'conform' 검색 결과

Swift 6.2 마이그레이션과 동시성 설계를 돕습니다. MainActor로 상태를 보호하고 데이터 경쟁 컴파일 오류, 프로토콜 준수, 고부하 계산의 명시적 백그라운드 실행을 다룹니다.

• 기존 앱을 Swift 6.2로 마이그레이션
• 데이터 경쟁 컴파일 오류 해결
• 고부하 계산을 백그라운드로 분리

Plan ISO 27001 information security audits, review evidence that security controls work, and document findings. The skill also helps classify failures, track corrective actions, and prepare documentation for certification audits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Planning an annual internal audit
• Reviewing evidence for Annex A controls
• Documenting findings and corrective actions

Review token contracts and the protocols that accept them for ERC20/ERC721 compliance, privileged controls, and unusual transfer behavior. Produces evidence-based risk assessments and prioritized fixes, with supply and holder analysis when deployed contract details are provided.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking ERC20/ERC721 implementations against their standards
• Reviewing support for tokens with unusual transfer behavior
• Assessing administrator powers and upgrade risks

Use when the user asks to run a full empirical / causal analysis in Python — by default in the style of an applied economics paper (AER / QJE / JPE / ReStud / AEJ) with DID / RD / IV / SCM / DML / matching, written-out estimating equation + identifying assumption, Table 1 / Table 2 / event-study figure / robustness gauntlet — OR in epidemiology / public health style (target-trial emulation, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE triplet, Mendelian randomization, KM/AFT survival, E-value sensitivity, STROBE/TRIPOD reporting) — OR in ML causal inference style (DML, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners, causal forest, Dragonnet/TARNet/CEVAE, BCF, CATE distribution, policy learning, conformal causal, fairness audit, causal discovery) — OR in distributional / gap-decomposition style (Oaxaca–Blinder `sp.oaxaca`, Kitagawa `sp.kitagawa_decompose`, DiNardo–Fortin–Lemieux `sp.dfl_decompose`, Gelbach `sp.gelbach`, Fairlie `sp.fairlie`, RIF / FFL `sp.rif_decomposition`, all reachable through the `sp.decompose` dispatcher). Also covers exporting multi-column regression tables to Word / Excel / LaTeX (Stata outreg2 / esttab / R modelsummary equivalent) and bundling an entire replication appendix into one .docx / .xlsx / .tex file. Triggers on keywords "StatsPAI", "statspai", "AER empirical analysis", "applied micro pipeline", "Table 1 balance", "event study", "first-stage F", "Oster bound", "honest_did", "spec_curve", "callaway_santanna", "dragonnet", "text as treatment", "outreg2 in Python", "regression table to Word/Excel", "sp.regtable", "sp.collect", "sp.paper_tables", "sp.feols", "summary_col", "modelsummary", "AER style table", "QJE style table", "epidemiology pipeline", "target trial emulation", "g-formula", "IPTW", "TMLE", "Mendelian randomization", "STROBE", "TRIPOD", "公共健康", "流行病学", "DML", "double machine learning", "causal forest", "meta-learner", "CATE", "conformal causal", "policy learning", "因果机器学习", "ML causal", "decomposition", "Oaxaca-Blinder", "Kitagawa", "DiNardo-Fortin-Lemieux", "DFL", "Gelbach", "RIF decomposition", "wage gap decomposition", "sp.decompose", "sp.oaxaca".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest + rdrobust + econml + causalml + matplotlib/seaborn. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step pipeline an applied economist or quantitative social scientist runs on every paper — (1) data cleaning, (2) variable construction & transformation, (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1, (4) statistical diagnostic tests, (5) baseline empirical modeling, (6) robustness battery, (7) further analysis (mechanism, heterogeneity, mediation, moderation), (8) publication-ready tables & figures. **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaffolding** — **Mode A — Epidemiology / public health** (target-trial emulation via `zepid` / hand-rolled `pandas`, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE doubly-robust triplet via `zepid` / `econml` / `lifelines`, Mendelian randomization via `pymr` / `mrtool` (or `rpy2` → `MendelianRandomization`/`TwoSampleMR`), KM / AFT / Cox survival via `lifelines`, E-value sensitivity, principal stratification — STROBE / TRIPOD reporting), and **Mode B — ML causal inference** (DML via `econml.dml` / `doubleml`, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners via `econml.metalearners` / `causalml`, causal forest via `econml.grf` / `causalml`, Dragonnet / TARNet / CEVAE neural causal via `causalml`, BCF via `pymc-bart` / `bcf-py`, matrix completion, CATE distribution + policy tree via `econml.policy` / `policytree-py`, off-policy evaluation, conformal causal via `mapie`, fairness audit via `fairlearn`, DAG learning via `causal-learn` / `cdt` / LLM-assisted). Prescribes which library to reach for at each step, shows the canonical code, and links to deeper `references/` files for variant-specific patterns. Use when the user asks for a **complete empirical analysis** in Python, wants to replicate an applied-economics paper from scratch, needs a reproducible workflow that is NOT opinionated on any single vertical package (contrast with StatsPAI), wants explicit control over every estimator and diagnostic, or asks "how do I write a full empirical pipeline in Python?". Also triggers when the user names a specific classical step in isolation — "winsorize at 1/99%", "run Breusch-Pagan", "build a Table 1 balance table", "do a placebo test", "event study plot", "mediation analysis" — and wants it wired into the broader pipeline. Mode A triggers on "target trial emulation", "IPTW", "TMLE", "Mendelian randomization", "STROBE", "公共健康", "流行病学". Mode B triggers on "DML", "double machine learning", "causal forest", "meta-learner", "Dragonnet", "BCF", "policy tree", "conformal causal", "fairness audit", "因果机器学习".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill to run a four-panel adversarial advisory review on any pull request that touches the OpenAPM specification artifact (docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-*.md), its inline / sidecar JSON Schemas (docs/src/content/docs/specs/schemas/*.schema.json), or the conformance fixture seed (tests/fixtures/spec-conformance/**). The panel fans out to four spec-ecosystem reviewers (swagger-openapi-editor, oci-distribution-editor, pkgmgr-registry-contract-editor, w3c-tag-architect), each running in its own agent thread, and a spec-editor synthesizer that produces a fold-now / defer-v0.1.1 / defer-v0.2 / reject list plus a ship decision keyed off a 1..10 shocked_meter scale. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE consolidated comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes folds, and renders a ship recommendation that the maintainer weighs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

EU AI Act (Regulation EU 2024/1689) compliance specialist. Use for AI system risk classification, provider/deployer obligations, GPAI model compliance, conformity assessments, bias and fairness testing, and AI governance programs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Use for audit planning and execution, nonconformity classification, CAPA verification, external audit preparation, or audit program management.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assess and operationalize implementation readiness for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act Annex III, including provider and deployer obligations, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration. Use when users say things like “we classified this as high-risk, what now?”, “build an EU AI Act readiness plan”, “assess our Annex III compliance gaps”, “what do providers/deployers of high-risk AI need to implement?”, “prepare for conformity assessment”, or “create a high-risk AI implementation roadmap.”

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create, validate, and enrich Open Knowledge Format (OKF) bundles — the open spec for representing organizational knowledge as markdown files with YAML frontmatter. Use when the user mentions 'OKF', 'Open Knowledge Format', 'knowledge bundle', 'OKF bundle', 'create a knowledge base for agents', 'validate OKF', 'convert to OKF', 'enrich knowledge docs', 'agent-readable knowledge', 'LLM wiki', 'knowledge catalog', 'kcmd', or wants to structure knowledge as markdown files for AI agent consumption. Also use when the user has a directory of markdown files and wants to make them interoperable or conformant with the OKF standard. Even for simple requests like 'make this folder OKF conformant' — the skill has critical structural rules the agent needs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conformal Geometric Algebra (CGA) for circles, spheres, and Möbius transformations

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Write accessible HTML, CSS, and JavaScript that conforms to RAWeb 1.1 (Luxembourg Web Accessibility Framework, based on EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1). Use when developing web interfaces, components, forms, navigation, or any front-end code that must meet Luxembourg accessibility law. Covers all 17 RAWeb themes with code-level guidance, accessible patterns, and anti-patterns. Default conformance target: Level AA.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Develop accessible mobile applications (iOS and Android) conforming to RAAM 1.1 (Luxembourg Mobile Accessibility Assessment Framework, based on EN 301 549 v3.2.1 / WCAG 2.1). Use when building native mobile apps, React Native, Flutter, or any mobile UI that must meet Luxembourg accessibility law. Covers all 15 RAAM themes with platform-specific code guidance. Default conformance target: Level AA.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit an existing Quarkus + LangChain4j project against this stack's agentic conventions — a read-only conformance or gap-analysis review. Use when the user asks to audit, review, check, assess, or validate a Quarkus project against the LangChain4j agentic conventions, or wants to know whether an existing project conforms to (or is ready to adopt) this stack. User-invoked only.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review clinical data models and APIs for HL7 FHIR conformance, terminology standards, interoperability, and clinical workflow correctness. Triggers: 'check FHIR compliance', 'review clinical data model', 'audit HL7 conformance', 'validate medical terminology codes'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

对网站进行全面 GDPR 合规审计。按照 10 个部分的检查清单（法律声明、 托管服务商、表单、新闻通讯、隐私政策、cookies 及横幅、 密码、跟踪器和受众测量、次级处理方及欧盟境外转移、权利收集的可及性） 对网站进行系统性观察，另附一项 22 项附录，再现 GDPR 第 13 条和第 14 条的要求。产出 结构化报告，包含整体合规水平、阻塞点 （风险 3）、需警惕点（风险 2）、优先建议 和技术说明。 该 skill 是工具无关的：它可通过自动导航 工具（Claude in Chrome、Cowork 或同类工具）运行，也可采用降级 复制粘贴模式。 触发词："audit RGPD site"、"audit site internet"、"vérifie ce site"、 "scanne ce site"、"audit conformité site"、"audite la conformité de [URL]"、 "audit cookies site"、"audit politique de confidentialité site"。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert-level complex analysis knowledge. Use when working with complex functions, holomorphic functions, Cauchy's theorem, contour integration, Laurent series, residues, conformal mappings, or analytic continuation. Also use when the user mentions 'holomorphic', 'analytic', 'Cauchy theorem', 'residue', 'contour integral', 'Laurent series', 'conformal map', 'Riemann mapping', 'Mobius transformation', 'harmonic function', 'entire function', or 'meromorphic'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when verifying a story or ticket implementation against its spec and acceptance criteria - per-AC verdicts with file:line evidence and proving tests, code reuse and design conformance, dead code, stale docs, comment discipline. Finds the spec from an explicit path, the ticket key in the branch name, or plan files - and asks rather than guessing. For defect-hunting code review use dotnet-techne-code-review instead. Keywords: story QA, acceptance criteria, spec conformance, AC coverage, definition of done, dead code check, reuse check, comment check, verify story, QA this branch.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to verify a story or ticket implementation against its spec - per-AC verdicts, code reuse and design conformance, dead code, then adversarial maintainer verification. Requires the qa/review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: story QA, acceptance criteria, spec conformance, AC coverage, QA this branch, verify story.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks for a phase-gated refactoring or redesign loop - session-blind workers map and trace the area, empirical probes precede the design, an approval gate guards implementation, and a conformance audit re-checks the branch after any design change. State persists in .episteme/DESIGN-<slug>.md. Requires the refactor agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: refactor loop, redesign, design gate, enumerate before design, conformance audit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Especialista em acessibilidade web para conformidade WCAG, implementação ARIA e design inclusivo. Use ao auditar sites para problemas de acessibilidade, implementar padrões WCAG 2.1 AA/AAA, testar com leitores de tela ou garantir conformidade ADA. Especialista em HTML semântico, navegação por teclado e compatibilidade com tecnologia assistiva.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reconstructed reference notes on US FAA approval guidance for airborne software and airborne electronic hardware, built from four public-domain sources (FAA Order 8110.49A, AC 20-115D, AC 20-152A, AC 00-69; documents dated 2017-07-21 to 2022-10-07, pinned 2026-10-12). Use for how FAA certification staff plan and conduct software reviews (certification liaison, desk versus on-site review, review planning agreements), how the level of FAA involvement (LOI) is picked and scored with the Appendix A worksheets, how software conformity inspection works (software part and installation conformity, ASE and ASI tasks, Form 8120-10), what AC 20-115D recognizes and how DO-178B processes and tool qualification transition to DO-178C/DO-330 (supplements, FLS, UMS, legacy software changes), and what AC 20-152A adds for airborne electronic hardware (simple versus complex custom devices, robustness and HDL code coverage, tool assessment, previously developed hardware, COTS IP, COTS devices, circuit board assemblies), and what AC 00-69 adds as best practices for change impact analysis, data and control coupling, and design-level error handling (best practices, not guidance and not a means of compliance). SCOPE LIMITS: FAA guidance only, and guidance is not regulation (ACs are acceptable means, not the only means); no RTCA DO-178C or DO-254, EUROCAE ED-12C or ED-80, supplement, or SAE ARP text, which are copyrighted and named only (see the avionics-signpost pack); no AC 00-72 (named, not packed); no DO-178C software-level objective tables; no EASA AMC 20-115D or AMC 20-152A content (use easa-rules); reflects the pinned source dates, not later FAA actions; synthesized reference notes, not legal advice and not a substitute for the source documents. LICENCE: Public Domain (US Government work, 17 U.S.C. 105).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turns corrective and preventive actions from NCRs, audit reports, action forms, minutes or a tracker into one DRAFT tracker: action as stated, source, owner, due date, evidence expected and status, with flags for overdue, unowned, undated, stale and closed-without-evidence items and one question per flag. Never closes, verifies, reassigns or re-dates an action. Use when the user asks to "build the CAPA tracker", "update the corrective action log from these audit reports", "which actions are overdue or have no owner" or "draft the chase notes for open actions". Do not use for writing up the nonconformity itself, use nonconformance-report-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Operational guide for the NV oOS Dictation desktop companion app (Tauri v2 + Rust, examples/nvoos-dictate) — build/run on Windows/MSVC, the local-first engine track (parakeet/whisper/fastconformer/moonshine/silero-vad), the embedded remote-STT fallback, the Stage-2 polish provider track (disabled/openai_compat/nvoos plus local LM Studio and Ollama), the file/media decode seam (Symphonia 0.5), the live camera + local object-detection/tracking track (Proposals 073 + 075) with an opt-in VLM label-polish layer (Proposal 076), the CDP browser-control agent (feature agent) + FastConformer engine + NV oOS multi-SPA hub, model registry + verification harnesses, the plugins.updater boot-crash config rule, and the full test/clippy gate matrix. Use when building, extending, or debugging the dictation app, adding an engine/model, a polish provider, the browser agent, file/video transcription, camera/vision detection, or VLM relabeling.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.