448건 · 관련도순
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review a GitHub pull request from multiple perspectives in parallel, output only findings, then let the user pick which to fix in the same session. Use when the user asks to review a PR by number, mentions "PRレビュー" / "PR review" with a number, or invokes `/pr-review <number>`. Fans out subagents for absolute-rules, stop-slop, security, architecture, code-quality, testing, and ai-antipattern.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Spatial depth design with isometric views, vanishing points, and layered elements that guide attention through 3D-like realism.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluate an interface from a UX perspective, assessing hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with evidence-linked judgments and actionable feedback. Use when the user wants an overall design or UX review—not when the main need is measurable accessibility/performance diagnosis, or final micro-detail polish.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write comprehensive end-to-end tests that verify complete user workflows, integration between components, and system behavior from user perspective using Playwright, Cypress, or similar frameworks. Use when testing user flows, verifying feature integration, testing across real browsers, ensuring UI interactions work correctly, validating form submissions end-to-end, testing authentication flows, catching regressions, automating QA processes, testing API integrations, or building confidence in production deployments.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Route communication modes, learning workflows, retrospectives, output discipline, and perspective shifts to focused productivity skills.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-agent exploration and task delegation for complex areas of interest. Use when you need to deeply explore a codebase area, gather information from multiple perspectives, or delegate parallel research tasks for comprehensive analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build the smallest, highest-signal context package for an AI coding task — goal, constraints, repo facts, boundaries, and a verification plan. Load when prompts are underspecified, the agent is missing key files or decisions, the user says "use the right context", "here's the repo", or when work is drifting due to missing constraints. Also triggers on "context engineering", "gather context", "what do you need from me", "before you start". Not for cross-session continuity (use memory-startup/memory-recall).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Search Experience Optimization: reads Google SERPs backwards to detect page-type mismatches, derives user stories from search intent signals, and scores pages from multiple persona perspectives. Identifies why well-optimized pages fail to rank by analyzing what Google rewards for each keyword. Use when user says "SXO", "search experience", "page type mismatch", "SERP analysis", "user story", "persona scoring", "why isn't my page ranking", "intent mismatch", or "wireframe".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Routes general Convex requests to the right project skill. Use when the user asks which Convex skill to use or gives an underspecified Convex app task.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Comprehensive lateral movement tradecraft for authorized red team engagements covering credential-based movement (pass-the-hash, pass-the-ticket, overpass-the-hash), NTLM relay attacks (ntlmrelayx with PetitPotam, DFSCoerce, PrinterBug coercion), remote execution protocols (WMI, WinRM, DCOM, PsExec and alternatives), RDP session hijacking, and network pivoting through tunneling tools (chisel, ligolo-ng, SSH tunnels, SOCKS proxies). Provides operator-ready command sequences for mimikatz, crackmapexec/netexec, impacket suite, and evil-winrm with emphasis on OPSEC considerations, SMB signing bypass, and detection evasion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1021 (Remote Services), T1550 (Use Alternate Authentication Material), and sub-techniques. Includes defender-perspective detection guidance for blue team awareness and a rapid engagement cheatsheet for common lateral movement scenarios encountered during internal penetration tests and assumed-breach exercises.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.