'enforcement' 검색 결과

Guides compliance with Japan's Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI, 2022 amendments). Covers individual rights expansion, cross-border transfer restrictions including pre-transfer information requirements, PPC enforcement, and pseudonymised and anonymously processed information. Keywords: APPI, Japan data protection, PPC, cross-border transfer, pseudonymised information, individual rights.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act (ICDPA) compliance. Effective January 1, 2025. Covers consumer rights (access, delete, opt-out), controller thresholds at 100,000 consumers, sensitive data opt-in consent, 90-day cure period, and AG-only enforcement. Iowa Code Chapter 715D.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

New Jersey Data Privacy Act (NJDPA) compliance, effective January 15, 2025. Covers consumer rights (access, correction, deletion, portability, opt-out), controller obligations, sensitive data requirements, universal opt-out mechanism recognition, 30-day cure period (sunsets after 18 months), and AG enforcement. Keywords: NJDPA, New Jersey, data privacy, consumer rights, sensitive data, universal opt-out, AG enforcement.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Methodology for auditing A/B testing of consent banners to ensure compliance with equal ease of acceptance and rejection. Covers CNIL enforcement patterns including the EUR 150M Google fine, dark pattern detection methodology, manipulative design identification, and regulatory-compliant experimentation boundaries.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Technical enforcement of GDPR Article 5(1)(b) purpose limitation principle. Covers purpose-tagged data stores, access control per purpose, Article 6(4) compatibility assessment factors, and system design for preventing purpose creep. Includes purpose binding architecture and compatibility test implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Activates Standard of Excellence enforcement for the current session. Load before starting any task to apply completion standards: finish the whole thing, fix the root cause, ship the complete working result. Blocks partial solutions, workarounds, deferred threads, and invented content limits when the permanent solve is within reach. Triggers: 'do the whole thing', 'boil the ocean', 'standard of excellence', 'finish it completely', before starting any implementation, refactoring, or multi-step task where partial output is a risk. Does NOT apply to: read-only queries, one-line typo fixes, pure knowledge questions, or single-output summarize requests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for SSR, template rendering, route loaders, hydration payloads, server-client render boundaries, and template-to-handler enforcement gaps. Use when the user asks to inspect SSR or template routes, trace render context or hydration data, compare template gating with handler enforcement, explain preview or hidden-route rendering, or connect render pipeline behavior to the decisive branch. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Documents the hook enforcement system, bypass mechanisms, and common failure patterns to help agents avoid getting stuck on protected path writes

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Configure Claude as a "Pair Hunter" — autonomous overnight hacking, context management via per-target .claudemd files, sub-agent compaction avoidance, and scope enforcement. Based on Critical Thinking Bug Bounty Podcast Episode 166.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produces an enforcement-aware Animal Welfare Act compliance audit for USDA/APHIS-regulated facilities. Maps Form 7002 inspection citations to verified 9 C.F.R. Parts 1-3 requirements, analyzes NCI severity and recurrence patterns, evaluates core compliance programs (PVC, IACUC, housing, records, transport), and outputs a prioritized corrective action plan with proof artifacts. Use when auditing AWA compliance, reviewing USDA inspection reports, preparing for license renewal, conducting diligence, or assessing enforcement risk. Trigger: Animal Welfare Act, AWA, USDA, APHIS, Form 7002, IACUC, PVC, exhibitor, dealer, research facility.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Oracle-bound spec-review check that every structured Rollout prerequisite binds to an enforcement-type acceptance criterion. A prerequisite whose `enforced-by` is missing, dangling, or points at a non-enforcement AC is a BLOCKER (hard-blocks implementation entry via the checker fan-out verdict); a prerequisite left in free prose is ADVISORY. Read-only. Runs in the spec-review fan-out before implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AID methodology phase gate enforcement. Ensures work follows correct 6-phase order (Discovery -> PRD -> Tech Spec -> Impl Plan -> Dev -> QA & Ship). Enforces gates, validates transitions. Use before any work to check the current phase and refuse work belonging to a later phase.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implement eBPF-based runtime security observability and enforcement in Kubernetes clusters using Cilium Tetragon for kernel-level threat Tespit and policy enforcement.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implements security controls at the API gateway layer including authentication enforcement, rate limiting, request validation, IP allowlisting, TLS termination, and threat protection. The engineer configures API gateways (Kong, AWS API Gateway, Azure APIM, Apigee) to act as a centralized security enforcement point that validates, throttles, and monitors all API traffic before it reaches backend services. Activates for requests involving API gateway security, API management security, gateway a...

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detect project tech stack and configure Claude Code hooks for mechanical enforcement of linting and security rules. Use this skill when a user wants to set up hooks, configure auto-linting, add security guards, or move from advisory CLAUDE.md rules to mechanical enforcement.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Show or change Peephole's enforcement mode (guided (default), audit, strict, hardened, off). Use when the user says /peephole, wants to see the current security mode, or asks to make enforcement stricter or looser.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audits an Articles of Agreement contract — the daemon-witnessed agreement every official Port Daddy agent signs covering registration, transcript reporting, tool-use gating, file claims, parley conduct, budget limits, and operator control — against the enforcement-beats-hope bar: a clause counts as safe only when it resolves to a concrete, daemon-observable mechanism with a defined denial shape, never a promise the agent might honor. Use when drafting a new agent's Articles, reviewing a compliance-level (C0-C6) claim, deciding whether a clause is genuinely enforced or merely documented, or auditing whether an agent's claimed identity can be trusted. NOT for securing the inbound event-to-spawn path (fleet-event-spawn-trust), designing the relay's transport PKI and signing keys (pd-relay-zero-trust), or tracking an agent's identity and reputation across its whole lifetime after it signs (agent-identity-continuity-reputation).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Claude Code에서 파일을 편집할 때 Plankton으로 자동 서식 정리와 코드 검사를 실행하도록 설정합니다. 남은 위반의 자동 수정과 재검사, 검사 규칙 보호도 다룹니다.

• 편집할 때마다 서식 정리와 코드 검사를 할 때
• 남은 검사 위반의 자동 수정을 설정할 때
• 검사 규칙이 완화되는 것을 막을 때

Build a shared animation foundation for React and Next.js with motion/react. Define reusable timing and spring settings, respect reduced-motion preferences, adapt to device performance, and align initial animation states with server-rendered content.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Standardize animation settings across components
• Define reusable spring animation presets
• Respect users' reduced-motion preferences

코드와 문서를 생성할 때 생략 주석이나 미구현 틀로 내용을 대신하지 않고 요청한 모든 항목을 출력하도록 합니다. 긴 출력은 중단점과 재개 위치를 표시합니다.

• 소스 파일 전체 받기
• 지정한 컴포넌트 한꺼번에 생성
• 긴 문서의 내용 생략 방지

명령줄에서 OmniRoute의 연결 제한, 사용 한도, 재시도 대기 상태를 확인합니다. 멈춘 연결 대상을 초기화하고 장애 임계값과 대기 시간을 조정합니다.

• 오류 발생 후 연결 제한을 조사합니다
• 멈춘 연결 대상을 초기화합니다
• 장애 임계값과 재시도 대기를 조정합니다

Set and review limits for bundled file size and page performance so CI, automated checks on code changes, can catch regressions. Check enforcement on pull requests and review production monitoring for slowdowns after release.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing performance limits in CI configuration
• Checking pull requests that add dependencies or assets
• Setting limits for file size and page performance

Review how tests use mocks, substitutes for external services or resources. Identify excessive mocking and missing cleanup, suggest more realistic tests, and check whether automated checks consistently catch problems and prevent regressions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing tests with too many mocks
• Checking mock cleanup between tests
• Improving realistic API mocks