Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation) plus Cobra/Viper conventions where applicable. Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
inference-gateway/a2a-debugger☆ 32026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Idiomatic Go - package and interface design, error wrapping, table-driven tests, generics, the modern standard library (slices/maps/cmp/errors.Join), current syntax, and logging discipline. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring any Go code, especially code drifting toward Java/Spring shapes (deep layer trees, generic repositories, heavy frameworks) - even if the user never says "idiomatic". Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
inference-gateway/a2a-debugger☆ 32026년 10월 20일 업데이트
Author the project's non-negotiable engineering rules — the constitution that every feature spec, plan, and implementation must satisfy. Load when the user asks to write a constitution, define project rules, set engineering invariants, write project standards, define non-negotiables, capture agent guardrails as policy, or when spec-driven-development orchestrator routes here. Also triggers on "project constitution", "engineering invariants", "non-negotiable rules", "project policy", "set our standards", "/constitution". Output: docs/constitution.md. The third strategic artifact alongside AGENTS.md (agent behavior) and product-soul (strategy).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
dvy1987/agent-loom☆ 32026년 8월 8일 업데이트
Capture actionable learnings that emerge during conversation — when the agent or user discovers that a skill, a set of skills, or a process needs to be updated based on what's happening in the current chat. Sub-skill of the learn-from orchestrator. Load when the user says "we should update the skill for this", "this should be a skill rule", "add this as a gotcha", "the skill should know about this", "update the process for this", "remember this for next time", "this is important for the skill". Also triggers when the agent notices a skill's guidance was wrong or incomplete, a process step failed or was unnecessary, a new pattern emerged, a guardrail was missing, a workaround became a pattern, or a debugging session reveals a gap.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
dvy1987/agent-loom☆ 32026년 8월 8일 업데이트
Record durable project decisions with rationale, alternatives, assumptions, status, and revisit triggers. Load when the user says record this decision, we decided, decision log, why did we choose, revisit this later, or capture architectural/process rationale.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
dvy1987/agent-loom☆ 32026년 8월 8일 업데이트
Apply Boyd's OODA loop to navigate fast-moving, uncertain, or competitive situations — Observe what is actually happening, Orient through mental models and context, Decide on the clearest path, Act quickly, then loop again. Load when the situation is changing faster than the current plan, when a competitive response is needed, when the user is stuck in analysis paralysis in a dynamic environment, when shipping under uncertainty, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a fast-moving / competitive frame. Triggers on "what should we do right now", "the situation is changing", "how do we respond to this", "competitive response", "we need to move fast", or "we're stuck deciding". Based on John Boyd's OODA loop — Observe, Orient, Decide, Act — adapted for product and business contexts (OODA Canvas 2026).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
dvy1987/agent-loom☆ 32026년 8월 8일 업데이트
Review a built frontend against its chosen direction, catch drift back to generic AI defaults, enforce state coverage, ethical patterns, UX heuristics, and polish, and check contrast with APCA (not the legacy WCAG ratio). Produces specific, prioritized fixes — never vibes-based feedback. Works with pasted screenshots or Playwright MCP automated capture. Load when the user asks to review a UI, audit a design, check if a frontend looks generic or vibecoded, evaluate visual quality or polish, says "review this UI", "is this design good", "audit my frontend", "does this feel like [product]", "design QA", or when frontend-design routes here. Sub-skill of frontend-design.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
dvy1987/agent-loom☆ 32026년 8월 8일 업데이트
Capture the "why" behind technical choices to prevent architectural drift. Load when the user makes a major technical decision, chooses a library/framework, defines a system boundary, or changes a core architectural pattern. Also triggers on "record a decision", "write an ADR", "why did we do this", "document this architectural choice", or "architectural decision record". Supports `SYNTHESIS=true` mode for retrospective ADR backfill from observed repo state — used by `retroactive-project-setup` and any future backfill skill. Essential for long-term project maintainability and agent alignment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
dvy1987/agent-loom☆ 32026년 8월 8일 업데이트
Write the executable feature specification — the WHAT and WHY artifact that agents and reviewers treat as source of truth. Owns both /specify and /clarify modes. Load when the user asks to write a feature spec, write a specification, write an executable spec, define functional requirements, capture acceptance criteria as Given/When/Then, or when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes here. Also triggers on "feature spec", "executable spec", "/specify", "/clarify", "write the spec for this feature", "specification for", "spec-driven", "machine-readable spec". Output: docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-feature-spec.md. Hard gate: cannot Approve while [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
dvy1987/agent-loom☆ 32026년 8월 8일 업데이트
Find the earliest decisive failure in an agent run trace and propose an evidence-backed targeted repair. Load when a run failed, results are wrong, or the user asks what went wrong in an agent session. Also triggers on "localize the fault", "first incorrect step", "debug this run", "trace attribution", "why did the agent fail", or after run-trace captures errors. Pairs with debug-and-fix for code defects and dynamic-routing for plan faults.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
dvy1987/agent-loom☆ 32026년 8월 8일 업데이트
Complete migration guide from Prisma ORM v6 to v7 covering all breaking changes. Use when upgrading Prisma versions, encountering v7 errors, or migrating existing projects. Triggers on "upgrade to prisma 7", "prisma 7 migration", "prisma-client generator", "driver adapter required".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
prisma/prisma-plugin☆ 32026년 10월 9일 업데이트
Track Apple devices and AirTags via FindMy.app on macOS using AppleScript and screen capture.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
q2805187159/Anvil☆ 32026년 6월 24일 업데이트
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
q2805187159/Anvil☆ 32026년 6월 24일 업데이트
Systematic exploratory QA testing of web applications — find bugs, capture evidence, and generate structured reports
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
q2805187159/Anvil☆ 32026년 6월 24일 업데이트
Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or write professional research reports including but not limited to market analysis, consumer insights, brand analysis, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, investment due diligence, or any consulting-grade analytical report. This skill operates in two phases — (1) generating a structured analysis framework with chapter skeleton, data query requirements, and analysis logic, and (2) after data collection by other skills, producing the final consulting-grade report with structured narratives, embedded charts, and strategic insights.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
q2805187159/Anvil☆ 32026년 6월 24일 업데이트
Generate a personalized SOUL.md through a warm, adaptive onboarding conversation. Trigger when the user wants to create, set up, or initialize their AI partner's identity, or when a SOUL.md is missing. Also trigger for updates such as "update my SOUL.md", "change my AI's personality", or "tweak the soul".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
q2805187159/Anvil☆ 32026년 6월 24일 업데이트
Searches and explores Burp Suite project files (.burp) from the command line. Use when searching response headers or bodies with regex patterns, extracting security audit findings, dumping proxy history or site map data, or analyzing HTTP traffic captured in a Burp project.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
nimoqup046-collab/agora☆ 32026년 3월 26일 업데이트
AI operational modes (brainstorm, implement, debug, review, teach, ship, orchestrate). Use to adapt behavior based on task type.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
nimoqup046-collab/agora☆ 32026년 3월 26일 업데이트
Azure AI Vision Image Analysis SDK for captions, tags, objects, OCR, people detection, and smart cropping. Use for computer vision and image understanding tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
nimoqup046-collab/agora☆ 32026년 3월 26일 업데이트
Build image analysis applications with Azure AI Vision SDK for Java. Use when implementing image captioning, OCR text extraction, object detection, tagging, or smart cropping.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
nimoqup046-collab/agora☆ 32026년 3월 26일 업데이트
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
nimoqup046-collab/agora☆ 32026년 3월 26일 업데이트
Assembles genomes de novo from noisy long reads (Oxford Nanopore R9/R10/Dorado, PacBio CLR) with Flye (repeat graph), Canu (correct-trim-assemble OLC), NextDenovo, Shasta, Raven, wtdbg2, or miniasm, and reconciles bacterial assemblies into a consensus with Trycycler/Autocycler. Covers matching the input flag to the basecaller era (--nano-hq vs --nano-raw), why a raw long-read assembly is contiguous but low-QV and not finished until polished, haplotig false-duplication and purge_dups, coverage and read-N50 as non-substitutable inputs, and mid-read adapter de-chimerization. Use when assembling a bacterial or eukaryotic genome from ONT or PacBio noisy reads, choosing a long-read assembler, or diagnosing an over-collapsed or duplicated assembly. For PacBio HiFi use hifi-assembly instead.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
peacezha/HPClaw☆ 32026년 10월 11일 업데이트
Detects and removes contamination in genome assemblies via two disjoint workflows - foreign-sequence screening of a single-organism (eukaryote/isolate) assembly with NCBI FCS-GX (GenBank-submission-mandatory), FCS-adaptor, and BlobToolKit blob plots; and MAG/bin quality assessment with CheckM2 plus GUNC (chimerism) plus GTDB-Tk taxonomy, judged against MIMAG. Covers why CheckM2 alone is blind to disjoint-marker chimeras, the FCS-GX RAM wall, organelle/NUMT triage, strain heterogeneity, and the HGT-vs-contamination (tardigrade) trap. Use when screening an assembly for foreign contamination before GenBank submission, assessing MAG completeness/contamination/chimerism, deciding which contigs to remove, or distinguishing real HGT from contaminant contigs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
peacezha/HPClaw☆ 32026년 10월 11일 업데이트
Computes and interprets sequencing read depth and coverage over a genome, windows, or target regions with mosdepth (windowed depth, cumulative distribution, --quantize callable BEDs), bedtools genomecov/coverage (bedGraph tracks, per-target stats), samtools depth/coverage (per-base depth, per-contig depth+breadth). Covers the breadth-vs-mean distinction, the cumulative-coverage curve, evenness (CV/Fano/fold-80/Gini), what each tool silently counts (duplicates, secondary/supplementary, MAPQ, read span vs fragment, mate-overlap), the samtools-depth 8000-cap version trap, and the bedtools coverage -a/-b orientation flip. Use when assessing sequencing adequacy, building coverage tracks, computing breadth at a depth threshold, defining callable regions, or QCing target-capture uniformity.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
peacezha/HPClaw☆ 32026년 10월 11일 업데이트