'accuracy' 검색 결과

Use when reviewing a README for accuracy, usability, and alignment with the actual repository. Detects invented content, broken setup steps, and structural issues.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Code comment accuracy verification, documentation completeness assessment, comment rot detection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Code comment accuracy verification, documentation completeness assessment, comment rot detection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[Research] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for knowledge artifact review: completeness, citation accuracy, confidence and template compliance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Runs an autonomous experiment loop on any programming task: you define the goal, metric, and eval command; the agent edits code, measures, and keeps or discards each change until interrupted. Use when optimizing a measurable target (speed, accuracy, size, score) by iteration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use after completing any non-trivial task. The agent self-rates its output on 5 axes — accuracy, completeness, clarity, actionability, conciseness — with concrete evidence per criterion. Produces a structured 1-5 scorecard with specific improvement suggestions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Open the alpha review screen to mark judge keepers as gold or miss, read per-miner precision, and print the eval state. Use when tuning a miner's accuracy. Thin launcher over the existing harvest engine and local review server. Triggers: "/alpha-review", "alpha screen", "open the review screen".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verifies truthfulness, accuracy, and link integrity of content before publishing. Catches fabricated statistics, dead URLs, misattributed sources, and company claims that contradict the brand DNA.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts output tokens 65% (measured) by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turns sustainability or ESG reports the user provides into a DRAFT question pack for reviewers: every quantitative disclosure as stated with unit, period, boundary and page, year-over-year changes computed only from the stated figures with the arithmetic shown, targets with stated and computed progress, restatements and inconsistencies, gaps and specific questions to the report owner. No assurance, accuracy or conformance verdict. Use when the user asks to "prepare review questions on our sustainability report", "what changed year on year in this ESG report", "check the figures in this report before it goes to the board", "find the gaps in this ESG disclosure" or "build a question pack for the report owner". Do not use for reviewing marketing text against environmental-claim rules, use green-claims-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Autonomous AI agent benchmark evaluation register: task completion rates, planning accuracy, tool invocation precision, and cost benchmarks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Mouse Precision Editing Tools for AI Coding Agents HIC Mouse gives AI coding agents precision file editing tools 56% higher accuracy, 58% lower cost,

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan, execute, and document validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP <1220>/<1225>/<1226>, ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays whenever the question is whether a procedure is fit for its intended purpose. Triggers include "method validation", "analytical method validation", "AMV", "validation protocol", "acceptance criteria", "linearity", "reportable range", "accuracy and precision", "repeatability", "intermediate precision", "recovery", "LOD", "LOQ", "detection limit", "quantitation limit", "specificity", "robustness", "method transfer", "method comparison", "Deming", "Passing-Bablok", "Bland-Altman", "equivalence testing", "OOS investigation", "ICH Q2", "Q2(R2)", "Q14", "USP 1225", "ICH M10", "incurred sample reanalysis", "ISR", "CLSI EP", and any request to show that an assay works.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Trains and fine-tunes vision models for object detection (D-FINE, RT-DETR v2, DETR, YOLOS), image classification (timm models — MobileNetV3, MobileViT, ResNet, ViT/DINOv3 — plus any Transformers classifier), and SAM/SAM2 segmentation using Hugging Face Transformers on Hugging Face Jobs cloud GPUs. Covers COCO-format dataset preparation, Albumentations augmentation, mAP/mAR evaluation, accuracy metrics, SAM segmentation with bbox/point prompts, DiceCE loss, hardware selection, cost estimation, Trackio monitoring, and Hub persistence. Use when users mention training object detection, image classification, SAM, SAM2, segmentation, image matting, DETR, D-FINE, RT-DETR, ViT, timm, MobileNet, ResNet, bounding box models, or fine-tuning vision models on Hugging Face Jobs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validate documentation before merging - check completeness, broken links, code example accuracy, and factual correctness. Use when reviewing docs for quality gates or running pre-merge doc validation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Normalizes documentation and examples for consistency in style, format, and accuracy. Ensures code matches existing patterns and documentation. Use when reviewing docs, examples, or writing new code that should follow established patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.