611건 · 관련도순
Writes product-led content pages optimized for both search engines and AI engine citations. Produces markdown files with frontmatter, following page-type frameworks (comparison, guide, use case, learn, trust) with verified sources and no fabricated data.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when building exhibits for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — the signature framework figure, who-studied-what synthesis tables, and search/coverage exhibits that summarize across a literature. Designs review exhibits; it does not produce original-estimate regression tables (an Annals review reports no new data of its own).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs differential expression on bulk RNA-seq count data with edgeR's negative-binomial GLM and quasi-likelihood F-test framework. Covers DGEList construction, filterByExpr, TMM/TMMwsp normalization, robust dispersion estimation, glmQLFit/glmQLFTest, TREAT for magnitude-bounded hypotheses, contrasts via no-intercept designs, voom and voomWithQualityWeights for heterogeneous samples, and the edgeR v4 bias-corrected APL changes. Use when running bulk DE with edgeR, choosing edgeR over DESeq2 (small n, transcript DE via catchSalmon, large samples), needing TREAT for a fold-change-threshold hypothesis, troubleshooting v3-to-v4 reproducibility, building paired or interaction designs, or handling library-quality heterogeneity.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs subgroup and heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) analyses for clinical trials. Covers Mantel-Haenszel pooling, Breslow-Day, interaction tests in regression, RERI for additive interaction, modern data-adaptive HTE methods (STEPP, SIDES, causal forests, X/R-learners), Bayesian shrinkage (Dixon-Simon, MAP, EXNEX), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), and credibility frameworks (Sun BMJ, EMA 2019). Use when analyzing treatment effects across patient subgroups for regulatory submissions or precision-medicine claims.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Normalizes ChIP-seq data using exogenous spike-in (ChIP-Rx with Drosophila chromatin per Orlando 2014 / Egan 2016; E. coli carryover for CUT&RUN/CUT&Tag). Distinguishes RRPM from Rx-Input scaling, integrates with DiffBind / DESeq2 / edgeR / csaw via sizeFactors and DiffBind library-size vectors, applies the Patel et al 2024 *Nat Biotechnol* failure-mode framework, and validates that normalization is applied at the read level (not peak counts). Use when global signal shifts are expected (HDACi, BETi, EZH2i, dosage, target knockdown), when ChIPseqSpikeInFree detects post-hoc shifts, or when validating internal-control regions before publication.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Queries gnomAD v4 (807k samples), v3, v2.1.1, and constraint metrics with grpmax FAF95, bottleneck-group exclusion, LOEUF interpretation, SV/CNV/mtDNA catalogs, and Whiffin max-credible-AF framework. Use when filtering rare variants, applying ACMG BS1/BA1, ranking genes by LoF intolerance, or selecting between v2 (GRCh37 + chrX/Y constraint) and v4 (GRCh38 + 807k samples).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Queries ClinVar for variant pathogenicity classifications, ClinGen VCEP curations, and somatic-vs-germline interpretations via REST API, weekly VCF, or bulk XML. Use when determining clinical significance, triangulating conflicting interpretations, or aggregating evidence against the ACMG/AMP framework with ClinGen SVI specifications.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Implement computer vision features including text recognition (OCR), face detection, barcode scanning, image segmentation, object tracking, and document scanning in iOS apps. Covers both the modern Swift-native Vision API (iOS 18+) and legacy VNRequest patterns, VisionKit DataScannerViewController for live camera scanning, and CoreMLRequest/VNCoreMLRequest for custom model inference. Use when adding OCR, barcode scanning, face detection, or custom Core ML model inference with Vision.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build industrial-grade SCADA/HMI dashboards in MATLAB following industrial-HMI conventions (ISA-101-aligned): gray-field philosophy, alarms at source, write safeguards, fixed-range trends, drill-down layout. Produces a real App Designer app (.mlapp, or plain-text .m+.xml on R2026b+) by handing serialization to the matlab-build-app skill when available, and falls back to a programmatic .m app otherwise. Use when wrapping OPC UA / Modbus / MQTT / OSI PI / PI AF monitoring scripts into a live operator app, building plant overviews, designing operator dashboards, or any time a user asks for a "SCADA dashboard", "HMI", "plant dashboard", "operator screen", or "industrial monitoring app" in MATLAB. Trigger on: SCADA, HMI, industrial dashboard, plant overview, operator screen, uigauge, uilamp, alarm banner, gray-field, ISA-101, OPC UA dashboard, setpoint, write safeguards, alarm visualization, OSIsoft PI, AVEVA PI, PI Server, PI Data Archive, PI AF, PI Asset Framework, piclient, afclient.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Builds, tests, diagnoses, upgrades, deploys and verifies Power Apps component framework (PCF) code components for model-driven apps and Power Pages — field and dataset controls, standard and virtual (React) — from Microsoft-maintained templates and recipes pinned to a tested version matrix. Runs quality gates (manifest and host lint, source checks, lint, unit tests, production build), deploys with pac pcf push, verifies registration and form bindings, and guides Power Pages enablement, with guided setup for canvas apps. Use when the user wants to build, fix, upgrade, deploy or check a PCF control or code component, or asks why one fails to build, import, update or render. For a whole page use /model-apps:genpage; for a whole app use /model-apps:app-builder.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus, Reg. (EU) 2026/1744, in force July 27, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of August 2026. GPAI enforcement powers active since August 2, 2026.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) advisor covering the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF v2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about SWIFT CSP, CSCF controls, SWIFT security attestation, KYC-SA portal, SWIFT architecture types (A1/A2/A3/A4/B), mandatory vs advisory controls, independent assessment, SWIFT secure zone, secure flow zone, MFA for operators, SWIFT messaging security, payment fraud prevention on SWIFT, gap analysis for CSCF, or compliance with SWIFT's 32 controls (26 mandatory, 6 advisory in v2026) across the three objectives: Secure Your Environment, Know and Limit Access, Detect and Respond. Control 2.4 (Back-Office Data Flow Security) is now mandatory in v2026. v2026 attestation window is July 1– December 31, 2026. Trigger for any SWIFT CSP or CSCF compliance question.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Business intelligence across dashboard design, visualization, and reporting automation. Use when designing dashboards, building KPI frameworks, automating reports, creating data stories, or optimizing BI tool performance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Integrate Java business systems with ReachAI SDK registration, SDK instance heartbeat, gateway/embed access, and optional API Management handoff. Use when asked to connect a Spring Boot service to ReachAI, add reachai-capability-sdk or reachai-spring-boot2-starter, configure reachai.registry/reachai.project/reachai.capability, prepare @ReachCapability metadata for later manual SDK sync, or verify SDK onboarding from a ReachAI manifest.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Implement Terraform provider ephemeral resources with the Plugin Framework: the Open/Renew/Close lifecycle, ephemeral schema design, registration via EphemeralResources, renewal for expiring credentials, and how ephemeral values flow into write-only attributes and provider configuration. Use when adding an ephemeral resource, exposing secrets/tokens/certificates that must never persist in state or plan, deciding between an ephemeral resource and a data source, or wiring short-lived credentials from one provider into another.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic contract negotiation strategies for technology services agreements with German/EU law specificity. Provides three-position framework (provider-favorable, balanced, client-favorable), deal-size calibration (€100K to €10M+), five-tier objection handling with regulatory leverage (GDPR, DORA, NIS2, BGB), concession packaging, and position matrices for liability, IP, payment, SLA, data protection, and termination. Use when: (1) Developing negotiation strategies for SaaS, cloud, or managed services agreements, (2) Preparing position papers and fallback positions, (3) Responding to counterparty objections, (4) Structuring concession packages that protect core economics, (5) Calibrating tactics to deal size and leverage, or (6) Applying German contract law constraints (BGB §§ 305-310 AGB, § 309 Nr. 7 liability limits, § 288 statutory interest).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) advisor covering the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF v2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about SWIFT CSP, CSCF controls, SWIFT security attestation, KYC-SA portal, SWIFT architecture types (A1/A2/A3/A4/B), mandatory vs advisory controls, independent assessment, SWIFT secure zone, secure flow zone, MFA for operators, SWIFT messaging security, payment fraud prevention on SWIFT, gap analysis for CSCF, or compliance with SWIFT's 32 controls (25 mandatory, 7 advisory in v2026) across the three objectives: Secure Your Environment, Know and Limit Access, Detect and Respond. Control 2.4 (Back-Office Data Flow Security) is now mandatory in v2026. v2026 attestation window is July 1– December 31, 2026. Trigger for any SWIFT CSP or CSCF compliance question.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (NIST AI 100-1 + the NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile) to a specific AI system, governance question, or impact assessment. Three modes — consult, governance plan, full assessment — all cite Subcategories (`GOVERN 1.1`) and Profile Action IDs (`GV-1.2-001`) verbatim. Use when the user mentions the AI RMF, NIST RMF, NIST AI 100-1, NIST AI 600-1, GenAI Profile, the four functions (Govern / Map / Measure / Manage), the trustworthy AI characteristics, the 12 GAI risks (confabulation, harmful bias, information integrity, CBRN, data privacy, etc.), or asks "what does NIST say about X" for an AI system.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus adopted June 29, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of July 2026. GPAI enforcement powers activate August 2, 2026.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Tags harness-decomposed curriculum items (KUDs, LTs, criteria) with a school's developmental band metadata while preserving source voice and labels. Supply the band schema; the skill derives mapping rules from it.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build RL reward signals using the OpenJudge framework. Covers choosing between pointwise and pairwise reward strategies based on RL algorithm, task type, and cost; aggregating multi-dimensional pointwise scores into a scalar reward; pairwise tournament reward for GRPO on subjective tasks (net win rate across group rollouts); generating preference pairs for DPO/RLAIF; and normalizing scores for training stability. Use when building reward models, scoring rollouts for GRPO/REINFORCE, generating preference data for DPO, or doing Best-of-N selection.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build custom LLM evaluation pipelines using the OpenJudge framework. Covers selecting and configuring graders (LLM-based, function-based, agentic), running batch evaluations with GradingRunner, combining scores with aggregators, applying evaluation strategies (voting, average), auto-generating graders from data, and analyzing results (pairwise win rates, statistics, validation metrics). Use when the user wants to evaluate LLM outputs, compare multiple models, design scoring criteria, or build an automated evaluation system.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
The HyperFrames composition contract — build one renderable project. Use for composition structure, the `data-*` timing attributes, `class="clip"`, tracks, sub-compositions, variables, framework-owned media playback, deterministic-render rules, and validation. Also covers Tailwind projects and the STORYBOARD.md / SCRIPT.md plan formats. Read before writing composition HTML.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.