1.1천건 · 관련도순
Provides a consistent process for open-ended tasks involving files, shell commands, or the web. Clarifies the goal, outlines steps before execution, reports progress, and finishes with a summary of changes, verification, and unresolved work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review contracts, investment terms, and employment arrangements through six legal lenses. Identify key risks, organize negotiation priorities, and prepare specific questions for outside counsel before making commitments.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluate Google Cloud workloads against built-in best practices or custom organizational rules using Workload Manager. Use public client libraries or the REST API to run checks, review violations and scanned resources, and export results to BigQuery.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prepare and submit Superset bug reports, feature requests, or general feedback. It checks documentation first, organizes relevant details into a concise draft, and lets the user choose private submission or a public GitHub issue before sending.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Route requests to general assistance, medical source checks, educational answers, structured learning, or registration and subscriptions. It considers the intended use rather than isolated medical words, and refuses high-risk requests such as individual diagnosis or prescription dosing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create a structured Markdown report when multiple retrieval tools fail. Using available domain knowledge, the workflow separates verified facts from general guidance, marks missing data, and saves a document with limitations and practical next steps.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides authorized testing of injection flaws outside SQL, where crafted input changes how a system interprets a request. Helps agents define scope, choose alternative directions, document reproduction evidence, and decide when findings justify a report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Record a user's preferences, background, and goals in topic-specific Markdown files for personalized interactions. Keeps facts concise, updates corrected information, and distinguishes the user from the agent by writing in the third person.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and resources end to end. USE FOR: foundry, azd ai agent, azd provision/deploy, hosted agent scaffold/develop/run/deploy/troubleshoot, prompt agent create, managed harness agent create, GitHub Copilot harness agent, create agent, update agent, add tool to agent, invoke agent, agent insights, evaluate agent, batch eval, continuous eval, continuous monitoring, agent CI/CD, optimize prompt, improve prompt, optimize agent instructions, Agent Optimizer scaffold, dataset curation from traces, deploy model, model fine-tuning (SFT/DPO/RFT), Foundry project, RBAC, role assignment, permissions, quota, capacity, region, deployment failure, AI Services, create Foundry resource, knowledge index, customize deployment, onboard, availability, training-data, grader, distillation, large file upload. DO NOT USE FOR: Azure Functions, App Service, general Azure deploy (use azure-deploy), general Azure prep (use azure-prepare).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides general use of AWS messaging and streaming services. Covers Amazon SQS, Amazon SNS, Amazon EventBridge, Amazon MQ, Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, Amazon Data Firehose, Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink, and Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (MSK). Use when reasoning about messaging and streaming patterns. Also identifies which AWS service owns each customer communication channel: email (Amazon SES), and WhatsApp, SMS, MMS, RCS, voice and mobile push (the AWS End User Messaging family of services). Routes the request to the specialized skill for that channel. Defers to the channel's specialized skill when the user already named a specific channel. In general, use specific skills or documentation searches for detailed service-specific questions. Do NOT use for MSK or Managed Service for Apache Flink questions, prefer specific skills. Does not configure customer communication channels; defers to specific skills.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply general knowledge reasoning across diverse domains — trivia, commonsense inference, analogy, and factual question answering.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and resources end to end. USE FOR: foundry, azd ai agent, azd provision/deploy, hosted agent scaffold/develop/run/deploy/troubleshoot, prompt agent create, managed harness agent create, GitHub Copilot harness agent, create agent, update agent, add tool to agent, invoke agent, agent insights, evaluate agent, batch eval, continuous eval, continuous monitoring, agent CI/CD, optimize prompt, improve prompt, optimize agent instructions, Agent Optimizer scaffold, dataset curation from traces, deploy model, model fine-tuning (SFT/DPO/RFT), Foundry project, RBAC, role assignment, permissions, quota, capacity, region, deployment failure, AI Services, create Foundry resource, knowledge index, customize deployment, onboard, availability, training-data, grader, distillation, large file upload. DO NOT USE FOR: Azure Functions, App Service, general Azure deploy (use azure-deploy), general Azure prep (use azure-prepare).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Answer a question from a second-brain vault by reading its own pages, citing the pages used, and saying plainly when the vault does not contain the answer. Use this skill whenever the user asks what they know about a topic, what they have read on something, what connects two ideas, what they have changed their mind about, or asks any question that should be answered from their own notes rather than general knowledge. Do NOT use for ingesting new material, for general questions the vault has nothing to do with, or when the user explicitly wants an answer from the open web.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert SOX IT General Controls (ITGC) advisor for finance, internal audit and IT compliance teams. Covers the four ITGC domains external auditors test for SOX 404 — access to programs and data, program changes, computer operations, and program development — plus scoping in-scope systems from the financial statements, designing risk-and-control matrices (RCMs), writing control narratives and test scripts, evaluating deficiencies (control deficiency vs significant deficiency vs material weakness under AS 2201 and Reg S-X), drafting remediation plans, SOX 404(a)/404(b) applicability and filer status, IPO readiness timelines, and COSO 2013 alignment. Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOX, ITGC, IT general controls, 404(a)/404(b), ICFR, material weakness, user access reviews, segregation of duties in IT, change management controls for financial systems, SOX testing or walkthroughs, PCAOB audits, or quarterly compliance for financial reporting systems.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
DL cell/nucleus segmentation for fluorescence and brightfield microscopy. Pre-trained models (cyto3, nuclei, tissuenet) and a generalist flow-based algorithm segment cells without retraining. Outputs label masks for morphology and tracking. Use scikit-image watershed for rule-based; Cellpose when DL generalization across staining is needed.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when the user wants to record bookkeeping entries (仕訳), import transaction data from CSV files, receipts, or invoices, or manage their general ledger. Trigger phrases include: "仕訳を入力", "仕訳登録", "CSVを取り込む", "レシートを読み込む", "請求書を取り込む", "帳簿を付ける", "経費を記録", "売上を記録", "仕訳を修正", "仕訳を検索", "仕訳を削除", "取引を登録", "帳簿の初期化".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Implements HIPAA breach notification requirements under 45 CFR §164.400-414. Covers individual notification within 60 days, HHS reporting thresholds (500+ immediate, under 500 annual), state attorney general notification, media notification for 500+ in a state, and breach risk assessment. Keywords: HIPAA breach notification, HHS reporting, OCR breach portal, individual notice, state attorney general.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Executes breach notification under California Civil Code Section 1798.82 (California data breach notification law). Covers data elements triggering notification, timing requirements (most expedient time possible), AG notification for 500+ California residents, specific content and format requirements, and substitute notice provisions. Keywords: California, breach notification, Cal. Civ. Code 1798.82, attorney general, CCPA, data elements.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Test payment and checkout flows end to end against PSP sandboxes — Stripe first, with the general pattern for Adyen/Braintree/PayPal. Covers Stripe test-mode card numbers and their decline codes, the 3DS/SCA challenge flow and its nested-iframe handling in Playwright, test clocks for subscription/billing-cycle simulation, webhook testing (stripe listen/trigger, signature verification, idempotency), failed/retried payments and refunds, and never using real cards. Use when: "test Stripe checkout," "payment test," "3DS test," "test webhook signature," "test subscription renewal," "test clock," "refund test," "decline card test," "checkout E2E." Not for: General API contract testing of non-payment endpoints — api-testing. PCI-DSS/regulatory compliance audit — compliance-testing. Related: api-testing, playwright-automation, compliance-testing, test-data-management, qa-project-context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Valuation criteria for developed market value general insurance stocks. P/B 0.7-1.5x, Combined Ratio <100%, investment yield benchmarks, and dividend sustainability assessment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Valuation criteria for developed market growth general insurance stocks. Combined Ratio improvement trajectory, premium growth 7-10% YoY, expense ratio decline, and retention rate targets.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generalization and composition of constraints across navigators
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.