'decision' 검색 결과

Query and download from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and EMBL-EBI's BioStudies/ArrayExpress mirror. Use when finding expression datasets, navigating SuperSeries vs SubSeries, choosing between series-matrix (submitter-normalized) and raw supplementary files, downloading via GEOparse (Python) or GEOquery (R/Bioconductor), linking GEO to SRA for raw reads, or distinguishing GSE/GSM/GPL/GDS record types. Encodes the SuperSeries trap, the series-matrix normalization-trust caveat, GEOmetadb deprecation, ArrayExpress migration to BioStudies, and processed-vs-raw decision matrix.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes pooled CRISPR screens with MAGeCK (Li et al 2014), covering count generation (mageck count), the RRA two-condition workflow (mageck test using alpha-RRA over per-sgRNA negative-binomial p-values), the MLE multi-condition workflow (mageck mle with explicit design matrix and beta-score output), normalization choice (median vs total vs control-sgRNA vs spike-in), sgRNA efficiency injection, paired-sample testing, time-course design, drug-screen versus dropout-screen design matrices, MAGeCKFlute and MAGeCK-VISPR downstream visualization, and decision logic for when to use MAGeCK vs JACKS / BAGEL2 / drugZ / Chronos. Use when running a fresh CRISPR screen analysis, picking RRA vs MLE for the experimental design, choosing a normalization method from QC signatures, debugging MLE convergence failure or NaN beta scores, comparing MAGeCK output across tools, or building a batch-aware multi-cell-line / multi-condition MLE design matrix.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Query protein-protein and gene interaction databases (STRING, BioGRID, IntAct, SIGNOR, Reactome, HuRI, HuMAP, OmniPath, ConsensusPathDB, DIP). Use when building PPI networks, choosing between physical vs functional vs genetic interactions, signed/directed vs undirected, high-throughput vs curated, picking confidence thresholds, aggregating across resources, or navigating license constraints. Encodes the database decision matrix, STRING v12 channel semantics, OmniPath as meta-database, SIGNOR for signed signaling, and per-resource rate limits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Applies ACMG/AMP 2015 framework with ClinGen SVI specifications, Tavtigian 2018/2020 Bayesian point system, Abou Tayoun 2018 PVS1 decision tree, Pejaver 2022 calibrated PP3/BP4 thresholds for REVEL/BayesDel/AlphaMissense, Brnich 2020 PS3/BS3 OddsPath, Walker 2023 SpliceAI splicing framework, and AMP/ASCO/CAP 2017 tumor tiers. Use when classifying germline variants P / LP / VUS / LB / B, applying VCEP-specific CSpec rules, computing Whiffin BS1, or assigning cancer Tier I-IV per Li 2017.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extracts and assigns COSMIC v3.4 mutational signatures (84 SBS / 11 DBS / 18 ID / 24 CN / 16 SV) from somatic VCFs using SigProfilerSuite, MutationalPatterns, MuSiCal mvNMF, SigNet, or HRDetect. Use when characterizing DNA-damage etiology (BRCA1/2 HRD, MMR-D, POLE, APOBEC3A, UV, tobacco, aflatoxin, 5-FU/SBS17b, platinum, colibactin SBS88), routing PARP inhibitor decisions, or auditing de novo extraction vs refit choice for cohort size.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prioritizes rare-disease variants from trio/quad WES/WGS with de novo (DeNovoGear, Triodenovo), compound-heterozygous phasing (WhatsHap), mosaic VAF tiering, phenotype-driven ranking (Exomiser, Phen2Gene, AMELIE), ClinGen gene-disease validity gating, and ACMG SF v3.2 secondary findings reporting. Use when running diagnostic exome / genome pipelines, identifying candidate Mendelian disease genes, screening for incidental findings, or auditing VUS reclassification cycles. The ACMG/AMP classification framework (PVS1 decision tree, Pejaver PP3/BP4 calibration, Tavtigian point system) is in clinical-databases/acmg-classification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates 3D conformer ensembles using RDKit ETKDGv3 with knowledge-enhanced distance geometry, MMFF94/UFF force-field optimization, CREST + GFN2-xTB semi-empirical refinement, and macrocycle-aware torsion preferences. Provides explicit decision rules for single vs ensemble conformer use, RMSD pruning, energy windows, conformer count, and force-field choice. Use when preparing 3D ligands for docking, generating descriptor input for 3D QSAR, or sampling macrocycle/peptide conformational ensembles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes alternative splicing at single-cell resolution. The first decision is library chemistry — 10X 3' is fundamentally limited (RT primes from poly-A, R2 falls in 3' UTR, <0.1 junction read per cell per AS event). Plate-based full-length methods (Smart-seq3, FLASH-seq, VASA-seq, STORM-seq) and single-cell long-read (MAS-Iso-seq, scISOr-Seq2) are the chemistries that give per-cell isoform structure. Tools include MARVEL (R, Smart-seq integrated), BRIE2 (Bayesian PSI with regulatory features and ELBO_gain test), scQuint (junction-cluster, plate-based; not for 10X), SpliZ (annotation-free Z-score), Psix (graph-smoothness regulated AS), and Sierra (alternative polyadenylation, often confused with AS). Use when analyzing isoform usage in scRNA-seq, identifying cell-type-specific splicing, or determining whether scRNA-seq chemistry supports splicing analysis at all.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Combine React's official "You Might Not Need an Effect" guidance with this project's stricter no direct useEffect stance. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React components that might reach for useEffect, derived state, event relays, reset logic, subscriptions, or client fetching.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases ("grill me", "grill with docs").

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

API design principles and decision-making. REST vs GraphQL vs tRPC selection, response formats, versioning, pagination.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design, audit, and improve analytics tracking systems that produce reliable, decision-ready data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A hybrid memory system that provides persistent, searchable knowledge management for AI agents (Architecture, Patterns, Decisions).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interactive Flutter Widget implementation assistant that guides you through widget implementation decisions by asking structured questions about state management, widget type (screen/component), and state sharing. Use this skill when you need help determining the appropriate Flutter widget architecture for your implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Play Pokemon games autonomously via headless emulation. Starts a game server, reads structured game state from RAM, makes strategic decisions, and sends button inputs — all from the terminal.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create and train AI learning plugins with AgentDB's 9 reinforcement learning algorithms. Includes Decision Transformer, Q-Learning, SARSA, Actor-Critic, and more. Use when building self-learning agents, implementing RL, or optimizing agent behavior through experience.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produce a deterministic, read-only evidence map of the repository for SDD Composy (languages, manifests, commands, modules, boundaries, staleness) and publish the context bundle only on request. Use before a PRD or TechSpec, or when the map is stale — 'mapear o repositório', 'atualizar o contexto do código', 'what does this codebase look like for SDD'. Do NOT use for architecture decisions, code review, or repository exploration without an SDD workspace.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produce an evidence-backed release readiness opinion while keeping the human release decision separate.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks about the pwdev-prd audit trail — 'auditoria do prd', 'eventos', 'decisões registradas', 'audit report', 'exportar relatório de auditoria' — querying the shared SQLite database read-only (summary, events, decisions, artifacts, stats, export, query).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assess release readiness from applicable criteria, all current defects, risks, limitations, and recorded human decisions without approving release.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants a small, well-bounded change done now without a plan file — a bugfix, config change, rename, doc update or simple refactor touching 1–5 files — 'corrigir rapidinho', 'quick fix no X', 'renomear Y'. Presents a mini-plan, implements after approval, verifies and commits. Do NOT use for more than 5 files, architectural decisions, migrations or new UI flows (use feat-feature / feat-backend / feat-frontend).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants the existing codebase analyzed for planning — 'mapear o código', 'analisar o projeto', 'atualizar o contexto', 'map codebase' — or when a planning skill reports a missing or stale map. Runs a deterministic read-only evidence scan and writes codebase.md plus the architecture, conventions, testing and concerns context documents under .planning/feat/. Do NOT use for code review (feat-review), architecture decisions, or writing the project instructions file (feat-setup).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.