'formative' 검색 결과

The Jobs-to-be-Done framework as applied product methodology. Job statements, struggling moments, hire and fire criteria, the difference between feature-thinking and job-thinking. Honest about where JTBD adds clarity (discovery, prioritization, positioning) and where it becomes performative ritual (job-statement workshops that do not drive decisions, persona-theater disguised as JTBD). Triggers on jobs-to-be-done, JTBD, job statements, struggling moments, hire criteria, fire criteria, switch triggers, functional emotional social jobs, outcome-driven innovation. Also triggers when a team is over-relying on feature-request lists or persona archetypes that do not drive product decisions, when a positioning conversation needs the framing JTBD provides, or when discovery is producing outputs that do not connect to product strategy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) advisor covering CSF 2.0 and CSF 1.1. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST CSF, cybersecurity risk management, the six CSF functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), CSF profiles, implementation tiers, gap assessments, organizational profiles, community profiles, CSF core subcategories, informative references, or mapping to other frameworks (NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, COBIT). Also trigger for questions like "how do I implement NIST CSF?", "what does CSF 2.0 change?", "help me build a CSF profile", "how do I assess my cybersecurity posture?", or any request involving organizational cybersecurity risk strategy or framework alignment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design an error analysis protocol to diagnose the root cause of student mistakes and misconceptions. Use when error patterns appear in student work and targeted feedback is needed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design a diagnostic hinge question that reveals whether students understand enough to move on. Use when planning key checkpoints mid-lesson during explicit or direct instruction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Define the scope and purpose of a complex inquiry before mapping or futures work begins. Use when a class or group needs to agree what they are investigating, who it matters to, and at what scale.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyse existing written feedback for quality, specificity, actionability, and impact on student learning. Use when reviewing teacher or peer feedback to improve feedback practices.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a five-level rubric with coherent logic for a learning target within a developmental band. Use for Manning methodology programmes where Competent = success. For general curriculum rubrics, use criterion-referenced-rubric-generator instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit and redesign AI-generated feedback for pedagogical quality, timing, and learning impact. Use when building or reviewing automated feedback in digital learning tools.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate a criterion-referenced rubric with descriptive performance levels for a task or objective. Use for marking guides and general curriculum contexts. For Manning programmes where Competent = success, use coherent-rubric-logic-builder instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interpret learning analytics data and translate dashboard findings into actionable teaching decisions. Use when reviewing LMS data, quiz patterns, or engagement metrics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design a checking-for-understanding protocol with specific techniques for each lesson stage. Use when planning systematic comprehension checks during explicit or direct instruction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyse student work against criteria to identify specific gaps between current performance and learning objectives. Use when reviewing submissions, planning feedback, or diagnosing learning needs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) advisor covering CSF 2.0 and CSF 1.1. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST CSF, cybersecurity risk management, the six CSF functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), CSF profiles, implementation tiers, gap assessments, organizational profiles, community profiles, CSF core subcategories, informative references, or mapping to other frameworks (NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, COBIT). Also trigger for questions like "how do I implement NIST CSF?", "what does CSF 2.0 change?", "help me build a CSF profile", "how do I assess my cybersecurity posture?", or any request involving organizational cybersecurity risk strategy or framework alignment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

standR is an user-friendly R package providing functions to assist conducting good-practice analysis of Nanostring's GeoMX DSP data. All functions in the package are built based on the SpatialExperiment object, allowing integration into various spatial transcriptomics-related packages from Bioconductor. standR allows data inspection, quality control, normalization, batch correction and evaluation with informative visualizations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Receive and act on code review feedback with technical rigor, not performative agreement or blind implementation

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Filter degenerate, uninformative inputs before statistical tests: single-sequence alignments, empty files, constant features, zero-variance inputs, all-NaN columns. See nan-safe-correlation for NaN-aware correlation; statistical-analysis for test guidance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when receiving critical feedback on an analysis or manuscript, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or methodologically questionable - requires verification, not performative agreement or blind changes

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Compress-Cache-Retrieve for huge, repetitive array tool output (logs, scan results, time series, event streams) before it enters context. Keeps an informative sample — endpoints, anomalies/change-points, head/tail — drops the redundant rest to a local cache, and leaves a retrievable hash. Use when a tool returns a long uniform JSON array you must read but mostly skim, and the full set is one command away if needed. Lossy-but-recoverable.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Developmental Psychologist. Use when a task calls for Developmental Psychologist judgment. Reasons from developmental trajectories, measurement invariance, and familial-environmental context through age-normed instruments (Bayley, WPPSI/WISC, CBCL, MacArthur-Bates CDI), false-belief and violation-of-expectation paradigms, and lme4/lavaan growth models while treating verbal-demand confounding of theory of mind, informative attrition, adult-normed task misapplication, and parent-versus-direct-assessment divergence as first-class failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Selects informative features for biomarker discovery using Boruta all-relevant selection, mRMR minimum redundancy, and LASSO regularization. Use when identifying biomarkers from high-dimensional omics data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs Bayesian clinical trials including Phase I dose-finding (BOIN, CRM, EWOC, mTPI-2), meta-analytic-predictive (MAP) priors with robust mixtures for external data borrowing, EXNEX for basket trials, hierarchical models for safety AE (Berry-Berry), Bayesian platform trials (I-SPY 2, GBM AGILE, REMAP-CAP), and posterior probability stopping rules. Covers FDA Bayesian Devices Guidance (2010), FDA Bayesian Methodology in Drugs Draft (January 2026), BOIN Fit-for-Purpose qualification (December 2021), and Project Optimus dose-optimisation. Use when designing dose-finding studies, platform trials, or sensitivity analyses with informative priors.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert in live learning experiences - cohort-based courses, workshops, webinars, coaching sessions, and real-time facilitation. Covers designing for synchronous learning, building peer accountability, and creating transformative live experiences that self-paced courses can't match. Use when "cohort course, live course, workshop, webinar, group coaching, live session, cohort-based, " mentioned.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.