'cis' 검색 결과

Maintain Composio's documentation site and record documentation decisions. Work on content, Fumadocs configuration, changelogs, automation prompts, and review guidance, including ADR-style records that capture decisions and their rationale.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Update Composio documentation content and changelogs
• Revise Fumadocs settings and documentation automation prompts
• Record or update documentation decisions

Work through founder decisions with 13 executive-role agents and 21 slash commands. Use focused questions or multi-role discussions to clarify tradeoffs, record decisions, and turn the outcome into a 90-day action plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing a hiring decision from several executive perspectives
• Examining pricing changes in a multi-role discussion
• Identifying priorities under cash runway pressure

Turn an approved decision into a 90-day execution plan with weekly milestones, named accountable owners, review meetings, dependencies, and risks. The plan preserves the decision’s success measures and criteria for stopping the work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turning an approved decision into a quarterly plan
• Assigning owners and weekly milestones
• Setting progress reviews and stopping criteria

Trace changes in a game design document to related architecture decision records, which explain technical choices. Compare their assumptions with the revised design, report which decisions need review, and guide updates to decisions and requirement links.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking architecture impact after changing game design
• Finding technical decisions based on outdated requirements
• Choosing whether to keep, revise, or replace a decision

Work through major choices such as changing jobs, moving, or choosing a partner using simple decision rules. Examine whether to decline an uncertain opportunity, compare equally viable options, and reserve time for decisions with lasting consequences.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Working through a major career or relocation decision
• Reconsidering a choice after a pros-and-cons list fails
• Comparing two equally viable options

Create ADRs, short records of architectural decisions, that explain what was chosen, why, and with what trade-offs. Choose among three formats and organize dates, status, numbering, and related links for future team members.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Recording why a database was chosen
• Preserving the rationale for a framework choice
• Documenting an authentication approach

Run a decision asynchronously — the memo, the silent-read window, the comment protocol, and the deadline that makes it land without a meeting. Use when asked to decide something async, replace a decision meeting with a document, run an Amazon-style written decision process, or when a decision keeps stalling in comment threads. Produces the decision memo plus the process wrapper: reader roles, response windows, comment-resolution rules, and the tie-breaker. For the document structure alone use decision-memo; this skill runs the process around it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Converts a double-precision Simulink system or subsystem to single precision using DataTypeWorkflow.Single (Fixed-Point Designer). The single conversion replaces all user-specified double-precision data types, as well as output data types that compile to double precision, with single-precision data types. Use this skill when converting Simulink systems to single precision, reducing memory usage of a Simulink system, optimizing for embedded targets. Do NOT use for standalone MATLAB .m code single conversion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

RAID log methodology with decision extraction from emails and meeting notes. Use when asked to identify risks, log assumptions, track issues, extract decisions from correspondence, create or update a RAID log, escalate a risk to an issue, assess project risks, validate or challenge assumptions, or capture scope-relevant decisions. Also triggers when the user pastes email chains and asks what decisions were made, or needs to find buried decisions and untested assumptions in correspondence. Trigger on: 'risk report', 'RAID log', 'what are the risks', 'what decisions were made', 'update the risk register', 'what assumptions are we making', 'what could go wrong', 'flag any issues', 'extract decisions from these emails'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Manages GDPR Article 22 rights related to solely automated decision-making and profiling, including identification of automated decisions, meaningful human oversight implementation, logic explanation requirements, and contestation mechanisms. Activate for automated decision, profiling, Art. 22, algorithmic decision, AI decision queries.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert in decision-making frameworks - systematic approaches to making better decisions under uncertainty. Covers decision criteria, reversibility assessment, stakeholder alignment, and decision documentation. Knows when to decide fast and when to deliberate. Use when "decision framework, how to decide, making a choice, tradeoff, should we, pros and cons, decision matrix, weighing options, " mentioned.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

健身私教 — 为客户设计、指导和推进个性化训练方案的专业工艺, 有别于团课教练、物理治疗师或运动队教练: (a) 训练方案设计与周期化 (线性 / 波动 / 板块周期化 Bompa & Haff; NSCA《力量训练与体能训练精要》行业圣经; Schoenfeld 肌肥大机制; Helms/Valdez/Morgan 肌肉与力量金字塔; 共轭训练法 Simmons/Westside; Starting Strength 线性渐进 Rippetoe; Renaissance Periodization 训练量地标 Israetel); (b) 动作评估与筛查 (FMS 功能性动作筛查 Gray Cook; NASM CEx 纠正性训练连续体 抑制-拉伸-激活-整合; 关节逐级方法 Cook/Boyle; 姿势与代偿模式识别; PAR-Q+ 与 ACSM 运动前筛查指南); (c) 教学与指令 (外部 vs 内部注意焦点 Wulf; 差异化学习 Schöllhorn; 约束导向方法 Davids/Renshaw; RIR/RPE 自动调节 Zourdos/Helms; 动机访谈在健身中的应用 Rollnick/Miller); (d) 营养指导的执业边界 (宏量营养素周期化; Precision Nutrition / ISSN 立场声明的循证建议; 边界: 私教提供一般性指导, 医学营养治疗需 RD/RDN 资质; 能量可用性与 RED-S Mountjoy IOC 共识); (e) 商业与客户管理 (客户留存与方案依从; 咨询与销售伦理; 线上教练平台与规模化 Goodman PTDC; 方案交付工具 TrueCoach/Trainerize/TrainHeroic; 课时定价模型; 独立教练 vs 健身房雇员); (f) 专项方向 (运动表现 CSCS; 纠正性训练 CES; 老年健身 SFN; 产前产后; 青少年 YSCA; 适应性 / 无障碍健身; 健美 / 形体; 力量举; 耐力运动 S&C)。诚实处理: 兄弟科学 vs 循证之争, 补剂行业利益冲突, 合成代谢激素使用现状 (诚实但不推广: 匿名调查约 30% 有经验男性健身者使用过 — 业内估, Kanayama/Pope/Hudson 记录健康风险, WADA 禁用清单用于竞技语境), 体型焦虑与进食障碍风险 (男性私教肌肉变形症, 正食症倾向, NEDA 负责任语言指南), 健身房掠夺性销售 (高压推销、误导性对比照、长约锁定), 执业边界违规 (私教诊断伤病或超范围开饮食处方), 线上教练认证造假 (周末速成、未经认可的认证)。不含: 物理治疗 / 康复治疗 (持照医疗职业), 不含: 团课教练 (Les Mills/Zumba/CrossFit 分馆教练 — 相邻但不同), 不含: 精英竞技运动教练 (团队项目周期化, 不同职业路径), 不含: 营养作为主业 (临床营养学需单独资质)。 (Personal Trainer — the craft of designing, coaching, and progressing individualized exercise programs for clients, distinct from group fitness instruction, physiotherapy, or sports coaching: (a) exercise programming and periodization (linear / undulating / block periodization per Bompa & Haff; NSCA Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning as industry bible; Schoenfeld on hypertrophy mechanisms; Helms/Valdez/Morgan Muscle & Strength Pyramids; conjugate method Simmons/Westside; Starting Strength linear progression Rippetoe; Renaissance Periodization volume landmarks Israetel); (b) movement assessment and screening (FMS Gray Cook; NASM CEx corrective exercise continuum inhibit-lengthen-activate-integrate; joint-by-joint approach Cook/Boyle; posture and compensation pattern identification; PAR-Q+ and pre-exercise screening ACSM guidelines); (c) coaching and cueing (external vs internal cueing Wulf attentional focus research; differential learning Schöllhorn; constraints-led approach Davids/Renshaw; RIR/RPE autoregulation Zourdos/Helms; motivational interviewing for adherence Rollnick/Miller adapted to fitness); (d) nutrition guidance within scope of practice (macronutrient periodization; evidence-based recommendations per Precision Nutrition / ISSN position stands; scope boundary: PT gives general guidance NOT medical nutrition therapy which requires RD/RDN credential; energy availability and RED-S awareness Mountjoy IOC consensus); (e) business and client management (client retention and programming adherence; consultation and sales ethics; online coaching platforms and scaling Goodman PTDC; programming delivery tools like TrueCoach/Trainerize/TrainHeroic; session pricing models; independent contractor vs gym employee dynamics); (f) specialization tracks (sports performance CSCS; corrective exercise CES; senior fitness SFN; pre/postnatal; youth YSCA; adaptive/inclusive fitness; bodybuilding/physique coaching; powerlifting/strength sports; endurance athlete S&C). Evidence-based practice as the core ethos: Schoenfeld/Krieger meta-analyses on volume-response, Helms systematic reviews on protein/resistance training, Brad Schoenfeld's MASS journal bridging research to practice, Menno Henselmans and Eric Helms as practitioner-researchers, Greg Nuckols Stronger By Science as translation layer. Chinese fitness industry context: rapid growth of personal training in commercial gyms (Keep/Lefit/Megafit chains), NSCA-CPT and ACE-CPT as dominant certifications alongside local CSFA (China Sport and Fitness Association) credential, '体适能' (physical fitness) as formal term, online coaching boom post-COVID, PT business models in tier 1-3 cities diverge sharply. Honest treatment of: bro science vs evidence-based d

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Concise communication mode. Cuts ~60-70% of output tokens while keeping natural, readable English. Drops filler, hedging, and pleasantries but maintains grammar and sentence flow. Elaborate on request -- ask for detail and get it, then auto-return to concise. Use when user says "concise mode", "be concise", "less verbose", or invokes /concise. Also triggers when user requests token efficiency with readability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Erzeugt aus einem Bestand offener und gefallener Entscheidungen einen strukturierten ASCII-Abhängigkeitsgraphen (maximal 100 Spalten) für das Terminal. Bewertet Knoten nach fünf festen Kriterien: sinnvoll, empfohlen, usertypisch (Richtung und decision-avatar-Konfidenz getrennt), zusammenpassend und widersprechend; Kanten tragen Beziehungstyp und Belegstatus. Deckt Blocker, Freischaltungen, Reihenfolgen und widersprüchliche Empfehlungen gnadenlos auf. Nutze diesen Skill bei "welche Entscheidungen hängen voneinander ab", "Abhängigkeitsgraph der Entscheidungen", "Entscheidungspfad visualisieren", "Widersprüche zwischen Entscheidungen prüfen", "Reihenfolge der Beschlüsse", /decision-path. NICHT nutzen, um Entscheidungen erst zu inventarisieren -- das macht decision-briefing; NICHT nutzen, um das empfohlene Gesamtkonzept zur Abnahme zu bündeln -- das macht decision-draw; NICHT für kompakte Fünfteiler- Einzelblöcke mit Optionen und Pro/Contra -- das macht decision-shot; NICHT für die Einzelfall-Erwägung mit Frameworks -- das macht decide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verdichtet gebündelte offene Entscheidungen zu EINEM zusammenhängenden, prosa-basierten Gesamtkonzept auf Basis aller empfohlenen Varianten. Zeigt, wie die Teilsysteme nach der Umsetzung konkret ineinandergreifen, statt den Nutzer durch Dutzende isolierte Einzelfragen zu zwingen. Der Nutzer nimmt das Bild als Ganzes ab oder gibt zielgerichtete Korrekturen, die automatisch in Einzelentscheidungen übersetzt und über decision-briefing Phase 4 ins Register zurückgeschrieben werden. Nutze diesen Skill bei "wie sieht das Ganze aus wenn wir allem zustimmen", "zeichne mir das Gesamtbild", "Gesamtkonzept der Entscheidungen", "decision draw", /decision-draw, "wie greifen die Systeme zusammen". NICHT nutzen, wenn Alternativen pro Einzelpunkt diskutiert werden sollen -- das macht decision-briefing; NICHT für den Abhängigkeitsgraphen -- das macht decision-path; NICHT für strukturierte Einzelblöcke mit Optionen und Pro/Contra (auch bei eng zusammengehörigen Gruppen) -- das macht decision-shot; NICHT zur Herleitung einer einzelnen Entscheidung -- das macht decide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

후보 탐색과 비교를 반복하며 근거와 판단을 추가 기록 방식의 장부에 남깁니다. 이전 결과와의 일관성과 재검증 결과를 확인하고 실거래나 운영 작업의 실행 조건을 명확히 합니다.

• 여러 차례 시도하며 후보를 비교할 때
• 판단의 근거를 기록할 때
• 새 정보로 이전 채택 후보를 재평가할 때

Create an Architecture Decision Record, a document for recording important design choices, with the next sequential number. It generates a Markdown template, registers the record in AgentDB, and links related decisions found through search.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Record the reasoning behind adopting a technology
• Start an ADR for an API or data model change
• Document an infrastructure decision

Write an architecture decision record, a document explaining a team's design choice. Capture the context, rejected alternatives, and future costs so newcomers can understand the reasoning, then review the draft before saving it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Recording an agreed architecture decision
• Preserving reasons for rejecting alternatives
• Explaining past design choices to new team members

Organize treatment decisions already supplied and verified by authorized licensed professionals into local JSON documents. Check document structure, source references, declared review status, and supplied dates to support documentation handoffs without making clinical decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Organize verified clinician-authored treatment records
• Check source references and missing documentation fields
• List checkpoint dates already supplied by clinicians

Design meeting schedules, weekly metric reports, and quarterly planning for growing companies. Clarify who makes decisions, assign owners to priorities, and structure written updates so teams can coordinate work and reserve meetings for issues needing discussion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Redesign meetings that fail to produce decisions
• Standardize weekly business metric reports
• Align quarterly priorities and resources across teams

Create an Architectural Decision Record, a document explaining a system design choice. Organize context, rationale, alternatives, benefits, drawbacks, and implementation notes in consistent Markdown that people can read and AI tools can parse.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Recording the reasons behind a system design choice
• Documenting rejected alternatives and trade-offs
• Sharing decision context with new team members

Set up and run kube-bench to check Kubernetes configuration against CIS security benchmarks. Select the appropriate benchmark and cluster components, then export JSON or JUnit results for automated pipelines and troubleshoot skipped checks or incorrect detection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Setting up kube-bench for the first time
• Selecting benchmark versions and scan targets
• Exporting JSON or JUnit results for CI

Plan technology strategy and engineering team growth with frameworks for technical debt, hiring, architecture decisions, and vendor evaluation. Use Python tools and decision templates to prioritize improvements, structure teams, and track engineering performance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Prioritizing technical debt reduction
• Planning hiring and engineering team structure
• Comparing technologies and vendors

Work through design or implementation choices one at a time, with concise context and clear alternatives. You can also review completed code change by change, recording decisions, approvals, and requested revisions in a final table.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Compare design choices one decision at a time
• Resolve implementation choices with recorded answers
• Review completed code in logical steps