'phases' 검색 결과

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze Swift and mixed-language compile hotspots using build timing summaries and Swift frontend diagnostics, then produce a recommend-first source-level optimization plan. Use when a developer reports slow compilation, type-checking warnings, expensive clean-build compile phases, long CompileSwiftSources tasks, warn-long-function-bodies output, or wants to speed up Swift type checking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit Xcode project configuration, build settings, scheme behavior, and script phases to find build-time improvements with explicit approval gates. Use when a developer wants project-level build analysis, slow incremental builds, guidance on target dependencies, build settings review, run script phase analysis, parallelization improvements, or module-map and DEFINES_MODULE configuration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Red team tactics principles based on MITRE ATT&CK. Attack phases, detection evasion, reporting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and MITRE ATT&CK ransomware techniques.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds a structured ransomware incident response playbook aligned with the CISA StopRansomware Guide and NIST Cybersecurity Framework. Covers preparation, detection, containment, eradication, recovery, and post-incident phases with actionable checklists. Activates for requests involving ransomware response planning, CISA compliance, incident response playbook creation, or ransomware preparedness assessment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

TOP PRIORITY skill — find and immediately fix or remove every piece of wrong, outdated, or redundant information in ToolUniverse docs. Wrong code, broken links, incorrect counts, and overlapping instructions must be fixed or removed — never left in place. Runs five phases: (D) static method scan, (C) live code execution, (A) automated validation, (B) ToolUniverse audit, (E) less-is-more simplification. Core philosophy: each concept appears exactly once; remove don't add; no emojis; single setup entry point. Use when reviewing docs, before releases, after API changes, or when asked to audit, fix, or simplify documentation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Triage application logs, open GitHub issues, pending feedback, in-app Issues, and agent conversations. Runs five phases: logs → close shipped issues → feedback → in-app issues → agent FAQ gaps. Use when /whats shows pending feedback, checking app logs, cleaning up shipped issues, or working the in-app Issues backlog.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects A/B chromatin compartments from balanced Hi-C contact matrices via eigenvector decomposition of the distance-normalized, Pearson-correlated cis matrix with cooltools (eigs_cis), then orients (phases) the compartment eigenvector against a GC or gene-density track so the active (A) sign is not arbitrary. Covers the eigenvector-is-a-choice problem (per-arm view_df to remove the centromere gradient; picking the eigenvector by max correlation with activity, not by eigenvalue), GC phasing with bioframe.frac_gc, resolution choice (100kb-1Mb), saddle plots and saddle_strength for compartmentalization strength, the cohesin-loss-strengthens-compartments result, subcompartments (SNIPER/Calder/dcHiC), and cross-condition compartment switching. Use when calling A/B compartments, computing E1/eigenvectors, phasing the eigenvector, building saddle plots, choosing a compartment resolution, quantifying compartment strength, or comparing compartmentalization across conditions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or write professional research reports including but not limited to market analysis, consumer insights, brand analysis, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, investment due diligence, or any consulting-grade analytical report. This skill operates in two phases — (1) generating a structured analysis framework with chapter skeleton, data query requirements, and analysis logic, and (2) after data collection by other skills, producing the final consulting-grade report with structured narratives, embedded charts, and strategic insights.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when approved phases should run in parallel — visually in a cmux panel or unattended — when fleet status is requested, or when a fleet member must be stopped or merged

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a product requirement, PRD, or executable roadmap is requested, or when an approved requirement needs decomposing into phases, epics, features and tasks

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Curate durable PWDEV Flow project decisions, lessons, and conventions. Use when the user asks to capture, list, show, link, supersede, or select project memory, or when an approved workflow decision should persist across phases.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT debug directly) when the user reports errors, 500 errors, stack traces, unexpected behavior, "it was working yesterday", or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. (gstack)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Orchestrate the migrate-prep cascade — extract --prep → direct --prep → prototype --prep → assets prep — with confirmation gates between phases. Builds the data structure migrate consumes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or write professional research reports including but not limited to market analysis, consumer insights, brand analysis, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, investment due diligence, or any consulting-grade analytical report. This skill operates in two phases — (1) generating a structured analysis framework with chapter skeleton, data query requirements, and analysis logic, and (2) after data collection by other skills, producing the final consulting-grade report with structured narratives, embedded charts, and strategic insights.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects A/B chromatin compartments from balanced Hi-C contact matrices via eigenvector decomposition of the distance-normalized, Pearson-correlated cis matrix with cooltools (eigs_cis), then orients (phases) the compartment eigenvector against a GC or gene-density track so the active (A) sign is not arbitrary. Covers the eigenvector-is-a-choice problem (per-arm view_df to remove the centromere gradient; picking the eigenvector by max correlation with activity, not by eigenvalue), GC phasing with bioframe.frac_gc, resolution choice (100kb-1Mb), saddle plots and saddle_strength for compartmentalization strength, the cohesin-loss-strengthens-compartments result, subcompartments (SNIPER/Calder/dcHiC), and cross-condition compartment switching. Use when calling A/B compartments, computing E1/eigenvectors, phasing the eigenvector, building saddle plots, choosing a compartment resolution, quantifying compartment strength, or comparing compartmentalization across conditions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a driver has been involved in a crash — regardless of preventability or injury — and the carrier needs to handle the immediate, post-investigation, and return-to-work phases. Covers trauma response, post-accident testing under 49 CFR 382.303, paid time off, retraining, light duty, and re-entry planning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic framework for resurrecting and modernizing legacy codebases through archaeology, resurrection, and rejuvenation phases. Activate on "legacy code", "inherited codebase", "no documentation", "technical debt", "resurrect", "modernize". NOT for greenfield projects or well-documented active codebases.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Suggests manual context compaction at logical intervals to preserve context through task phases rather than arbitrary auto-compaction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Creates and maintains task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md under .kiro/plan/. Use when planning, breaking down work, resuming a multi-step task, tracking phases, or restoring context after compaction. Trigger phrases include start planning, continue task, resume work, current phase, restore context.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates comprehensive, workable unit tests for any programming language using a multi-agent pipeline. Use when asked to generate tests, write unit tests, improve test coverage, add test coverage, create test files, or test a codebase. Supports C#, TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Rust, Java, and more. Orchestrates research, planning, and implementation phases to produce tests that compile, pass, and follow project conventions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.