'general mode' 검색 결과

Build, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and resources end to end. USE FOR: foundry, azd ai agent, azd provision/deploy, hosted agent scaffold/develop/run/deploy/troubleshoot, prompt agent create, managed harness agent create, GitHub Copilot harness agent, create agent, update agent, add tool to agent, invoke agent, agent insights, evaluate agent, batch eval, continuous eval, continuous monitoring, agent CI/CD, optimize prompt, improve prompt, optimize agent instructions, Agent Optimizer scaffold, dataset curation from traces, deploy model, model fine-tuning (SFT/DPO/RFT), Foundry project, RBAC, role assignment, permissions, quota, capacity, region, deployment failure, AI Services, create Foundry resource, knowledge index, customize deployment, onboard, availability, training-data, grader, distillation, large file upload. DO NOT USE FOR: Azure Functions, App Service, general Azure deploy (use azure-deploy), general Azure prep (use azure-prepare).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds and deploys containerized workloads on Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS), Elastic Container Service (ECS), Fargate, and ECR (Elastic Container Registry). Covers general EKS knowledge, Karpenter, AWS Load Balancer Controller and leveraging various open source Kubernetes projects with EKS. Covers general ECS knowledge, task definitions, Fargate services, ECS Exec, ECS Express Mode and ECS Managed Instances. Covers general Elastic Beanstalk knowledge, Elastic Beanstalk configuration and platforms supported by Elastic Beanstalk. Covers general ECR knowledge, ECR repository setup and lifecycle policies. Includes recommending, enabling, and reading Amazon ECS Action Logs to troubleshoot control-plane failures (deployment rollback/circuit-breaker, task placement, scaling, task replacement). Applies when deploying, debugging, or optimizing containers on AWS. Should be used instead of relying on internal knowledge for these services.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and resources end to end. USE FOR: foundry, azd ai agent, azd provision/deploy, hosted agent scaffold/develop/run/deploy/troubleshoot, prompt agent create, managed harness agent create, GitHub Copilot harness agent, create agent, update agent, add tool to agent, invoke agent, agent insights, evaluate agent, batch eval, continuous eval, continuous monitoring, agent CI/CD, optimize prompt, improve prompt, optimize agent instructions, Agent Optimizer scaffold, dataset curation from traces, deploy model, model fine-tuning (SFT/DPO/RFT), Foundry project, RBAC, role assignment, permissions, quota, capacity, region, deployment failure, AI Services, create Foundry resource, knowledge index, customize deployment, onboard, availability, training-data, grader, distillation, large file upload. DO NOT USE FOR: Azure Functions, App Service, general Azure deploy (use azure-deploy), general Azure prep (use azure-prepare).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Delegate code review to a subagent running a specific model. Use ONLY when user explicitly names a model to review changes ("review with opus", "use sonnet to review", "review with gemini"). The root agent reconstructs changes from conversation history and spawns a subagent with the code-review skill using the specified model. Do NOT use for general code review (use code-review skill instead), for reviewing PRs from git history, or when no model is specified by the user.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when refining a draft user prompt before sending it to a coding agent. Decomposes goal/context/constraints/acceptance/output-format, detects ambiguity and model-coupled framing, then emits a model-agnostic rewrite. Supports --analyze, --score, and --deep. NOT for prompts from scratch (mk:brainstorming), plans/reviews (mk:elicit), implementation plans (mk:plan-creator), or general codebase scouting (mk:scout).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn audio and video into text with Whisper, including Japanese and other supported languages. This skill covers transcription, English translation, timestamped subtitles, model selection, and batch processing, with guidance on hardware needs and recognition limitations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Transcribing recorded meetings
• Creating subtitles for videos
• Translating multilingual recordings into English text

Design a RAG pipeline that retrieves documents to support AI answers. Analyze document splitting, select embedding models and vector databases, and evaluate retrieval quality using test queries and known relevant documents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Designing a RAG system for internal documents
• Choosing how to split documents for search
• Comparing embedding models and vector databases

Evaluate AI models and agents on Google Cloud using test datasets and scoring criteria. Generate simulated user scenarios, analyze failures, and compare results across changes to guide improvements to prompts and code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Build evaluation datasets from conversation logs
• Generate simulated user scenarios
• Choose scoring criteria for responses and tool use

Guides image classification and search with OpenAI's CLIP by comparing images with text descriptions, without additional training. Includes batch processing, image-text matching, and category-based checks for potentially inappropriate images.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Classify images using text labels without additional training
• Search an image collection with natural-language descriptions
• Compare how closely images match text descriptions

Turn recorded audio and video into text or timestamped subtitles with Whisper. This skill covers transcription across 99 languages, language detection, translation into English, batch processing, and model selection for available computing resources.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Transcribe recorded meetings
• Turn podcasts into text
• Generate SRT or VTT subtitles for videos

Choose and implement machine learning methods for estimating causal effects with many control variables or effects that differ across groups. Guidance covers DML, causal forests, and related methods, including diagnostics and limits on interpretation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Estimating average effects with many control variables
• Studying how treatment effects differ across groups
• Implementing cross-fitting for causal estimation

Explain trained machine learning models through feature attribution, local explanations, and behavior summaries. Use as an explicit/manual helper once a model already exists, not for training ownership, leakage auditing, or general ML strategy selection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the model setup, equilibrium concept, or proof architecture is the bottleneck for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — the central skill for a theory-first paper. Builds the model to the AEJ: Micro bar (clean, general, well-motivated result); it does not check whether your theorem is correct.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Via modeling: pads, antipads, ground return vias, GRV placement, and signal integrity for high-speed layer transitions. TRIGGER: user asks to model a via, design a via transition, place ground return vias, analyze via performance, or check signal integrity through layer transitions. Invoke BEFORE writing code — only viaSingleEnded exists (no viaDifferential), and the location format is non-obvious. SKIP: general signal integrity without vias (use matlab-analyze-em), transmission line design (use matlab-design-pcb-transmission-line), PDN analysis (use matlab-analyze-pcb-pdn), material/stackup setup only (use matlab-manage-pcb-material).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants to compare or benchmark multiple LLMs/agents arena-style but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — a general-purpose win-rate comparison on a custom task, or a benchmark specifically about reference/citation hallucination rate. Also use when the user mentions model arena, agent arena, pairwise model comparison, win-rate ranking, or comparing models on a task and hasn't specified whether that task is generic or about citation accuracy. This skill is the entry router for the arena-eval suite: it asks one diagnostic question when needed, then recommends the workflow or workflows needed to cover the request.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Microbiome time series simulation with generalized Lotka-Volterra model, Self-Organized Instability (SOI), and other models. Hubbell's Neutral model is used to determine the abundance matrix. The resulting abundance matrix is applied to (Tree)SummarizedExperiment objects.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create a repository-grounded AppSec threat model covering assets, trust boundaries, attackers, abuse paths, and mitigations. Use only for explicit threat-modeling requests, not general architecture or code review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Answer a hard question by fanning it out to a PANEL of models running in parallel — each answering independently with web search and bash, none seeing the others' work — then having Opus 4.8 judge every response into a structured analysis (consensus, contradictions, partial coverage, unique insights, blind spots) and write a final answer grounded in it. The panel is two independent Opus 4.8 runs (slug opus4.8-4.8), Opus 4.8 + GPT-5.5 via codex (opus4.8-gpt5.5), Opus 4.8 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via agy (opus4.8-gemini3.1pro), or all three (opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro). Opus always judges and writes the final answer — the pipeline can't be reversed. Runs on local CLI subscriptions (no metered API), and saves a timestamped provenance .md per run. Use this whenever the user asks to "run it through Fusion", says /fusion, wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer, wants a question cross-checked across models, or wants a higher-confidence answer with consensus and blind spots surfaced — even if they don't say "fusion". General-purpose: any topic (research, law, strategy, technical, personal). Best for high-stakes research, design calls, and debugging where being confidently wrong is expensive.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produce short-form video with Pika (pika.art) — its effect-driven tools (Pikaffects, Pikadditions, Pikaswaps, Pikaframes, Pikascenes, Pikatwists) and audio-driven lip sync (Pikaformance), plus text-to-video and image-to-video. Use when a task calls for playful, stylized, meme-able social clips, or for applying generative effects and object swaps to real uploaded footage, and when deciding whether Pika is the right engine versus a higher-fidelity model. Covers model versions, credit/plan economics, the fal.ai API route, prompt construction, iteration/repair, capability limits, and consent/rights rules for uploaded real-person media. Not a general "best video model" chooser.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Select, integrate, and operate multi-model image-generation gateways with model-specific schema discovery, version policy, asynchronous jobs, webhooks, spend approval, safe inputs and artifacts, data-governance review, and billing observability. Use for comparing or building against fal.ai, Replicate, or Together AI image APIs, including controlled failover; do not use for direct model-provider APIs, local inference, training, dedicated endpoint provisioning, video generation, or general image editing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

口腔种植 (含 单牙/多牙缺失种植 / 全口 All-on-X / 即刻种植 即刻负重 / 上颌窦提升 / 牙槽嵴骨增量 GBR / 软组织移植 / 数字化种植 (CBCT 设计 + 口扫 + 导板 + CAD-CAM 上部) / 种植体周炎防治 / 种植修复 (基台 + 冠 + 杆卡 + 覆盖义齿) — 不含 普通牙体牙髓 / 正畸 / 儿牙 / 口腔颌面外科肿瘤 / 隐形矫治商业) (implant dentistry — surgical placement and prosthetic restoration of osseointegrated dental implants; covers diagnosis & treatment planning, site preparation (bone augmentation, sinus elevation, soft-tissue grafting), implant placement (delayed / immediate / immediate-loading), provisionalization and final restoration (cement / screw retained, custom abutments, full-arch), digital workflow (CBCT planning, intra-oral scanning, guided surgery, CAD-CAM milled prosthetics), and long-term maintenance including peri-implantitis prevention and treatment; NOT general restorative dentistry, NOT orthodontics, NOT pediatric dentistry, NOT maxillofacial oncology / trauma reconstruction, NOT clear-aligner business.) Master OS — automated mastery of implant dentistry — surgical placement and prosthetic restoration of osseointegrated dental implants; covers diagnosis & treatment planning, site preparation (bone augmentation, sinus elevation, soft-tissue grafting), implant placement (delayed / immediate / immediate-loading), provisionalization and final restoration (cement / screw retained, custom abutments, full-arch), digital workflow (CBCT planning, intra-oral scanning, guided surgery, CAD-CAM milled prosthetics), and long-term maintenance including peri-implantitis prevention and treatment; NOT general restorative dentistry, NOT orthodontics, NOT pediatric dentistry, NOT maxillofacial oncology / trauma reconstruction, NOT clear-aligner business.: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on implant dentistry — surgical placement and prosthetic restoration of osseointegrated dental implants; covers diagnosis & treatment planning, site preparation (bone augmentation, sinus elevation, soft-tissue grafting), implant placement (delayed / immediate / immediate-loading), provisionalization and final restoration (cement / screw retained, custom abutments, full-arch), digital workflow (CBCT planning, intra-oral scanning, guided surgery, CAD-CAM milled prosthetics), and long-term maintenance including peri-implantitis prevention and treatment; NOT general restorative dentistry, NOT orthodontics, NOT pediatric dentistry, NOT maxillofacial oncology / trauma reconstruction, NOT clear-aligner business. problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「种植牙」「种植」「口腔种植」「牙种植」「implant」

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Vue 3 form patterns: native v-model, vee-validate + zod (most common), VueUse helpers, defineModel for custom inputs, controlled vs uncontrolled, field arrays, multi-step wizards. Use this skill to: - Wire vee-validate with a validation schema (zod / yup). - Build custom form components with defineModel (Vue 3.4+). - Implement multi-step forms. - Handle async validation. - Integrate forms with TanStack Query mutations or Pinia actions. Do NOT use this skill for: - General SFC conventions (see vue-conventions). - State management (see vue-state-management). - Routing (see vue-routing). - Testing forms (see vue-testing).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.