'downstream' 검색 결과

Identify differentially bound regions across CLIP-seq conditions (knockdown vs control, treatment vs vehicle, disease vs healthy) using DEWSeq (sliding-window DESeq2), Flipper (Skipper-downstream), ASpeak, edgeR, or limma-voom. Use when computing condition-level changes in RBP binding intensity, choosing peak-level vs window-level vs crosslink-level testing, designing replicate experiments, or distinguishing biological binding shifts from technical confounders.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reads, writes, and converts molecular file formats (SMILES, InChI, SDF V2000/V3000, MOL2, PDB, MMTF) using RDKit and Open Babel with rigorous handling of aromaticity perception, stereochemistry, implicit/explicit hydrogens, kekulization, and salt/fragment separation. Use when loading chemical libraries, debugging parse failures, or preparing molecules for downstream standardization, descriptor calculation, or docking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects allele-specific transcription factor or histone modification binding from heterozygous-variant ChIP-seq using WASP (reference-bias filter; mandatory upstream), RASQUAL (joint QTL + bias-corrected testing), BaalChIP (Bayesian beta-binomial with copy-number-aware overdispersion), and AlleleSeq (personalized diploid genome). Handles imprinted-locus awareness, X-inactivation artifacts, cancer copy-number imbalance, and integration with downstream caQTL / bQTL mapping. Use when identifying variants with allelic effects on TF binding, fine-mapping causal regulatory variants, validating deep-learning variant predictions, or characterizing cis-acting regulatory effects.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assesses ChIP-seq quality across antibody specificity, fragmentation, enrichment, replicate concordance, and library complexity. Computes FRiP, NSC/RSC (phantompeakqualtools), library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), deepTools plotFingerprint (JS distance, AUC, synthetic JS), ChIPQC, IDR with ENCODE Nself/Nt rules, and detects hyper-ChIPable artifacts. Use when validating an antibody, diagnosing failed peak calls, deciding whether to proceed with downstream analysis, grading against ENCODE thresholds, or auditing replicate concordance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Segments the genome into chromatin states from combinatorial histone modification and chromatin factor ChIP-seq data. Uses ChromHMM (multivariate HMM on binarized signal, v1.27), Segway (Dynamic Bayesian Network on continuous signal), EpiSegMix (flexible-distribution HMM with duration modeling, 2024), EpiLogos (multi-biosample visualization), IDEAS (cell-type-aware joint), and full-stack ChromHMM (Vu Ernst 2022) for cross-cell-type segmentations. Handles state-count selection (15 vs 18 vs 25 states), binarization choice, OverlapEnrichment / NeighborhoodEnrichment downstream analysis, and cross-biosample integration. Use when learning chromatin states from a histone mark panel, characterizing learned states by genomic feature enrichment, or comparing chromatin landscapes across cell types.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Trim multiple sequence alignments using ClipKIT, trimAl, BMGE, Divvier, or HMMcleaner with mode selection guidance per downstream goal. Use when removing unreliable columns or contaminating residues before phylogenetic inference, HMM building, or selection analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detect allele-specific chromatin accessibility from ATAC-seq using WASP, GATK ASEReadCounter, or RASQUAL. Use when mapping cis-regulatory genetic variants from heterozygous SNPs, separating cis from trans regulation, building chromatin QTL (caQTL) maps, validating GWAS variant function with allelic imbalance, or detecting reference allele mapping bias before downstream analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a differential-ready consensus peakset from per-replicate ATAC-seq peaks using iterative overlap removal, fixed-width re-centering, and majority-rule overlap. Use when generating a stable peak coordinate system for downstream differential accessibility, ML feature engineering, cross-sample comparison, or fixed-width peak counts; covers Corces 2018 iterative overlap (501 bp), DiffBind summit re-centering, and ENCODE consistency rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Call accessible chromatin regions from ATAC-seq BAM files using MACS3, MACS2, Genrich, or HMMRATAC. Use when identifying open chromatin from aligned ATAC-seq, choosing between point-source vs HMM peak callers, applying ENCODE-style pseudoreplicate IDR, removing blacklist regions, or fixing 501bp consensus peaks for downstream differential analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Parse and analyze multiple sequence alignments using Biopython. Extract sequences, identify conserved regions, analyze gaps, work with annotations, and manipulate alignment data for downstream analysis. Use when parsing or manipulating multiple sequence alignments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Perform multiple sequence alignment using MAFFT, MUSCLE5, ClustalOmega, or T-Coffee. Guides tool and algorithm selection based on dataset size, sequence divergence, and downstream application. Use when aligning three or more homologous sequences for phylogenetics, conservation analysis, or evolutionary studies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think through the consequences of consequences — not just what happens immediately, but what happens next, and next after that, across time. Load when a decision looks obviously good or obviously bad on initial read, when the user is optimising for a short-term outcome that might create a long-term problem, when unintended consequences are a concern, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a second-order frame. Triggers on "what are the downstream effects", "what happens after that", "unintended consequences", "think ahead on this", "long-term vs short-term", or "what comes after that". Based on Howard Marks second-level thinking and Farnam Street mental models. Most powerful for decisions with delayed consequences or systemic effects.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Decompose tasks into structured, outcome-defined process entries with complexity triage. Load when user says "decompose this", "break this down", "what steps do I need", "plan this out", "what's the process for", "how do I approach this", or when any complex task needs structured execution planning. Includes a problem-understanding pass before complexity triage. Routes to `problem-to-plan` when the user needs planning deliverables (spec + plan + TODO). Does NOT replace brainstorming — brainstorming is design approval (upstream), this is execution planning (downstream).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Query and filter Datadog logs from the shell using the Composio CLI. Run scoped log searches, pivot across services/environments, and export structured JSON for downstream agents instead of click-driving the Datadog UI.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identify tumor neoantigens from somatic variants with pVACtools (pVACseq/pVACfuse/pVACbind/pVACvector/pVACview) for personalized cancer vaccines and checkpoint biomarkers. Encodes the field's hard truth that binding prediction is the easy, near-solved part and single-digit-percent PPV lives downstream — so it centers clonality/CCF, HLA LOH (the silent invalidator), expression, proximal-variant phasing, agretopicity/foreignness quality, and the predicted->presented->immunogenic validation tiers. Use when nominating vaccine targets, ranking neoantigens, or building a tumor-to-candidate pipeline. Binding details in mhc-binding-prediction; ranking in immunogenicity-scoring.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Segment single cells from multiplexed IMC/MIBI tissue images using Mesmer/DeepCell, Cellpose, or ilastik+CellProfiler, covering whole-cell vs nuclear segmentation, the summed-membrane-channel decision, nuclear-expansion bias, lateral spillover, resolution-floor parameters, and downstream-proxy evaluation. Use when delineating cells after preprocessing, choosing a segmentation model, building a cell mask for quantification, diagnosing impossible double-positive populations, or troubleshooting over/under-segmentation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs genomics experiments so technical nuisance variation (batch, lane, plate, flow cell, operator, reagent lot, processing day) is balanced against the biological variable of interest and therefore estimable rather than confounded, using constrained sample-to-batch assignment (designit, OSAT), the confounder/mediator/collider distinction, and the principle that no post-hoc correction recovers a fully confounded design. Covers detecting hidden batches with surrogate variable analysis, a decision table for downstream correction (ComBat-seq, RUVSeq, SVA) whose execution is deferred to differential-expression/batch-correction, and reproducibility metadata. Use when assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates, avoiding batch-condition confounding, deciding whether a design is salvageable by correction, choosing a correction method, or estimating the number of hidden batches. For the experimental unit, randomization, and blocking concepts see experimental-design/randomization-blocking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Aligns sample metadata with count matrices and constructs design matrices for downstream DE, handling the alphabetical-reference-level trap (relevel BEFORE DESeq), LRT reduced-model rules, the interaction-term resultsNames trap, continuous-covariate scaling and splines, repeated measures via duplicateCorrelation or dream, high-cardinality categorical pseudo-singular designs, sample swap detection via XIST/RPS4Y1 expression and somalier/NGSCheckMate genotypes, SABV (sex-as-biological-variable) mandate, Simpson's-paradox collapsing of technical replicates, and the `~ 0 + group` parameterization for clean contrasts. Use when building a design matrix, troubleshooting reversed fold-change direction, encoding paired or repeated-measures designs, detecting sample swaps, deciding sex-as-covariate, or aggregating technical replicates.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs and analyzes in vivo CRISPR screens in animal tumor models, organoids, and immune-cell adoptive transfers. Covers bottleneck math (250x cells/sgRNA requires ~25M cells implanted; impossible for most syngeneic models, forcing focused libraries), focused library design (Manguso 2017 Nature 547:413 immune screen; Chen 2015 tumor screens), CRISPR-StAR intrinsic-control screening (Uijttewaal 2025 Nat Biotechnol 43:1848), clonal-dynamics-limited detection, tumor-explant DNA recovery, syngeneic vs xenograft vs PDX considerations, and the relationship to downstream MAGeCK / drugZ analysis. Use when designing in vivo CRISPR screens for tumor / immune / metastasis biology, choosing focused vs genome-wide for animal models, addressing bottleneck-induced clonal collapse, picking the syngeneic / xenograft / PDX model, integrating in vivo with in vitro results, or applying CRISPR-StAR for animal experiments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cross-method decision tree for calling hits in pooled CRISPR screens. Catalogs statistical models (MAGeCK RRA, MAGeCK MLE, BAGEL2, drugZ, JACKS, Chronos, CERES), experimental designs each is built for, failure modes outside design domain, reconciliation when methods disagree, multiple-testing and effect-size thresholds, the order of operations (count -> QC -> CN-correct -> hit-call -> validate), the second-best-sgRNA conservative rule, and consensus-hit strategy. Use when choosing among MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / drugZ / JACKS / Chronos for a given design, reconciling disagreement across two or three methods on the same screen, deciding whether to require consensus, gating downstream validation by hit-confidence tier, or interpreting unstable hit lists across reruns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Runs JACKS (Joint Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Screens; Allen et al 2019 Genome Research) which models per-sgRNA log-fold-change as the product of a treatment-dependent gene-essentiality term and a treatment-independent guide-efficacy term. Covers the Bayesian decomposition math, the hierarchical efficacy prior shared across screens performed with the same library, when JACKS outperforms MAGeCK (multi-screen joint analysis, libraries with broad efficacy variance) and when it does not (single screen, novel libraries with no prior efficacy), library-reuse efficacy transfer, downstream essentiality interpretation, and the 2.5x sample-size reduction enabled by efficacy-aware testing. Use when running multiple screens with the same library, when guide-level noise is suspected to dominate per-gene signal, when reusing published essentiality reference screens for efficacy priors, or when comparing screens performed across cell lines that share library but differ biologically.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes pooled CRISPR screens with MAGeCK (Li et al 2014), covering count generation (mageck count), the RRA two-condition workflow (mageck test using alpha-RRA over per-sgRNA negative-binomial p-values), the MLE multi-condition workflow (mageck mle with explicit design matrix and beta-score output), normalization choice (median vs total vs control-sgRNA vs spike-in), sgRNA efficiency injection, paired-sample testing, time-course design, drug-screen versus dropout-screen design matrices, MAGeCKFlute and MAGeCK-VISPR downstream visualization, and decision logic for when to use MAGeCK vs JACKS / BAGEL2 / drugZ / Chronos. Use when running a fresh CRISPR screen analysis, picking RRA vs MLE for the experimental design, choosing a normalization method from QC signatures, debugging MLE convergence failure or NaN beta scores, comparing MAGeCK output across tools, or building a batch-aware multi-cell-line / multi-condition MLE design matrix.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reconstruct ancestral states at internal phylogenetic nodes for sequences (PAML codeml, IQ-TREE --ancestral, GRASP, FastML), discrete traits (corHMM hidden-rate Markov, ape::ace, phytools::make.simmap stochastic mapping, BayesTraits), and continuous traits (phytools::fastAnc, geiger Brownian/OU, RPANDA). Use when designing constructs for ancestral protein resurrection, tracing trait evolution along a tree, performing stochastic character mapping, testing models of trait evolution (BM vs OU vs EB), inferring ancestral genome content via Dollo or DTL reconciliation, or quantifying ancestral-state uncertainty for downstream comparative analyses.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identify differentially bound regions across CLIP-seq conditions (knockdown vs control, treatment vs vehicle, disease vs healthy) using DEWSeq (sliding-window DESeq2), Flipper (Skipper-downstream), ASpeak, edgeR, or limma-voom. Use when computing condition-level changes in RBP binding intensity, choosing peak-level vs window-level vs crosslink-level testing, designing replicate experiments, or distinguishing biological binding shifts from technical confounders.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.