mis-splicing outcomes), CADD-Splice (composite score). Applies the ClinGen SVI 2023 framework for ACMG/AMP variant interpretation (PVS1, PP3, BP4 evidence codes), HGVS splicing nomenclature (c.123+1G>A, c.123-3T>G, r.spl?), extended-window scoring for deep-intronic pseudoexons, tissue-specific predictions, branchpoint variant detection (BPHunter, LaBranchoR), and splice-switching ASO design. Use when interpreting splice impact of clinical variants, prioritizing VUS, identifying deep-intronic pathogenic variants, or designing ASOs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.