36건 · 관련도순
Elicit and challenge data-analysis requirements before querying. Use when the user asks ambiguous data questions, requests business/report answers, needs metric definitions clarified, or may be drawing decisions from incomplete data.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guidelines for designing tools and action spaces for AI agents. Use when building agent harnesses, designing tool interfaces, creating elicitation mechanisms, or optimizing agent-tool interactions. Covers progressive disclosure, tool design patterns, and lessons from Claude Code development.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer Systems Analyst — running requirements elicitation and gap analysis against a target system, writing a feasibility study for a build-vs-buy-vs-customize decision, designing a system integration approach (point-to-point vs middleware vs API-led), scoping data-migration risk before a cutover, or choosing between phased and big-bang implementation strategies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when building, reviewing, or refreshing a RACI (Responsible / Accountable / Consulted / Informed) matrix for a Salesforce project so that every Salesforce-specific decision — data model change, automation tier choice, security model, integration boundary, deployment, license/edition — has exactly one accountable owner and a documented escalation path that downstream agents can route to. Trigger keywords: RACI matrix salesforce project, stakeholder authority salesforce, escalation path salesforce decisions, who approves data model change, salesforce decision rights, REFUSAL_NEEDS_HUMAN_REVIEW routing. NOT for the change advisory board operating model itself (use admin/change-management-and-deployment). NOT for end-user training rollout plans (use admin/change-management-and-training). NOT for the technical mechanics of permission set assignment authority (use admin/permission-set-architecture). NOT for pure stakeholder requirements elicitation (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). More trigger keywords: who approves a sandbox refresh, who signs off a data load, release update activation owner, delegated admin authority vs RACI, multi-org decision rights, escalation time-box.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when authoring INVEST-compliant Salesforce user stories from gathered requirements: shaping the As-A/I-Want/So-That stem, writing Given-When-Then acceptance criteria, sizing complexity (S/M/L/XL), splitting stories that are too large for a sprint, and emitting handoff metadata that names the next downstream agent. Trigger keywords: user story, INVEST, story splitting, story sizing, As-A I-Want So-That, story handoff, recommended_agents, backlog item shape. NOT for requirements elicitation or stakeholder interviews (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). NOT for the Given-When-Then technique itself in depth (use admin/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then). NOT for UAT test case design (use admin/uat-test-case-design). NOT for backlog prioritization (use admin/moscow-prioritization-for-sf-backlog).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Eliciting, documenting and structuring requirements for a Salesforce implementation: stakeholder discovery interviews, As-Is and To-Be process mapping, and gap analysis against standard Salesforce capability. Trigger keywords: requirements gathering, user story, As-Is To-Be, gap analysis, stakeholder interview, process mapping, business requirements, fit gap. NOT for authoring the user stories themselves - use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for scoring requirements against a specific org - use admin/fit-gap-analysis-against-org. NOT for technical design decisions - use architect/solution-design-patterns. Also covers the requirements catalogue itself (one row per requirement, MoSCoW priority, source stakeholder, downstream target) and Salesforce non-functional requirements: record volume, sharing layer, integration pattern, reporting joins, mobile/offline, and licence implication.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when scoring a list of business or solution requirements against the *actual* capabilities of a specific Salesforce org so each row can be classified Standard / Configuration / Low-Code / Custom / Unfit, given an effort tier (S/M/L/XL), a risk tag, and an AppExchange suggestion when applicable. Trigger keywords: fit gap salesforce requirements, score requirements against salesforce capabilities, salesforce capability matrix, classify requirement as standard config custom, fit-gap effort tier, AppExchange alternative for requirement. NOT for requirements elicitation (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). NOT for architecture decisions on the GAP rows (use architect/solution-design-patterns and standards/decision-trees/). NOT for license or edition selection (use architect/license-optimization-strategy and architect/org-edition-and-feature-licensing). NOT for OmniStudio-specific fit-gap (use architect/omnistudio-vs-standard-decision).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Methodology for eliciting expert knowledge about cognitive processes, decisions, and mental models in complex tasks
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when creating RFQ (Request for Quotation) documents for software development projects to send to vendors. Use this skill when you have received vague requirements from clients and need to structure them into clear, comprehensive RFQs that enable vendors to provide accurate estimates. Supports Japanese (default) and English, with systematic requirements elicitation, clarification, and markdown-formatted output.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Methodology for eliciting expert knowledge about cognitive processes, decisions, and mental models in complex tasks
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.