'brownfield' 검색 결과

Brownfield onboarding — audits existing project artifacts for template format compliance (not just existence), classifies gaps by impact, and produces a numbered migration plan. Run this when joining an in-progress project or upgrading from an older template version. Distinct from /project-stage-detect (which checks what exists) — this checks whether what exists will actually work with the template's skills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Brownfield improvements — the full WDS pipeline in miniature for existing products

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Document brownfield projects for AI context. Use when the user says "document this project" or "generate project docs"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Migrates existing projects to GSD structure without rewriting history. Activates when user mentions "migrate to GSD", "adopt GSD", "convert project", "brownfield GSD", or wants to add GSD to existing work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Purpose: Standardize how stakpak designs and optimizes AWS architectures. Scope: Greenfield: design new infrastructure. Brownfield: analyze existing architectures and propose improvements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Same reverse-thinking method as dh:rt-ica (see dh:rt-ica or dh-glossary for the definition), but localizes any MISSING input to the affected task only, as a non-blocking information-completeness pre-pass before task decomposition and plan generation. Use when grooming backlog items, generating plans, decomposing tasks under uncertainty, or working in brownfield and refactor scenarios. Produces completeness summary (APPROVED-FOR-PLANNING, APPROVED-WITH-GAPS, or BLOCKED-FOR-PLANNING), missing input report with dependency mapping, required unblock actions, and planning annotations for downstream tasks. Use dh:rt-ica instead at the S2 implementation gate where missing inputs must halt execution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use on any core for first-run planning intake — Phase 0 runs the vendored BMAD-METHOD planning shelf, shared by every core, and Phase 1 (mining `04-prd.md` into intent records plus the Add-ons/sync-and-remote-entities decision) is full-stack-app's and pwa-app's shared procedure — identical mechanics, a different decision at step 5/8. Phase 0 also defines compressed intake, the path a user's explicit "just build it" choice takes on full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored, and copywriting cores: one batched round of questions in place of the shelf, writing a thinned archive at the same paths so Phase 1 (or, on copywriting, that core's own mining step), `ux-planner`, and the Re-entry pass all keep their documented source. Also use for the Re-entry pass, which mines new scope into additional intents without re-running the shelf, on any core with a module axis to add an intent to (full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored) — landing-page has none, so its own new-scope path runs through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s Correction Protocol instead. Invoked by the `planner` agent, which decides the path; don't run standalone. landing-page runs this skill's Phase 0 on first run, then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s own planning-intake section, that core's counterpart to this skill's Phase 1. copywriting runs this skill's Phase 0 the same way (full or compressed), then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-copywriting-loop`'s own planning-intake section into a what/audience/register brief — no module axis, so its own new-scope path runs through that loop's Correction Protocol rather than the Re-entry pass below. An authored core runs this skill's Phase 0, then `hedgehog-core-design`, then this skill's Phase 1 mining against the designed layer sequence. A brownfield adoption (`hedgehog-adopt`) never runs this skill's shelf at all — the drivers BMAD elicits are already settled facts of a repo that already exists.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automated brownfield codebase analysis with weighted keyword scoring, three-stream analysis, and design pattern recognition. Detects project type, frameworks, dependencies, architecture patterns, and generates comprehensive project profile.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Adopt govctl in an existing project. Discovers undocumented decisions, backfills ADRs/RFCs, annotates source code. Use when: (1) Project has no governance yet, (2) User mentions migrate, adopt, onboard, or brownfield

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when analyzing an existing TypeScript or JavaScript codebase to decide where and how to introduce Inngest. Covers repository discovery, framework and package detection, finding durability gaps in HTTP handlers, webhooks, cron jobs, queues, long-running jobs, AI agents, Agent Evals, polling loops, eval loops, and side-effect-heavy code, then producing and implementing an incremental integration plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze an existing codebase in parallel via 7 specialized mapper subagents. Outputs structured findings to docs/codebase/ for persistent cross-session context. Use when onboarding to a brownfield project or when reactive on-demand file reading is too slow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Route a vague Prisma Next prompt to the right specific skill. Use for "help me with Prisma Next", "what is Prisma Next", "explain Prisma Next", "I'm new to PN", "where do I start", "what can I do with Prisma Next", "what can I do next with Prisma", "just ran createprisma", "tour of Prisma Next", "Prisma Next overview", and comparison questions like "Prisma Next vs Prisma 7", "PN vs Drizzle", "PN vs Kysely", "PN vs TypeORM". Do NOT use when the prompt clearly matches a workflow skill — adoption / quickstart / first-touch orientation / brownfield introspection, schema / contract editing, migration authoring (db update / migration plan / migrate), migration review on deploy / concurrent migrations, queries / db.orm / db.sql / TypedSQL, runtime / db.ts / middleware wiring, build / Vite plugin / Next.js plugin, debug / structured error envelopes / PN-* error codes, or feedback / bug report / feature request — load that sibling skill directly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Brownfield onboarding — audits existing project artifacts for template format compliance (not just existence), classifies gaps by impact, and produces a numbered migration plan. Run this when joining an in-progress project or upgrading from an older template version. Distinct from /project-stage-detect (which checks what exists) — this checks whether what exists will actually work with the template's skills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cold-start brownfield reconnaissance — reconstruct the WHOLE game design from an existing codebase when there is no GDD yet. Optionally accepts a free-text game description, notes, or reference links to guide and enrich the scan. Use when the user wants to build the game design from the code, e.g. "create a GDD from this codebase", "reconstruct the design from our code — it's a roguelike deck-builder", "build a design doc from the existing project, here are some refs". Scans the project (engine auto-detected), extracts a system roster + dependency graph and content-type schemas / resources / entities into one passive .unikit/gamedesign/RECON.md, tags every fact provenance:extracted-from-code, and writes a mandatory Intent Gap for what code cannot know (pillars, fantasy, the "why"). Writes nothing else and calls no skill. STRICTLY whole-project cold-start — if a GDD already exists and the user wants a specific part investigated, use /unikit-gd-explore (code lens); to author the GDD use /unikit-gd-spec.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Document brownfield projects for AI context. Use when the user says "document this project" or "generate project docs"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a 3-leg evaluation against a newly released LLM. Leg 1 is trap questions with deterministic answers, leg 2 is an agentic orchestration task with a planted failure, leg 3 is a brownfield feature build in a real repo. Use when the user wants to vibe-check, test, evaluate, or compare a new frontier model, or mentions model-bench, model vibe check, or launch-day protocol.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.