415건 · 관련도순
字符串空格清理工具。读取结构化数据文件（CSV、TSV、Excel等），检查所有字符串类型（object）字段， 删除字段值前后多余的空格，然后输出为相同格式的文件。当用户提到空格清理、去除空格、trim、清理字符串空格等需求时使用此skill。 即使用户没有明确说出"空格清理"，只要任务涉及读取结构化文件并删除字符串字段的前后空格，就应该使用此skill。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
四舍五入数据处理工具。读取结构化数据文件和标准配置文件，根据配置对数字型字段进行四舍五入处理， 然后输出为相同格式的文件。当用户提到四舍五入、数字取整、保留小数位、数据舍入等需求时使用此skill。 即使用户没有明确说出"四舍五入"，只要任务涉及根据配置文件对数据进行舍入处理，就应该使用此skill。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
文档去重工具。使用精确匹配（MD5哈希）在文档级别删除重复的样本。 当用户提到文档去重、删除重复文档、样本去重、文本去重、去除重复内容、 清洗重复数据、整理文档集合等需求时使用此skill。 即使用户没有明确说出"去重"，只要任务涉及从多个文档中识别和删除重复内容， 就应该使用此skill。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
将解压的XML目录重新打包为DOCX文件
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
将DOCX文档转换为Markdown格式
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
验证DOCX文件格式有效性
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
领域缩略语展开 Skill：按内置或外部词典将独立缩略语替换为全称，可选在全称后保留原缩写。 适用于技术文本、论文摘要和业务记录中的缩写清洗；不负责模糊缩写消歧或大小写无关替换。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
清理文本中的链接（HTTP/HTTPS/FTP）。当用户提到清理链接、删除URL、去除超链接、清理网页链接等需求时使用此skill。 即使用户没有明确说出"链接"，只要任务涉及从文本中删除或替换URL链接，就应该使用此skill。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
本skill是用于单细胞样本性别判定的专用技能，首先需要用户上传需要处理的单细胞样本数据，再判定未标注性别的样本，或纠正标注错误的性别信息，生成最后的修正文件。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
清除文本示例中的IPv4和IPv6地址。当用户提到清理IP、删除IP地址、去除IP、清理网络地址等需求时使用此skill。 即使用户没有明确说出"IP"，只要任务涉及从文本中删除或替换IP地址，就应该使用此skill。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
用于 Workflow Planning 阶段的占位算子。当前 Skill 库不存在满足用户需求的业务 Skill 时，使用本算子保持 DAG 数据流完整，等待后续生成真实 Skill 后替换。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
清理文本样本中的电子邮件。当用户提到清理邮件、删除邮箱、去除邮件地址、清理个人信息等需求时使用此skill。 即使用户没有明确说出"邮件"，只要任务涉及从文本中删除或替换邮箱地址，就应该使用此skill。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
平均行长度过滤器。过滤文本平均行长度不在指定范围内的样本。 当用户提到行长度过滤、平均行长度、文本行长度筛选、按行筛选等需求时使用此skill。 即使用户没有明确说出"平均行长度"，只要任务涉及根据文本中每行的平均长度来筛选数据， 就应该使用此skill。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
清理文本示例中的HTML代码。当用户提到清理HTML、去除HTML标签、HTML转文本、提取网页文本等需求时使用此skill。 即使用户没有明确说出"HTML"，只要任务涉及从HTML代码中提取纯文本，就应该使用此skill。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
批量文件清单采集器。扫描一个或多个本地文件/目录，或从任务列表加载路径， 按支持的扩展名生成文件元信息清单，供后续文本、表格、文档、图像等采集流程继续处理。 当用户需要批量盘点待采集文件、生成本地文件 manifest、统计输入文件类型或为后续采集算子准备文件清单时使用此 skill。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured requirements elicitation for analysis requests. Use when scoping new analysis projects, clarifying ambiguous business questions, or documenting analysis acceptance criteria with stakeholders.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Position an AI product when everyone claims AI and skeptics call it "just a wrapper." Find the real wedge (data, workflow, trust, domain), make reliability the differentiator, answer "won't the big labs just build this," and stop leading with "AI-powered." Use when your AI or dev tool blends into a sea of similar demos, buyers doubt the accuracy, or you can't say why you win when the model is a commodity.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guide for implementing GDPR-valid consent under Article 7 conditions and Article 4(11) definition. Covers five core requirements: freely given, specific, informed, unambiguous, and clear affirmative action. Includes pre-ticked boxes prohibition per Planet49 CJEU C-673/17, consent form audit checklist, and practical implementation patterns.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI creative director with recursive self-assessment. Generates concepts using world-class methodologies (SIT, TRIZ, Lateral Thinking, bisociation), scores against 6 weighted criteria with Cannes/D&AD/HumanKind calibration, and recursively refines until the 9+ threshold is reached. Accepts briefs in any format — text, voice transcript, PDF, or raw notes. Use when the user asks to generate creative concepts, brainstorm campaign ideas, develop a Big Idea or campaign platform, evaluate or critique existing creative work, find consumer insights, or shares a brief for ideation — including activations, PR-stunts, brand utility, experiential, and non-advertising ideas. Calibrates against a library of 569 legendary campaigns (P01-P18 pattern map) to detect saturation and ensure originality. Do not use for media planning, production budgeting, brand identity/logo design, copywriting final drafts, or market research data collection.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Visualizes ChIP-seq data using deepTools (computeMatrix, plotHeatmap, plotProfile, bamCoverage, bamCompare), pyGenomeTracks (modern INI-driven track plots), Gviz (R browser-style), EnrichedHeatmap (ComplexHeatmap-based), ChIPseeker tag heatmaps, and IGV batch screenshots. Handles bigWig normalization choices (CPM, BPM, RPGC, spike-in scaled), bamCompare operations (log2 ratio, subtract, SES), k-means clustering of heatmaps for biological subgrouping, and spike-in-scaled tracks for global-shift experiments. Use when generating publication-quality ChIP-seq signal heatmaps, profile plots, genome-browser tracks, or comparing samples visually.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Author and maintain MANUAL and hybrid test cases and suites in TestRail, Xray (Jira), Zephyr Scale, and Qase. Covers test-case anatomy (title, preconditions, steps, expected results, test data), suite/section organization, bulk authoring from user stories and acceptance criteria, ambiguous-step linting, CSV/API import-export payloads per tool, requirement traceability and coverage gaps, review hygiene, and when a manual case should graduate to automation. Use when: "write a test case," "manual test case," "TestRail case," "Xray test," "Zephyr Scale case," "Qase case," "import CSV into TestRail," "lint these steps," "traceability report," "should this be automated." Not for: Generating automated TEST CODE — that is ai-test-generation. Sprint-level WHAT-to-test selection — that is test-planning. Related: ai-test-generation, test-planning, exploratory-testing, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
投行并购 (投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship banking、长期 coverage、reputational capital)」, 「叙事/包装 (the story, equity story, positioning) ⇄ 数字/尽调 (the numbers, diligence, quality of earnings)」, 「估值的科学外衣 (DCF/comps 的伪精确) ⇄ 谈判的真实定价 (价格由 leverage、竞争、时机决定)」; (b) 估值与分析正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — DCF (折现现金流: FCF 预测/WACC 折现率/terminal value 终值/Gordon growth vs exit multiple), Comparable Companies (可比公司/trading comps: EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, P/E), Precedent Transactions (先例交易/deal comps: control premium 控制权溢价), LBO (杠杆收购模型: IRR/MOIC/debt schedule/sources & uses), Accretion/Dilution (增厚/摊薄分析: EPS 影响、pro forma), Sum-of-the-Parts (分部估值/SOTP), Football Field (估值区间图), Merger Model (合并模型: synergies 协同/purchase accounting/goodwill), Sensitivity/scenario; (c) 交易流程与产出物 — 卖方流程 (sell-side: teaser 简介 → NDA → CIM/IM 信息备忘录 → management presentation → IOI 意向函 → data room 数据室 → LOI/term sheet → confirmatory diligence → SPA 买卖协议 → signing → closing), 买方流程 (buy-side: thesis/sourcing → outreach → valuation → bid → exclusivity → diligence → financing → close), auction 类型 (broad/targeted/negotiated/preemptive bid); 产出物: pitchbook 推介材料、CIM、fairness opinion 公平意见、board presentation、fee letter、engagement letter; (d) 交易结构与条款 — consideration (cash/stock/mix/earnout 对赌)、deal protections (breakup fee 分手费/go-shop/no-shop/MAC 重大不利变化条款)、representations & warranties 陈述与保证、escrow 托管、working capital adjustment 营运资金调整、reverse termination fee、collar 价格区间、tender offer vs merger、hostile vs friendly、defensive tactics (poison pill 毒丸/white knight 白衣骑士/staggered board); (e) 行业结构与角色 — bulge bracket (高盛/摩根士丹利/JPM/BofA/花旗) vs elite boutique (Centerview/Evercore/Moelis/Lazard/PJT/Perella) vs middle market (Houlihan Lokey/William Blair/Harris Williams) vs regional/independent; analyst→associate→VP→director→MD 晋升金字塔; coverage (行业组) vs product (M&A/ECM/DCM/leveraged finance/restructuring); sponsors group (服务 PE); 买方包括 PE/strategic acquirer/corp dev; (f) 量化指标与节奏 — deal fee (success fee 业内通常约 1-2% 视规模递减/retainer/Lehman formula)、league table 排行榜、pitch→mandate 转化、deal velocity、hours culture (analyst 80-100h/week 文化批判)、bonus/comp 结构、deal sheet (简历上的成交清单); (g) 争议/批判 — fairness opinion 是否橡皮图章 (利益冲突: 出意见的 banker 也收成交费)、estimate 的伪精确 (DCF garbage in garbage out、假设驱动结论)、banker 永远建议成交 (deal 偏见、empire building 助推 CEO 自利并购)、协同效应系统性高估 (大量并购毁灭价值、winner's curse 赢家诅咒)、analyst 血汗工厂文化 (2021 高盛 13 人 deck 事件、过劳死争议)、advisory 价值 vs 中介寻租之争、bulge vs boutique 的利益独立性叙事 (boutique 标榜「无承销利益冲突」)、SPAC 泡沫与 de-SPAC 教训; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 估值学派 (Aswath Damodaran 估值教父/纽大、Tim Koller McKinsey《Valuation》、McKinsey valuation 体系) vs 公司金融教科书派 (Rosenbaum & Pearl《Investment Banking》行业圣经、Brealey Myers Allen、CFI/WSP/BIWS 培训体系) vs 交易实战派 (Bruce Wasserstein《Big Deal》、Joseph Perella/Felix Rohatyn 老派 dealmaker、现代 boutique 创始人) vs 行为/批判派 (并购毁灭价值的学术证据、Damodaran 对协同/控制权溢价的批判、Matt Levine《Money Stuff》解构华尔街逻辑) vs PE/buy-side 视角 (LBO 数学、value creation 杠杆/运营/multiple expansion)。不含: 二级市场股票交易/卖方研究 (equity research)、零售财富管理/private banking、纯 ECM/IPO 承销执行 (虽相关但聚焦 M&A advisory)、纯 PE 投后运营、量化交易/对冲基金策略、纯公司财务报表会计。) Master OS — automated mastery of 投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (rela
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user requests a deep dive, exploratory analysis, or data analysis on BigQuery. Not for credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.