'consensus' 검색 결과

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[omh] High-stakes technical proposal needing approval: consensus planning with review gates. Use when the user says: ralplan, consensus plan, reviewed plan, issue to PR, acceptance criteria, verification command, reviewable PR, risky planning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[omh] Technical proposal facing adversarial scrutiny: independent perspectives attack a proposal, then distill into a bundle a separate planner consumes. Use when the user says: adversarial-consensus, adversarial planning, adversarial plan review, red team this plan, red-team this plan, red team the proposal, multi-perspective review, multiple perspectives.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze sell-side analyst estimates and how they are changing, using Yahoo Finance data (yfinance): EPS and revenue consensus by period, estimate ranges and dispersion, revision trends over 7/30/60/90 days and up/down revision breadth, growth estimates vs industry, sector, and the S&P 500, and historical estimate accuracy. Use this skill when the user wants more than a single estimate lookup: estimate revisions or momentum, EPS trend, consensus changes, forward or next-quarter and annual estimates, the bull vs bear estimate spread, or growth projections across periods.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a pre-earnings briefing for a stock from Yahoo Finance data (yfinance): the upcoming report date and timing, consensus EPS and revenue estimates with their range, the beat/miss track record, analyst ratings and price targets, and what to watch in the print. Use this skill whenever the user is preparing for an upcoming earnings report or asks what the street expects — consensus or whisper numbers, EPS expectations, whether a company will beat, an earnings setup, or an earnings-season preview — and whenever a ticker comes up in the context of upcoming earnings, even without the word "preview". For results that are already out, use earnings-recap.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates complete tumor immune-infiltration-guided bulk-transcriptome diagnostic biomarker and machine-learning research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, immune infiltration estimation, immune-linked module discovery, consensus feature selection, diagnostic modeling, nomogram construction, clinical association, and optional prognostic extension or validation. Covers five study patterns (immune-cell-first diagnostic workflow, immune-module-to-biomarker workflow, consensus-ML biomarker workflow, diagnostic-plus-prognostic hybrid workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, reference literature pack, and self-critical risk review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Multi-protocol consensus for agent swarms supporting Raft leader election, Byzantine fault tolerance, Gossip state propagation, and CRDT conflict-free merging.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Decides whether and how to polish a draft genome assembly to raise consensus accuracy (QV) with read-type-matched tools - Racon and medaka (ONT consensus), dorado polish, Polypolish and pypolca (Illumina, repeat-aware), Pilon (legacy short-read), NextPolish/NextPolish2, Hapo-G (haplotype-aware), ntEdit, and DeepPolisher/PEPPER-Margin-DeepVariant for human. Covers the do-not-polish-HiFi rule, the medaka basecaller-model footgun, held-out Merqury QV as the only honest stop signal, and the haplotype-collapse trap. Use when correcting homopolymer indels or residual SNPs in a long-read assembly, deciding if a HiFi assembly needs polishing, or choosing an ONT vs hybrid vs short-read polishing chain.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cross-method decision tree for calling hits in pooled CRISPR screens. Catalogs statistical models (MAGeCK RRA, MAGeCK MLE, BAGEL2, drugZ, JACKS, Chronos, CERES), experimental designs each is built for, failure modes outside design domain, reconciliation when methods disagree, multiple-testing and effect-size thresholds, the order of operations (count -> QC -> CN-correct -> hit-call -> validate), the second-best-sgRNA conservative rule, and consensus-hit strategy. Use when choosing among MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / drugZ / JACKS / Chronos for a given design, reconciling disagreement across two or three methods on the same screen, deciding whether to require consensus, gating downstream validation by hit-confidence tier, or interpreting unstable hit lists across reruns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a differential-ready consensus peakset from per-replicate ATAC-seq peaks using iterative overlap removal, fixed-width re-centering, and majority-rule overlap. Use when generating a stable peak coordinate system for downstream differential accessibility, ML feature engineering, cross-sample comparison, or fixed-width peak counts; covers Corces 2018 iterative overlap (501 bp), DiffBind summit re-centering, and ENCODE consistency rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate consensus sequences and manage reference files using samtools. Use when creating consensus from alignments, indexing references, or creating sequence dictionaries.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Answer a hard question by fanning it out to a PANEL of models running in parallel — each answering independently with web search and bash, none seeing the others' work — then having Opus 4.8 judge every response into a structured analysis (consensus, contradictions, partial coverage, unique insights, blind spots) and write a final answer grounded in it. The panel is two independent Opus 4.8 runs (slug opus4.8-4.8), Opus 4.8 + GPT-5.5 via codex (opus4.8-gpt5.5), Opus 4.8 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via agy (opus4.8-gemini3.1pro), or all three (opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro). Opus always judges and writes the final answer — the pipeline can't be reversed. Runs on local CLI subscriptions (no metered API), and saves a timestamped provenance .md per run. Use this whenever the user asks to "run it through Fusion", says /fusion, wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer, wants a question cross-checked across models, or wants a higher-confidence answer with consensus and blind spots surfaced — even if they don't say "fusion". General-purpose: any topic (research, law, strategy, technical, personal). Best for high-stakes research, design calls, and debugging where being confidently wrong is expensive.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Consensus cell type annotation: runs 10+ algorithms (KNN-Harmony/BBKNN/Scanorama/scVI, CellTypist, ONCLASS, Random Forest, SCANVI, SVM, XGBoost) on a labeled reference and transfers labels via majority voting. Outputs per-method labels, consensus, agreement score. Use when single-method annotation is insufficient or you need ensemble uncertainty for novel states.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Parallel multi-AI cross-validation research workflow (大版本). Dispatch N internal sub-agents + grok + gemini in parallel, automatically cross-validate findings, tier by confidence (strong consensus / partial / conflict / insufficient), generate tiered action items with arbitration. Use when user says "多 AI 调研", "交叉验证", "独立共识", "三脑调研", "multi-ai research", "parallel research", "cross-validate", or needs deep research that benefits from internal data + external 2026 consensus. NOT for quick factual Q&A, pure code reasoning, or tasks needing deep project context.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automatically generate TLA+ specifications from source code (C/C++, Python) for formal verification of distributed systems. Use when users need to: (1) Generate TLA+ specs from program implementations, (2) Model distributed systems, consensus protocols, or concurrent algorithms, (3) Extract state variables, actions, and invariants from code, (4) Create formal specifications for model checking with TLC, (5) Verify safety and liveness properties of distributed systems. Particularly effective for message-passing systems, replication protocols, consensus algorithms, and distributed transactions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Weekly product-level commercial tracking — TRx/NRx with current/4-wk/12-wk share and YoY, launch curves overlaid with same-class analogs plus a consensus-implied trajectory, LOE/biosimilar erosion series, GTN/net-price stress brackets, and per-row data-caveat discipline. Use to track any launched drug, biologic, device, or vaccine against its class and consensus.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a differential-ready consensus peakset from per-replicate ATAC-seq peaks using iterative overlap removal, fixed-width re-centering, and majority-rule overlap. Use when generating a stable peak coordinate system for downstream differential accessibility, ML feature engineering, cross-sample comparison, or fixed-width peak counts; covers Corces 2018 iterative overlap (501 bp), DiffBind summit re-centering, and ENCODE consistency rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Institution ratings, consensus price targets, EPS/revenue forecasts, finance calendar, shareholder data, fund holders, insider trades (SEC Form 4), short interest, industry rankings, peer group analysis via Longbridge. Frameworks: investment proposals, coverage initiation, stock research, competitive analysis, financial planning, and DeFi/on-chain analysis. Triggers: "机构评级", "目标价", "一致预期", "EPS预测", "内部人交易", "空头", "行业排名", "投资提案", "首次覆盖", "竞争格局", "财务规划", "DeFi收益", "链上数据", "機構評級", "目標價", "一致預期", "內部人交易", "空頭", "投資提案", "首次覆蓋", "競爭格局", "鏈上數據", "analyst rating", "price target", "consensus", "insider trades", "short interest", "coverage initiation", "DeFi yield", "on-chain", "earnings calendar", "finance calendar", "财报日历", "下周谁财报", "下周财报", "下周有哪些财报", "哪些财报", "谁财报", "FOMC", "非农", "股东", "谁持有", "股東", "基金持仓", "基金持倉", "機構評級", "目標價", "財務規劃"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Foundational impossibility result proving consensus cannot be guaranteed in asynchronous systems with even one faulty process

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Foundational distributed computing algorithms for consensus, coordination, and fault tolerance

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conversation patterns and interaction protocols for multi-agent systems. Covers request/response, pub/sub, blackboard, delegation chains, debate, critique, consensus, fan-out/fan-in, supervisor-worker, and peer negotiation. Deep analysis of AutoGen conversation patterns, CrewAI delegation, LangGraph state passing, and FIPA-ACL performatives. Teaches how to design what agents say to each other and in what order. Activate on: "agent conversation", "agent protocol", "multi-agent debate", "agent delegation", "supervisor worker pattern", "agent voting", "consensus protocol", "fan-out fan-in", "agent negotiation", "blackboard pattern", "agent dialogue", "conversation topology", "agent handoff". NOT for: wire format or serialization (use agent-interchange-formats), orchestration infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026), single agent behavior (use agentic-patterns).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.