883건 · 관련도순
Set up Cisco Duo multi-factor authentication for VPN, RDP, SSH, and web applications. Configure access rules based on users and device health, introduce security keys, and establish authentication monitoring and emergency access procedures.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build an OpenCTI pipeline that adds external context to indicators of compromise, such as suspicious IP addresses. Connect intelligence services, relate indicators to known attackers and campaigns, and score confidence to help analysts prioritize investigations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan user research by matching methods to study goals and explaining participant numbers and confidence. Synthesize tagged observations into recurring findings, distinguish isolated anecdotes, and organize evidence so research results can be found and reused.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prepare a confidentiality agreement for two parties using their details, the information being shared, and the governing jurisdiction. Receive a summary, a customizable draft, and plain-language notes identifying decisions and clauses that need legal review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Find people and assess identity matches using public information from social media, official records, and reverse lookups. The skill cross-checks independent sources, reports confidence levels, and requires at least three matching identifiers for a high-confidence result.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build probability estimates from historical frequencies and supporting or opposing evidence. Structure forecasts with explicit assumptions and outcome criteria, update them as evidence changes, and assess past predictions using accuracy and confidence calibration.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structure open-source intelligence research, meaning investigation using publicly available information, for authorized external assessments. Map organizational assets, record evidence and confidence levels, prioritize exposures, and prepare reports that explain technical findings and business risks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Check AI output before you trust or use it — where it's likely wrong, what to verify, and how to catch confident-sounding errors. Use when asked can I trust this AI answer, how do I verify what AI told me, fact-check this AI output, or is this AI response reliable. Produces a risk read on the specific output (the claims most likely to be wrong or made up), the parts that need independent verification vs the parts that are low-risk, how to actually verify each, the tells of AI hallucination and overconfidence, and a habit for building verification into your AI use — because AI is confidently wrong often enough that unchecked trust is a real risk.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
How to read experiment results without fooling yourself. Confidence intervals, p-values, multiple testing, sequential testing, CUPED, heterogeneous treatment effects, ratio metrics, network effects, dashboard reconciliation, and the interpretation failures that produce confidently wrong shipping decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is reading a finished experiment result panel and about to make a ship, kill, or iterate decision, or when an experiment number does not match the dashboard number. Triggers on read experiment results, result panel, ship or kill decision, p-value, confidence interval, statistical significance, multiple testing, peeking, sequential testing, CUPED, variance reduction, heterogeneous treatment effects, ratio metric, network effects, inconclusive test, experiment versus dashboard mismatch. Use `experiment-design` instead when the test has not run yet and the question is hypothesis, sample size, duration, or what to test.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when reviewing Java enterprise evidence for MiFID II investment services, investment activities, client classification, suitability, appropriateness, order-handling evidence, best-execution evidence, algorithmic-trading governance evidence, market-access governance evidence, transaction evidence, record keeping, monitoring, or compliance-owner handoff. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java investment-service platform for MiFID II evidence; Assess suitability, appropriateness, order-handling evidence, or best-execution evidence; Document audit, monitoring, or clock-synchronisation gaps for algorithmic-trading governance; Assess investment-service engineering evidence before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Implements financial records retention requirements across EU directives (5-7 years), SOX Section 802 (7 years), MiFID II (5-7 years), tax records, payment data, and AML obligations under AMLD. Maps financial data categories to statutory retention periods with cross-jurisdictional reconciliation. Activate for financial retention, SOX records, MiFID retention, AML retention, tax record keeping queries.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert in on-chain privacy technologies - ZK-SNARKs, ZK-STARKs, mixers, stealth addresses, ring signatures, and confidential transactions for building privacy-preserving blockchain applicationsUse when "privacy, zero knowledge, zk-snark, zk-stark, mixer, stealth address, ring signature, confidential transaction, tornado, private transaction, anonymous, unlinkability, privacy, zero-knowledge, zk-snarks, zk-starks, mixers, stealth-addresses, tornado-cash, zcash, confidential" mentioned.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Routes, triages, flags and rates a piece of text with a probability for every option: which department or queue a ticket goes to, which intent a message expresses, whether a yes/no condition holds (is this tool call grounded, should the agent ask first, is the customer angry), and how severe or urgent it is on a rubric, each with a calibrated confidence. Runs Claude Haiku in the request and response shapes of OpenAI's Decisions API, for when no purpose-built decision model is at hand. Use for "route this ticket", "triage these", "classify with a confidence", "give me a probability that", "rate the severity", "score against this rubric", guardrail checks before a tool call, or "a Decisions API without OpenAI".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Reads a model's own uncertainty from token log-probabilities: collecting and aggregating label logprobs, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration against human labels (ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams), downstream use, and reproducibility. Use for per-item classifier confidence or routing low-confidence cases to human review; codebook and validation design go to text-classification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
DiffDock and DiffDock-L diffusion-based molecular docking. Use for blind protein-small-molecule pose prediction from a PDB file or sequence plus SMILES/SDF/MOL2, batch docking over a CSV of complexes, virtual screening triage, sampling multiple poses per complex, and reading the confidence score correctly. Also trigger on DiffDock, DiffDock-L, inference.py, confidence_model, samples_per_complex, ESM embedding preparation for docking, or blind docking without a defined box. Not for binding affinity prediction — the confidence score ranks pose plausibility, not potency.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Identify insects using body plan analysis, dichotomous keys to order, wing venation, mouthpart type, antennae form, leg and tarsal structure, and confidence levels. Covers the fundamental hexapod body plan verification, a simplified dichotomous key to major orders, wing venation and type analysis, mouthpart classification, antennae morphology, leg specialization and tarsal formula, and a structured confidence assessment framework. Use when you need to identify an unknown insect beyond preliminary order placement, are working through a specimen for taxonomic study, want to distinguish between similar orders or families, or need to assign a confidence level to a field identification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Epistemic transparency — acknowledging uncertainty, flagging limitations, avoiding overconfidence, and communicating what is known, unknown, and uncertain with proportional confidence. Maps the HEXACO personality dimension to AI reasoning: truthful calibration of confidence, proactive disclosure of gaps, and resistance to the temptation to appear more certain than warranted. Use before presenting a conclusion, when answering questions where knowledge is partial or inferred, after noticing a temptation to state uncertain information as certain, or when a user is making decisions based on provided information.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Add an external probabilistic classifier to a decision path without letting it take the path over. Covers finding the externally-graded rows you are already logging, measuring the confidence separation between the overrides it got right and the ones it got wrong, choosing an operating point your data licenses, failing open at the call site, and proving the whole arrangement offline with no API key. Applies to any service returning a score you can order — TypeSafe AI's System One models (Jev) are the worked example. Most of the method transfers to a local model or a second heuristic, with the parts that do not called out where they arise. Use when a rule-based path is wrong often enough to hurt, when someone proposes replacing a heuristic with a model, when a confidence threshold needs a defensible value, or when an oracle already in production has never been graded.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Records atomic learned behaviors with confidence scores. Project-scoped instincts are isolated per project and auto-promote to global scope at confidence threshold 0.8. Stores instincts in .claude/context/memory/instincts.jsonl
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes malicious PDF files using PDFiD, pdf-parser, and peepdf to identify embedded JavaScript, shellcode, exploits, and suspicious objects without opening the document. Determines the attack vector and extracts embedded payloads for further analysis. Activates for requests involving PDF malware analysis, malicious document analysis, PDF exploit investigation, or suspicious attachment triage.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
[32] ANALYZE. Ensure every critical claim has verifiable evidence with confidence levels. Each fact must have source + confidence percentage. If confidence <85%, enter Loop150 to find more sources. Use for critical decisions, factual claims, legal/compliance work, or any situation where unverified claims are dangerous.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes malicious PDF files using PDFiD, pdf-parser, and peepdf to identify embedded JavaScript, shellcode, exploits, and suspicious objects without opening the document. Determines the attack vector and extracts embedded payloads for further analysis. Activates for requests involving PDF malware analysis, malicious document analysis, PDF exploit investigation, or suspicious attachment triage.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.