'lua' 검색 결과

Records and evaluates event-specific probability forecasts for agent outputs. NOT for validation or automatic acceptance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Specifies bounded DAG execution contracts and evaluates executor receipts for dispatch, cancellation, joins, and effect reconciliation. Use when an implementation must bind a planned DAG to named runtime controls. NOT for claiming an executor is active, spawning agents, or certifying an effect from a plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Facilitate idea generation sessions that actually produce diverse, useful options instead of degenerating into the first plausible answer. Use for product ideation, feature exploration, problem-reframing, naming, design alternatives, strategic option-generation, or any task where the failure mode is "we picked the obvious thing too fast." Covers solo and group sessions, divergence/convergence discipline, technique selection (SCAMPER, Crazy Eights, How Might We, 6-3-5 Brainwriting, Reverse Brainstorming, Worst Possible Idea, Random Stimulus), facilitation moves for handling dominant voices and groupthink, and structured convergence to a shortlist with rationale. Outputs a session artifact with options generated, evaluation, shortlist, and the rejected-but-interesting list.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Architecture and systems design for agents that retain bounded state across sessions. Covers durable event history, owned state, derived memory, retrieval indexes, framework evaluation, recovery, deletion, and rebuild behavior. Uses constructed implementation examples and workload calibration rather than universal vendor, latency, similarity, retention, or cost claims. Activate on: "always-on agent", "persistent agent architecture", "episodic memory system", "agent memory design", "long-running agent", "stateful agent", "agent that remembers", "MemGPT architecture", "Letta deployment", "/always-on-agent-architecture". NOT for: choosing what data to feed the agent (use always-on-agent-inputs), brainstorming applications (use always-on-agent-applications), safety and privacy concerns (use always-on-agent-safety), general agentic patterns (use agentic-patterns).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Set up and connect a new Coval agent for evaluation. Guides through agent type selection, endpoint configuration, system prompt, and default resource attachment. Use when user says "set up an agent", "connect my agent", "create an agent", "add an agent", or "configure agent endpoint".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit an existing Coval evaluation setup for coverage, misleading scores, missing evidence, judge validation and execution risk. Read-only; use when inheriting an eval or deciding whether its results support a release decision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Retrieve and analyze simulation results from a Coval run. Use when user wants to review evaluation outcomes or debug agent behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Choose the next useful step for evaluating a voice or chat agent with Coval. Use for getting started or deciding what to do next; use a specific skill directly when the task is already clear.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Delegate a read-only Coval evaluation, simulation, monitoring, product-how-to, or troubleshooting subtask to Sofia through the official Coval MCP consult_sofia tool. Use when the user needs Coval-specific FDE judgment, analysis of organization data, metric or test-set recommendations, or a diagnosis grounded in Coval runs and conversations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Launch a specific Coval evaluation with explicit cases and execution bounds. Use when resources are already selected; for result analysis use quick-eval.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

End-to-end Coval adversarial / red-team testing workflow. Builds one adversarial test set (12 core attack vectors plus legitimate controls, each with an expected-behavior checklist), creates a persistent "Adversarial User" persona and a Composite Evaluation metric that scores each scenario against its own expected behaviors, launches a multi-iteration run against the agent (voice or chat), polls for completion, builds a per-scenario pass/fail scorecard, and creates a saved report grouped by Test Case. Use when a user wants to follow the Adversarial & Red-Team Testing cookbook (https://docs.coval.dev/guides/adversarial-red-team-testing) without doing each step by hand. Triggers: "adversarial test set", "red team my agent", "jailbreak / prompt-injection testing", "test my agent against bad actors".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design abstract strategy games with perfect information, no randomness, and strategic depth. Use when designing a board game, exploring abstract strategy games, brainstorming game mechanics, or evaluating game balance. Keywords: board game, game design, strategy, mechanics, balance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Complete workflow for static structural analysis. Use when analyzing stress, displacement, or reaction forces under constant loads. For strength and stiffness evaluation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The science of learning through controlled experimentation. A/B testing isn't about picking winners—it's about building a culture of validated learning and reducing the cost of being wrong. This skill covers experiment design, statistical rigor, feature flagging, analysis, and building experimentation into product development. The best experimenters know that every test, positive or negative, teaches something valuable. Use when "a/b test, experiment, hypothesis, statistical significance, sample size, feature flag, variant, control, treatment, p-value, conversion rate, test winner, split test, experimentation, testing, statistics, feature-flags, hypothesis, growth, optimization, learning, validation" mentioned.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Perform 12-Factor App compliance analysis on any codebase. Use when evaluating application architecture, auditing SaaS applications, or reviewing cloud-native applications against the original 12-Factor methodology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions implementing eval-driven development (EDD) principles

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Codified expertise for managing carrier portfolios, negotiating freight rates, tracking carrier performance, allocating freight, and maintaining strategic carrier relationships. Informed by transportation managers with 15+ years experience. Includes scorecarding frameworks, RFP processes, market intelligence, and compliance vetting. Use when managing carriers, negotiating rates, evaluating carrier performance, or building freight strategies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

X-ray any AI model's behavioral patterns — refusal boundaries, hallucination tendencies, reasoning style, formatting defaults. No API key needed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Azure Resource Manager SDK for Arize AI Observability and Evaluation (.NET).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

High-level SDK for Azure AI Foundry projects with agents, connections, deployments, and evaluations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Azure AI Projects SDK for .NET. High-level client for Azure AI Foundry projects including agents, connections, datasets, deployments, evaluations, and indexes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Azure AI Projects SDK for Java. High-level SDK for Azure AI Foundry project management including connections, datasets, indexes, and evaluations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.