'ios' 검색 결과

Install Port Daddy's bounded interactive coordination hooks ("tentacles", from the Giant Squid Harness) into the INTERACTIVE sessions of agentic coding CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Antigravity/agy) by auto-detecting which CLIs are installed and writing PER-PROJECT hook config behind a runtime gate, so coordination fires only inside a Port Daddy project while the daemon is running — never machine- wide-always-on. Use when the user says "install port daddy hooks", "agent CLI hooks", "interactive session hooks", "make coordination hooks fire in interactive sessions", "codex/gemini/agy hooks", or "auto-detect agent CLIs". NOT for generic software/package installation; NOT for installing the Port Daddy daemon or `pd` CLI itself (delegate to the `port-daddy` skill / `pd setup`); NOT for MCP server setup (delegate to `pd mcp install`); NOT for authoring new skills (delegate to `skill-architect` / `skill-creator`); NOT for editing the tentacle scripts themselves (owned by the Giant Squid Harness program; this installer layer is pd-adr-090).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Fundamental patterns for effective agentic behavior. Teaches decomposition, tool orchestration, error recovery, context management, quality self-assessment, and knowing when to stop. Model-agnostic principles that make any agent more effective regardless of domain. Activate on: "how should I structure this agent", "agentic workflow", "agent patterns", "multi-step task", "tool orchestration", "/agentic-patterns", "decompose this", "agent best practices", "chain of actions", "when should the agent stop", "agent loop design". NOT for: creating agent infrastructure (use agent-creator), building DAGs (use jury_rig-architect), specific tool implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan, evaluate, and adopt agent infrastructure for a named workload. Use for agent runtime/framework selection, agent evaluation or observability plans, memory and tool boundaries, infrastructure cost controls, and organizational adoption. Covers workload-first comparison, risk and recovery planning, held-out evaluation, cost accounting, and staged rollout. Not a vendor ranking or a production certification. NOT for implementing a specific agent behavior (agentic-patterns), building a specific agent (ai-engineer), prompt optimization (prompt-engineer), or conventional ETL workflow design (jury_rig-architect).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Research AI coding assistant products, audiences, user stories, social proof, hacks, and unmet needs for apps like Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Warp Code, Devin, Windsurf, GitHub Copilot, Cline, Aider, and homegrown agent stacks. Use when designing or positioning agentic developer tools, Port Daddy Agent Harbor, swarm consoles, background coding agents, or competitive/product research for AI software engineering. NOT for implementing the coding agent runtime, generic market research, or UX mockups without developer workflow evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extend and modify the admin dashboard, developer portal, and operations console. Use when adding new admin tabs, metrics, monitoring features, or internal tools. Activates for dashboard development, analytics, user management, and internal tooling.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Frame multi-agent designs through explicit environment, autonomy, information, coordination, commitment, incentive, and verification assumptions. NOT for endorsing multi-agent architecture without need or claiming runtime correctness from conceptual methods.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Time-blind friendly planning, executive function support, and daily structure for ADHD brains. Specializes in realistic time estimation, dopamine-aware task design, and building systems that actually work for neurodivergent minds.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs digital experiences for ADHD brains using neuroscience research and UX principles. Expert in reducing cognitive load, time blindness solutions, dopamine-driven engagement, and compassionate design patterns. Activate on 'ADHD design', 'cognitive load', 'accessibility', 'neurodivergent UX', 'time blindness', 'dopamine-driven', 'executive function'. NOT for general accessibility (WCAG only), neurotypical UX design, or simple UI styling without ADHD context.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert-level idiomatic Rust API design — the patterns that make illegal states unrepresentable and abstractions zero-cost. Type-state programming (PhantomData state machines), newtype + sealed + extension traits, typestate builders, RAII guards & Drop ordering, the interior-mutability decision tree (Cell/RefCell/Mutex/RwLock/Atomic/OnceLock), enum-driven state machines, error architecture (thiserror vs anyhow), dyn vs generic dispatch & object safety, the impl Trait / GAT / RPITIT toolbox, and Deref-for-smart-pointers (and its abuse). Use when designing a Rust library's public API, encoding invariants in the type system, choosing a dispatch or error strategy, or reviewing Rust for idiom. NOT for borrow-checker firefighting / toolchain / test-runner workflow (use rust-development-workflow), NOT for pd-console GPUI rendering/layout/panes (use gpui-rust-console), NOT for app packaging/notarization (use rust-app-distribution).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design or review a declared control-command profile and its verb/backend lifecycle matrix. Distinguish policy denial, unsupported capability, delivery acknowledgement, independently observed effect, and unknown outcome; bind authorization to principal, target, scope, current policy, expiry, and fencing epoch. NOT for claiming runtime correctness, proving an adapter from declarations, or approving a control-panel button without independent runtime evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs and audits deterministic, authority-filtered partitions of trust-typed context for already admitted bodies or abstract continuation slots. Use when causal context, obligations, disclosure boundaries, vector-space identity, capacity, and omission proofs must survive partitioning. NOT for spawning or admitting agents, choosing worker count, retrieving arbitrary knowledge, writing successor prompts, or granting tools, leases, identity, or effect authority.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design and scaffold new skills, subagents, and MCP surfaces. Use when choosing which primitive to create. NOT for invoking existing agents, generic coding help, or deployment work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs and audits closed, ordered, replay-safe message protocols between already admitted agent bodies. Use when a multi-agent exchange needs explicit epochs, audiences, per-sender sequencing, gathers, terminal fences, acknowledgements, and deterministic replay. NOT for selecting or spawning agents, granting identity or authority, choosing a runtime topology, general human facilitation, wire transport implementation, or deciding whether evidence is true.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design discovery, directories, and guilds for agent swarms at scale. Use when agents need to find each other on a shared surface: capability indices, yellow-pages directories, whois/phonebook routing, reputation-aware discovery, and guild structures that scope trust. Covers the canonical prior art (FIPA Directory Facilitator, Contract Net, Chord/DHT, DNS-SD/Consul, EigenTrust, Greif's merchant guilds) and the failure modes (read-poverty, Sybil reset, Goodhart on rank, directory staleness, cold-start). Triggers: "agents can't find each other", "who owns this file/skill", "route a question to the right agent", "capability registry", "agent reputation", "guild / federation of fleets". NOT for issuing identities, granting authority, or automatically assigning work from a directory entry.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design or audit an agent identity, credential, session, continuity, and reputation plan. Use when attributed outcomes must survive key rotation, restart, recovery, or review; when choosing Elo, TrueSkill, a contextual bandit, or an LLM judge; and when making Sybil, newcomer, calibration, collusion, and evidence limits explicit. Produces a supplied-plan consistency audit, never proof of observed delivery, cryptographic identity, or live enforcement. NOT for proving personhood, global Sybil resistance, or an unobserved delivery.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Data structures and serialization formats for agent-to-agent communication. Covers message envelopes, structured output schemas, capability declarations, task handoff payloads, error/retry signaling, and context windows as data structures. Compares the version-pinned A2A, MCP, and JSON-RPC role boundaries covered by this bundle; OpenAI and LangChain-specific APIs require their own current sources. Teaches when to use rigid schemas versus free-form content with validation, typed versus untyped boundaries, and streaming versus batch. Activate on: "agent message format", "agent communication schema", "agent-to-agent protocol", "A2A protocol", "MCP message format", "structured output for agents", "agent interop", "interchange format", "agent serialization", "task handoff format", "capability declaration". NOT for: what agents say to each other (use agent-conversation-protocols), orchestration topology (use multi-agent-coordination), building agent infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Discipline an AI agent needs to work an issue/task tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues) as the shared source of truth: pull the right next item instead of inventing work, search before creating to avoid duplicates, write actionable items with checkable acceptance criteria, keep status transitions honest, and link work to items via branches/PRs/commits so progress is legible. Use when an agent picks up tracker work, files a new issue, updates status, or closes an item. NOT for authoring the PR itself (use agent-pr-authoring), roadmap-level planning and prioritization (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), or the mechanics of multiple agents coordinating on the same codebase (use multi-agent-coordination).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a compact Coval test set from product requirements, observed conversation failures or a coverage gap. Design realistic scenarios with separate expected behaviors, provenance and controlled voice/persona variation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.