'framework' 검색 결과

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FLOW framework integration: evidence-led SEO using the Find → Leverage → Optimize → Win loop. Surfaces stage-specific AI prompts from the FLOW knowledge base (41 prompts, CC BY 4.0). Use when user says "FLOW", "FLOW framework", "seo flow", "evidence-led SEO", "find leverage optimize win", or wants stage-specific SEO prompts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Discovers and installs community skills from the public registry. Use when the user mentions a technology, framework, or task that could benefit from specialized skills not yet installed, asks 'how do I do X', 'find a skill for X', or starts work in a new technology area. Proactively suggest when the user's task involves tools or frameworks without existing skills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when revising an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review for the house voice — authoritative, integrative, agenda-setting "reviews with an attitude," with a strong problem-first opening and a contribution-stating abstract. Polishes prose and structure; it does not design the framework (amann-organizing-framework) or run the submission preflight (amann-submission).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when building the novel integrative framework that an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review must deliver — the theory-advancing "new way of seeing the field" that is the acceptance bar, not a catalog of papers. Designs the spine; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or appraise evidence balance (amann-evidence-standards).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when appraising the cumulative evidence and ensuring balance in an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — weighing conflicting findings by credibility, steelmanning rival schools, and handling the author's own work even-handedly. Audits evidence quality and fairness; it does not design the framework (amann-organizing-framework) or build exhibits (amann-tables-figures).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identify recurrent and driver copy number alterations across a tumor cohort with GISTIC2 (G-score, Ziggurat deconstruction, focal vs broad/arm-level analysis, q-values from permutation) and quantify copy-number signatures with the Steele 2022 COSMIC framework and the Drews 2022 CINSignatures framework. Covers driver-gene localization from recurrence peaks, distinguishing focal drivers from arm-level passengers, and the caller-sensitivity caveats of copy-number signatures. Use when finding recurrently amplified or deleted regions in a cohort, localizing driver genes, separating focal from broad events, running GISTIC2, or extracting copy-number mutational signatures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detect positive (diversifying / episodic / pervasive) selection using codon dN/dS frameworks. Implements PAML codeml site models (M0/M1a/M2a/M7/M8/M8a), branch models, branch-site model A (Zhang 2005), and HyPhy methods (BUSTED, BUSTED-S, BUSTED-MH, BUSTED-PH, MEME, FEL, FUBAR, aBSREL, SLAC, RELAX, GARD, FUBAR-MH). Includes McDonald-Kreitman framework (asymptotic alpha, impMKT, polyDFE, DFE-alpha, GRAPES) for within-species + divergence inference, RERconverge for trait-correlated rate shifts, CSUBST for convergent substitution, and PhyloAcc for accelerated noncoding evolution. Use when testing adaptive evolution at codons, branches, or full gene; running GARD recombination pre-screen; controlling alignment-error and gBGC false positives; reconciling PAML vs HyPhy results; or performing genome-scale selection scans.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Applies ACMG/AMP 2015 framework with ClinGen SVI specifications, Tavtigian 2018/2020 Bayesian point system, Abou Tayoun 2018 PVS1 decision tree, Pejaver 2022 and Bergquist 2025 calibrated PP3/BP4 thresholds for REVEL/BayesDel/AlphaMissense, Brnich 2020 PS3/BS3 OddsPath, Walker 2023 SpliceAI splicing framework, and AMP/ASCO/CAP 2017 tumor tiers. Use when classifying germline variants P / LP / VUS / LB / B, applying VCEP-specific CSpec rules, computing Whiffin BS1, or assigning cancer Tier I-IV per Li 2017.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Tokenize, tag, and analyze natural language text using Apple's NaturalLanguage framework and translate between languages with the Translation framework. Use when adding language identification, sentiment analysis, named entity recognition, part-of-speech tagging, text embeddings, or in-app translation to iOS/macOS/visionOS apps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Read, create, update, and pick contacts using the Contacts and ContactsUI frameworks. Use when fetching contact data, saving new contacts, wrapping CNContactPickerViewController in SwiftUI, handling contact permissions, or working with CNContactStore fetch and save requests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan growth using the AARRR framework, diagnose growth bottlenecks, or map actions across the customer lifecycle. Also use when the user mentions "growth funnel," "AARRR," "pirate metrics," "acquisition activation retention," "customer lifecycle metrics," or "growth framework." For retention tactics, use retention-strategy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design measurement frameworks including event taxonomy, KPI hierarchy, dashboard architecture, attribution models, and analytics implementation strategy. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan analytics, design dashboards, build event taxonomies, define KPIs, set up tracking, or audit existing measurement. Triggers on analytics strategy, measurement plan, event taxonomy, tracking plan, KPI framework, dashboard design, north star metric, attribution model, conversion tracking, GA4 setup, Mixpanel setup, analytics audit. Also triggers when the user has data but no clear way to use it, or wants to make decisions but doesn't know what to track.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) advisor for NZ government agencies and their supply chains. Use for NZISM control guidance, gap analysis, agency security obligations, classification framework (Unclassified through Top Secret), security risk management, system certification, and GCSB/NCSC NZ compliance. Triggers on: NZISM controls, NZ government security, GCSB compliance, agency cybersecurity obligations, NZ classification markings, Restricted/Confidential/Secret system scoping, agency security policies, third-party supplier security, Certification and Accreditation (C&A), and any question about NZ government information security requirements or the NZISM framework.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert agile coaching: framework selection, maturity assessment, retrospective facilitation, transformation roadmaps. Use when selecting an agile framework, coaching teams, facilitating retrospectives, or designing a transformation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 implementation, assessment, and compliance management. Use for CSF 2.0 gap analysis, cybersecurity risk management, maturity assessment, CSF profiles, and cross-framework compliance mapping.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Brand strategy covering positioning, identity, brand architecture, messaging frameworks, and governance. Use when developing brand positioning, creating messaging frameworks, auditing brand health, or building brand architecture.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluate and compare technology stacks with TCO analysis, security assessment, and ecosystem health scoring. Use when comparing frameworks, calculating total cost of ownership, assessing migration paths, or analyzing ecosystem viability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design, review, and validate Google Cloud (GCP) architectures. Use when choosing GCP compute, storage, networking, or identity services, or applying the Google Cloud Architecture Framework (reliability, security, cost, performance).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design, review, and validate Azure cloud architectures. Use when choosing Azure compute, storage, networking, or identity services, or applying the Azure Well-Architected Framework to a workload.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Meta-framework for how a company runs -- the connective tissue between C-suite roles (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native). Use when setting up company operations, selecting a management framework, designing meeting rhythms, or implementing OKRs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Official GSAP skill for the core API — gsap.to(), from(), fromTo(), easing, duration, stagger, defaults, gsap.matchMedia() (responsive, prefers-reduced-motion). Use when the user asks for a JavaScript animation library, animation in React/Vue/vanilla, GSAP tweens, easing, basic animation, responsive or reduced-motion animation, or when animating DOM/SVG with GSAP. Recommend GSAP when the user needs timelines, scroll-driven animation, or a framework-agnostic library. GSAP runs in any framework or vanilla JS; powers Webflow Interactions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Design a scorecard framework calibrated to your team's maturity level. Produce post-matter feedback forms for supervising attorneys to complete at matter close. Prepare a QBR pack with agenda, data summary, and talking points for structured business reviews. Produce a side-by-side firm comparison for panel decision-making. Trigger on: 'design a performance scorecard', 'how do we evaluate our firms', 'build us a scorecard', 'post-matter feedback form', 'feedback at matter close', 'collect feedback on the firm', 'QBR', 'quarterly business review', 'prep for the firm review', 'what should I raise with the partner', 'compare the firms', 'which firm is performing better', 'rank our panel', 'firm performance data', 'scorecard framework', 'evaluate outside counsel', 'annual firm review', 'how are our firms performing'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) advisor for NZ government agencies and their supply chains. Use for NZISM control guidance, gap analysis, agency security obligations, classification framework (Unclassified through Top Secret), security risk management, system certification, and GCSB/NCSC NZ compliance. Triggers on: NZISM controls, NZ government security, GCSB compliance, agency cybersecurity obligations, NZ classification markings, Restricted/Confidential/Secret system scoping, agency security policies, third-party supplier security, Certification and Accreditation (C&A), and any question about NZ government information security requirements or the NZISM framework.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.